IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6795-d1452338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Use of Autonomous Vehicles in the Shared Mobility Market: Opportunities and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Tu

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong)

  • Min Xu

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong)

Abstract

The rapid growth of the sharing economy has propelled shared mobility to the forefront of the public’s attention. Continuous advancements in autonomous driving technology also bring new opportunities and challenges to the shared mobility industry. This study comprehensively analyzes the impact of using land-based autonomous vehicles (AVs) to provide shared mobility services, utilizing SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats), PESTLE analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental), and Porter’s Five Forces (the bargaining power of suppliers, the bargaining power of buyers, threats of new entrants, substitutes, and rivalry). The findings reveal that AVs can provide improved shared mobility services by increasing transportation safety, reducing emissions, reducing costs, enhancing traffic efficiency, and increasing customer satisfaction as well as the profitability of shared mobility services. However, challenges such as technological and policy uncertainties, safety concerns, high initial costs, inadequate public communication infrastructure, and the absence of standardized regulations can hinder the widespread adoption of AVs. The benefits are also restricted by the low market penetration rate of AVs. To promote AVs in the shared mobility market, this study also provides implications for AV stakeholders tailored to the evolving shared mobility market dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Tu & Min Xu, 2024. "An Analysis of the Use of Autonomous Vehicles in the Shared Mobility Market: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6795-:d:1452338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Zhiyong & Li, Ruimin & Dai, Jingchen, 2022. "Effects and feasibility of shared mobility with shared autonomous vehicles: An investigation based on data-driven modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 206-226.
    2. Richard A. Epstein, 2021. "Liability rules for autonomous vehicles," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 218-234, March.
    3. Kum Fai Yuen & Do Thi Khanh Huyen & Xueqin Wang & Guanqiu Qi, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Shared Autonomous Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tymoteusz Miller & Irmina Durlik & Ewelina Kostecka & Adrianna Łobodzińska & Marcin Matuszak, 2024. "The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Energy Efficiency and Reducing GHG Emissions in Transport Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Yuansheng Cao & Yonggang Liao & Jiancong Lai & Tianjie Shen & Xiaofei Wang, 2024. "Study on the Deviation Characteristics of Driving Trajectories for Autonomous Vehicles and the Design of Dedicated Lane Widths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Liao & Hanying Guo & Hongguo Shi, 2024. "Research on the Public’s Intention to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: Based on Social Media Data Mining and Questionnaire Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Wei Luo & Silong Wei & Yi Wang & Pengpeng Jiao, 2023. "People’s Intentions to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Wu, Min & Wang, Nanxi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Can autonomy level and anthropomorphic characteristics affect public acceptance and trust towards shared autonomous vehicles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Suk Min Pang & Jen Sim Ho & Booi Chen Tan & Teck Chai Lau & Nasreen Khan, 2024. "Navigating the Road to Acceptance: Unveiling Psychological and Socio-Demographic Influences on Autonomous Vehicle Adoption in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Mohammadhossein Abbasi & Amir Reza Mamdoohi & Grzegorz Sierpiński & Francesco Ciari, 2023. "Usage Intention of Shared Autonomous Vehicles with Dynamic Ride Sharing on Long-Distance Trips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Giovanni Baldi & Antonietta Megaro & Luca Carrubbo, 2022. "Small-Town Citizens’ Technology Acceptance of Smart and Sustainable City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Wiedemann, Nina & Xin, Yanan & Medici, Vasco & Nespoli, Lorenzo & Suel, Esra & Raubal, Martin, 2024. "Vehicle-to-grid for car sharing - A simulation study for 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    8. Yavuz, Yigit Can, 2024. "Exploring university students’ acceptability of autonomous vehicles and urban air mobility," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Meng Liu & Ze Shi & Zaisheng Zhang, 2024. "How Environmental Policy Perception and Social Media Use Impact Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Initial trust formation on shared autonomous vehicles: Exploring the effects of personality-, transfer- and performance-based stimuli," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Singha Chaveesuk & Wornchanok Chaiyasoonthorn & Nayika Kamales & Zdzislawa Dacko-Pikiewicz & Wiesław Liszewski & Bilal Khalid, 2023. "Evaluating the Determinants of Consumer Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles in Thailand—An Extended UTAUT Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Fatemeh Nazari & Yellitza Soto & Mohamadhossein Noruzoliaee, 2023. "Privately-Owned versus Shared Automated Vehicle: The Roles of Utilitarian and Hedonic Beliefs," Papers 2309.03283, arXiv.org.
    13. Charli Sitinjak & Zurinah Tahir & Mohd Ekhwan Toriman & Novel Lyndon & Vladimir Simic & Charles Musselwhite & Wiyanti Fransisca Simanullang & Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah, 2023. "Assessing Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles for Smart and Sustainable Public Transportation in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Jakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Zaisheng Zhang & Meng Liu & Qing Yang, 2021. "Examining the External Antecedents of Innovative Work Behavior: The Role of Government Support for Talent Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Yang Liao & Hanying Guo & Xinju Liu, 2023. "A Study of Young People’s Intention to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Quantitative Analysis Model Based on the Extended TPB-TAM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Wei Wei & Jie Sun & Wei Miao & Tong Chen & Hanchu Sun & Shuyuan Lin & Chao Gu, 2024. "Using the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to explore how to increase users’ intention to take a robotaxi," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Faisal, Asif & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Paz, Alexander, 2023. "Understanding driverless car adoption: Random parameters ordered probit model for Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6795-:d:1452338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.