IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4462-d1401209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Public’s Intention to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: Based on Social Media Data Mining and Questionnaire Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Liao

    (Department of Automobile and Transportation, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Hanying Guo

    (Department of Automobile and Transportation, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Hongguo Shi

    (Department of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

Abstract

While the emergence of shared autonomous vehicles can be an effective solution to improve transport issues and achieve sustainable development, the benefits associated with shared autonomous vehicles can only be realized when the public intends to use them. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct an in-depth study on the public’s intention to use shared autonomous vehicles and identify the key influencing factors. This study mined social media data to obtain real public perceptions. A qualitative exploratory analysis was used to identify thematic variables regarding social media data on shared autonomous vehicles, from which a research model of the public’s intention to use SAVs was proposed. Then, a questionnaire survey was conducted, and the structural equation model and Bayesian network were used to analyze the questionnaire data quantitatively. The findings reveal how perceived risk, social information, trust, perceived usefulness, and personality traits affect the public’s intention to use shared autonomous vehicles, and how to enhance the public’s intention to use them. This study will enrich the research on traveler psychology in the context of intelligent travel and provide theoretical basis and decision support for future policies to promote shared autonomous vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Liao & Hanying Guo & Hongguo Shi, 2024. "Research on the Public’s Intention to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: Based on Social Media Data Mining and Questionnaire Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4462-:d:1401209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarv Devaraj & Robert F. Easley & J. Michael Crant, 2008. "Research Note ---How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 93-105, March.
    2. Woldeamanuel, Mintesnot & Nguyen, Dang, 2018. "Perceived benefits and concerns of autonomous vehicles: An exploratory study of millennials’ sentiments of an emerging market," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 44-53.
    3. Petrović, Đorđe & Mijailović, Radomir M. & Pešić, Dalibor, 2022. "Persons with physical disabilities and autonomous vehicles: The perspective of the driving status," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 98-110.
    4. Gunnvald Svendsen & Jan-Are Johnsen & Live Almås-Sørensen & Joar Vittersø, 2013. "Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 323-334.
    5. Kum Fai Yuen & Do Thi Khanh Huyen & Xueqin Wang & Guanqiu Qi, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Shared Autonomous Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Kenesei, Zsófia & Ásványi, Katalin & Kökény, László & Jászberényi, Melinda & Miskolczi, Márk & Gyulavári, Tamás & Syahrivar, Jhanghiz, 2022. "Trust and perceived risk: How different manifestations affect the adoption of autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 379-393.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Liao & Hanying Guo & Xinju Liu, 2023. "A Study of Young People’s Intention to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Quantitative Analysis Model Based on the Extended TPB-TAM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Koh, Le Yi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: Examining the joint influence of perceived vehicle performance and intelligent in-vehicle interaction quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Bangwool Han & Minho Kim, 2019. "Hofstede’s Collectivistic Values and Sustainable Growth of Online Group Buying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Constant Berkhout & Abhi Bhattacharya & Carlos Bauer & Ross W. Johnson, 2024. "Revisiting the construct of data-driven decision making: antecedents, scope, and boundaries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(10), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Arghya Ray & Muskan Jain & Lan Ma & Khalid Hussain Alhamzi & Ananya Ray & Long She, 2024. "The impact of personality traits, barriers and gamification on Gen X continuance intention for mobile credit bill payment apps," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1154-1174, September.
    6. Mumtaz Reina Mendonca, 2016. "Relating Big Five Factor Model to the Acceptance and Use of On-line Shopping," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 89-98, June.
    7. Weina Qu & Hongli Sun & Yan Ge, 2021. "The effects of trait anxiety and the big five personality traits on self-driving car acceptance," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2663-2679, October.
    8. Li, Dun & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2022. "Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 120-135.
    9. Panagiotis Adamopoulos & Anindya Ghose & Vilma Todri, 2018. "The Impact of User Personality Traits on Word of Mouth: Text-Mining Social Media Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 612-640, September.
    10. He, Pan & Veronesi, Marcella, 2017. "Personality traits and renewable energy technology adoption: A policy case study from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 472-479.
    11. Meng, Keira Shuyang & Leung, Louis, 2021. "Factors influencing TikTok engagement behaviors in China: An examination of gratifications sought, narcissism, and the Big Five personality traits," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7).
    12. Lin Tu & Min Xu, 2024. "An Analysis of the Use of Autonomous Vehicles in the Shared Mobility Market: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Jack Adams & Ozgur Dedehayir & Peter O’Connor & Tomi Nokelainen, 2019. "Who Are The Adopters Of Retro-Technology?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Wei Luo & Silong Wei & Yi Wang & Pengpeng Jiao, 2023. "People’s Intentions to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Wilburn Lane, 2012. "The Influence of Personality Traits on Mobile Phone Application Preferences," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(5), pages 252-260.
    16. Lu Kong & Hessam Sadatsafavi & Rohit Verma, 2019. "Usage and Impact of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare Delivery," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 172-188, October.
    17. Ricardo Buettner, 2017. "Predicting user behavior in electronic markets based on personality-mining in large online social networks," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(3), pages 247-265, August.
    18. Wu, Min & Wang, Nanxi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Can autonomy level and anthropomorphic characteristics affect public acceptance and trust towards shared autonomous vehicles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Sabina Lissitsa & Ofrit Kol, 2021. "Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 545-570, June.
    20. Stefan Stieglitz & Milad Mirbabaie & Nicholas R. J. Möllmann & Jannik Rzyski, 2022. "Collaborating with Virtual Assistants in Organizations: Analyzing Social Loafing Tendencies and Responsibility Attribution," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 745-770, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4462-:d:1401209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.