IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p628-d1019729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Well-Being for a Sustainable Future: The Influence of Trust in Big Business and Banks on Perceptions of Technological Development from a Life Satisfaction Perspective in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Arelys López-Concepción

    (Department of Business Management and Organisation, School of Engineering and Architecture, Faculty of Economics and Business, Rio Ebro Campus, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Ana Gil-Lacruz

    (Department of Business Management and Organisation, School of Engineering and Architecture, Faculty of Economics and Business, Rio Ebro Campus, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Isabel Saz-Gil

    (Department of Business Management and Organisation, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Universidad de Zaragoza, 44003 Teruel, Spain)

  • Víctor Bazán-Monasterio

    (University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

Sustainable development is becoming increasingly important because it improves the quality of our lives. Businesses must focus beyond maximizing corporate economic profits, which are very important. They must internalize the fact that planning and governance-oriented strategies focused on promoting human health and well-being ensure a sustainable future. This study explores the influence exerted by trust in large companies and banks on the perception that technological development has on people’s life satisfaction. The research uses data from the World Value Survey (WVS) and the World Bank, contemplating six Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru, in the period between 2012 and 2018. Our main results show that the lower the trust in institutions, the stronger the negative association with perceiving science and technology as making life easier, healthier and more comfortable in the near future. We also confirm that people who have very high levels of national pride tend to trust institutions. We also confirm that people who have very high levels of national pride tend to trust institutions. Finally, with this work, we contribute new empirical evidence to the current field of research on the influence of technological development on issues related to human beings, specifically in Latin America.

