IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v11y2019i3p172-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usage and Impact of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Kong

    (SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850;)

  • Hessam Sadatsafavi

    (Emergency Medicine Research Office, University of Virginia School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908;)

  • Rohit Verma

    (SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850; VinUniversity, VinUni Project, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

Abstract

This paper discusses two aspects of the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in healthcare: first, the prevalence of using tables and laptop computers by physicians during clinical visits and, second, the growing trend of using such technologies for delivering healthcare remotely. Phone interview data from a random sample of 1,600 individuals with diverse sociodemographic characteristics were collected. Open-ended and structured questionnaires were used to elicit relevant information, which was analyzed using qualitative content analysis and logistic regression models. Results suggest that, as computer literacy is increasing within the general population and caregivers’ skills in using the computer technology is improving, patients are welcoming the use of ICTs in healthcare. The analysis also showed that age together with enabling factors, such as income and education, are substantial barriers to the use of remote care services, even more important than gender, place of residence, race or ethnicity, and care need. Income and education do not influence the acceptance of ICT use by doctors during visits. Females, older participants, and those with more children in the household showed more resistance to the use of ICT in healthcare. At the same time, the depersonalization of interactions with caregivers was a critical concern identified related to the use of ICT in healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Kong & Hessam Sadatsafavi & Rohit Verma, 2019. "Usage and Impact of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare Delivery," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 172-188, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:172-188
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2019.0244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2019.0244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2019.0244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarv Devaraj & Robert F. Easley & J. Michael Crant, 2008. "Research Note ---How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 93-105, March.
    2. Prieger, James E., 2013. "The broadband digital divide and the economic benefits of mobile broadband for rural areas," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 483-502.
    3. Kentaro Watanabe & Masaaki Mochimaru, 2017. "Expanding Impacts of Technology-Assisted Service Systems Through Generalization: Case Study of the Japanese Service Engineering Research Project," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 250-262, September.
    4. Vijay Viswanathan & Linda D. Hollebeek & Edward C. Malthouse & Ewa Maslowska & Su Jung Kim & Wei Xie, 2017. "The Dynamics of Consumer Engagement with Mobile Technologies," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 36-49, March.
    5. Craig Standing & Helen Cripps, 2015. "Critical Success Factors in the Implementation of Electronic Health Records: A Two-Case Comparison," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 75-85, January.
    6. Saver, B.G. & Peterfreund, N., 1993. "Insurance, income, and access to ambulatory care in King County, Washington," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(11), pages 1583-1588.
    7. Goldfarb, Avi & Prince, Jeff, 2008. "Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 2-15, March.
    8. Johnson, R.L. & Roter, D. & Powe, N.R. & Cooper, L.A., 2004. "Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(12), pages 2084-2090.
    9. Urvashi Tandon & Ravi Kiran & Ash N. Sah, 2017. "Customer Satisfaction as Mediator Between Website Service Quality and Repurchase Intention: An Emerging Economy Case," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 106-120, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Granguillhome Ochoa, Rogelio & Lach, Samantha & Masaki, Takaaki & Rodríguez-Castelán, Carlos, 2022. "Mobile internet adoption in West Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Quaglione, Davide & Matteucci, Nicola & Furia, Donatella & Marra, Alessandro & Pozzi, Cesare, 2020. "Are mobile and fixed broadband substitutes or complements? New empirical evidence from Italy and implications for the digital divide policies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Kongaut, Chatchai & Bohlin, Erik, 2014. "Investigating mobile broadband adoption and usage: S case of smartphone in Sweden," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106848, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Conrad, Alexander & Hoffmann, Alexander & Neuberger, Doris, 2017. "Physische und digitale Erreichbarkeit von Finanzdienstleistungen der Sparkassen," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 149, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    5. Alexander Conrad & Alexander Hoffmann & Doris Neuberger, 2018. "Physische und digitale Erreichbarkeit von Finanzdienstleistungen der Sparkassen und Genossenschaftsbanken [Physical and digital accessibility of financial services at savings and cooperative banks]," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 38(2), pages 255-284, October.
    6. Chyke A Doubeni & Guruprasad D Jambaulikar & Hassan Fouayzi & Scott B Robinson & Margaret J Gunter & Terry S Field & Douglas W Roblin & Robert H Fletcher, 2012. "Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Use of Colonoscopy in an Insured Population – A Retrospective Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.
    7. Ewa Lechman, 2012. "Technology convergence and digital divides. A country-level evidence for the period 2000–2010," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 31.
    8. Robiady, Nurlita Devian & Windasari, Nila Armelia & Nita, Arfenia, 2021. "Customer engagement in online social crowdfunding: The influence of storytelling technique on donation performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 492-500.
    9. Daniel O. Beltran & Kuntal K. Das & Robert W. Fairlie, 2008. "Are Computers Good for Children? The Effects of Home Computers on Educational Outcomes," CEPR Discussion Papers 576, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    10. Bangwool Han & Minho Kim, 2019. "Hofstede’s Collectivistic Values and Sustainable Growth of Online Group Buying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Dogra, Nikhil & Adil, Mohd & Sadiq, Mohd & Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Unraveling customer repurchase intention in OFDL context: An investigation using a hybrid technique of SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Norman, Neville R., 2015. "The dynamics of information and communications technologies infrastructure, economic growth, and financial development: Evidence from Asian countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 135-149.
    13. Bulman, George & Fairlie, Robert W, 2015. "Technology and Education: Computers, Software, and the Internet," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5265z87t, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    14. Fairlie, Robert W. & Kalil, Ariel, 2017. "The effects of computers on children's social development and school participation: Evidence from a randomized control experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 10-19.
    15. Margarita Billon & Rocio Marco & Fernando Lera-Lopez, 2017. "Innovation and ICT use in the EU: an analysis of regional drivers," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1083-1108, November.
    16. Lili Li & Yiwu Zeng & Zi Ye & Hongdong Guo, 2021. "E‐commerce development and urban‐rural income gap: Evidence from Zhejiang Province, China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(2), pages 475-494, April.
    17. Constant Berkhout & Abhi Bhattacharya & Carlos Bauer & Ross W. Johnson, 2024. "Revisiting the construct of data-driven decision making: antecedents, scope, and boundaries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(10), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Brian E. Whitacre & David Shideler & Randi Williams, 2016. "Do Incentive Programs Cause Growth? The Case of the Oklahoma Quality Jobs Program and Community-Level Economic Growth," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(1), pages 62-74, February.
    19. Arghya Ray & Muskan Jain & Lan Ma & Khalid Hussain Alhamzi & Ananya Ray & Long She, 2024. "The impact of personality traits, barriers and gamification on Gen X continuance intention for mobile credit bill payment apps," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1154-1174, September.
    20. Sadaf Bashir & Bert Sadowski, 2014. "General Purpose Technologies: A Survey, a Critique and Future Research Directions," Working Papers 14-02, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2014.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:172-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.