Suggested Citation

  • Arelys López-Concepción & Ana Gil-Lacruz & Isabel Saz-Gil & Víctor Bazán-Monasterio, 2022. "Social Well-Being for a Sustainable Future: The Influence of Trust in Big Business and Banks on Perceptions of Technological Development from a Life Satisfaction Perspective in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:628-:d:1019729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Daskalopoulou, 2019. "Individual-Level Evidence on the Causal Relationship Between Social Trust and Institutional Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 275-298, July.
    2. Mohamed Sameer Hoosain & Babu Sena Paul & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2020. "The Impact of 4IR Digital Technologies and Circular Thinking on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Marco Ciziceno & Giovanni A. Travaglino, 2019. "Perceived Corruption and Individuals’ Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 685-701, January.
    4. Jiang, Hong & Zhao, Shukuan & Yuan, Yue & Zhang, Li & Duan, Lian & Zhang, Weiyong, 2018. "The coupling relationship between standard development and technology advancement: A game theoretical perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 169-177.
    5. María Isabel Saz-Gil & José Paulo Cosenza & Anabel Zardoya-Alegría & Ana I. Gil-Lacruz, 2020. "Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility under the Background of Sustainable Development Goals: A Proposal to Corporate Volunteering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Diego Winkelried & Bruno Escobar, 2022. "Declining inequality in Latin America? Robustness checks for Peru," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(1), pages 223-243, March.
    7. Adriano Mesquita Soares & João Luiz Kovaleski & Silvia Gaia & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli, 2020. "Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer Offices: An Approach Based on Levels of Maturity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Blien, Uwe & Dauth, Wolfgang & Roth, Duncan H.W., 2021. "Occupational routine intensity and the costs of job loss: evidence from mass layoffs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Diana Ingenhoff & Katharina Sommer, 2010. "Trust in Companies and in CEOs: A Comparative Study of the Main Influences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 339-355, September.
    10. Orkhan Nadirov & Khatai Aliyev & Bruce Dehning & Ilaha Sharifzada & Rafiga Aliyeva, 2021. "Life Satisfaction and Tax Morale in Azerbaijan: Mediating Role of Institutional Trust and Financial Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-10, November.
    11. Diogo Signor & Jongsung Kim & Edinaldo Tebaldi, 2019. "Persistence and determinants of income inequality: The Brazilian case," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 1748-1767, November.
    12. ., 2018. "The fourth industrial revolution," Chapters, in: Industrial Policy for the Manufacturing Revolution, chapter 3, pages 49-78, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Jihong Chen & Kai Zhang & Yuan Zhou & Yufei Liu & Lingfeng Li & Zheng Chen & Li Yin, 2019. "Exploring the Development of Research, Technology and Business of Machine Tool Domain in New-Generation Information Technology Environment Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-38, June.
    14. Harwood, Stephen & Eaves, Sally, 2020. "Conceptualising technology, its development and future: The six genres of technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Yuanyuan Gu & Arne Risa Hole & Stephanie Knox, 2013. "Fitting the generalized multinomial logit model in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(2), pages 382-397, June.
    16. Michael Neubert & Augustinus Stijn Krogt, 2019. "Decision-makers impact on the internationalization of high-technology firms in emerging markets," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Tiéfigué Pierrette Coulibaly & Jianguo Du & Daniel Diakité & Olivier Joseph Abban & Elvis Kouakou, 2021. "A Proposed Conceptual Framework on the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The Role of Network Contact Frequency and Institutional Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Arik Sadeh & Claudia Florina Radu & Cristina Feniser & Andrei Borşa, 2020. "Governmental Intervention and Its Impact on Growth, Economic Development, and Technology in OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, December.
    19. Horak, Sven & Yang, Inju, 2016. "Affective networks, informal ties, and the limits of expatriate effectiveness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1030-1042.
    20. Ni Wayan Masri & Jun-Jer You & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Effects of Customer Learning and Shopping Value on Intention Purchase and Reuse in a Digital Market: The Institutional Trust–Commitment Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    21. Hanna Silvola & Eija Vinnari, 2021. "The limits of institutional work: a field study on auditors' efforts to promote sustainability assurance in a trust society," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 1-30, September.
    22. Fabrice Murtin & Lara Fleischer & Vincent Siegerink & Arnstein Aassve & Yann Algan & Romina Boarini & Santiago González & Zsuzsanna Lonti & Gianluca Grimalda & Rafael Hortala Vallve & Soonhee Kim & Da, 2018. "Trust and its determinants: Evidence from the Trustlab experiment," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2018/2, OECD Publishing.
    23. Edward C. Norton & Hua Wang & Chunrong Ai, 2004. "Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(2), pages 154-167, June.
    24. Michael Siegrist, 2021. "Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 480-490, March.
    25. Nico Seifert, 2018. "Yet Another Case of Nordic Exceptionalism? Extending Existing Evidence for a Causal Relationship Between Institutional and Social Trust to the Netherlands and Switzerland," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 539-555, April.
    26. Feige, David & Vonortas, Nicholas S., 2017. "Context appropriate technologies for development: Choosing for the future," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 219-226.
    27. Tainá A Bittencourt & Mariana Giannotti & Eduardo Marques, 2021. "Cumulative (and self-reinforcing) spatial inequalities: Interactions between accessibility and segregation in four Brazilian metropolises," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1989-2005, September.
    28. Weber, Manuela, 2008. "The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 247-261, August.
    29. Nuria Calvo & Flora Calvo, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and multiple agency theory: A case study of internal stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1223-1230, November.
    30. David C. Ling & Chongyu Wang & Tingyu Zhou, 2021. "Institutional common ownership and firm value: Evidence from real estate investment trusts," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(1), pages 187-223, March.
    31. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-02-2019-3890 is not listed on IDEAS
    32. Ishtiaq Jamil & Hasan Muhammad Baniamin, 2021. "How culture may nurture institutional trust: Insights from Bangladesh and Nepal," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(3), pages 419-434, May.
    33. Min Xu & Jeanne M. David & Suk Hi Kim, 2018. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 90-95, April.
    34. John Ishiyama & Melissa Martinez & Melda Ozsut, 2018. "Do “Resource‐Cursed States” Have Lower Levels of Social and Institutional Trust? Evidence from Africa and Latin America," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(3), pages 872-894, September.
    35. Cristina Longo & Avi Shankar & Peter Nuttall, 2019. "“It’s Not Easy Living a Sustainable Lifestyle”: How Greater Knowledge Leads to Dilemmas, Tensions and Paralysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 759-779, February.
    36. Giuliana Spadaro & Katharina Gangl & Jan-Willem Van Prooijen & Paul A M Van Lange & Cristina O Mosso, 2020. "Enhancing feelings of security: How institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Benassi & Elena Grinza & Francesco Rentocchini & Laura Rondi, 2022. "Patenting in 4IR technologies and firm performance [Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 112-136.
    2. Shet, Sateesh V. & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Paolo Morganti & Rosa Carolina Valdes, 2023. "The Perils of Asymmetrical Technological Changes in a Knowledge Economy with Complete Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Lordan, Grace & Stringer, Eliza-Jane, 2022. "People versus machines: The impact of being in an automatable job on Australian worker’s mental health and life satisfaction," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Modgil, Sachin & Gupta, Shivam & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Bhushan, Bharat, 2021. "Big data-enabled large-scale group decision making for circular economy: An emerging market context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Edward Simpson & David Bradley & John Palfreyman & Roger White, 2022. "Sustainable Society: Wellbeing and Technology—3 Case Studies in Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Jayaluxmi Naidoo & Sarasvathie Reddy, 2023. "Embedding Sustainable Mathematics Higher Education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era Post-COVID-19: Exploring Technology-Based Teaching Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. van Meeteren, Michiel & Trincado-Munoz, Francisco & Rubin, Tzameret H. & Vorley, Tim, 2022. "Rethinking the digital transformation in knowledge-intensive services: A technology space analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Markus Leibrecht & Hans Pitlik, 2018. "Is Trust in Companies Rooted in Social Trust, or Regulatory Quality, or Both?," John H Dunning Centre for International Business Discussion Papers jhd-dp2018-03, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    10. Yousueng Han & Narayan Aryal & Kwangseon Hwang, 2024. "Local governmentsʼ accountability and public trust in Nepal: Does participation make a difference?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), May.
    11. Gustavo Ferro & Carlos A. Romero & María Priscila Ramos, 2023. "Understanding Smart Grids," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 859, Universidad del CEMA.
    12. Behl, Abhishek & Singh, Ramandeep & Pereira, Vijay & Laker, Benjamin, 2023. "Analysis of Industry 4.0 and circular economy enablers: A step towards resilient sustainable operations management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Jarle Aarstad & Olav Andreas Kvitastein & Stig-Erik Jakobsen, 2019. "What Drives Enterprise Product Innovation? Assessing How Regional, National, And International Inter-Firm Collaboration Complement Or Substitute For R&D Investments," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Zvonimir Bašić & Parampreet C. Bindra & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Angelo Romano & Matthias Sutter & Claudia Zoller, 2021. "The Roots of Cooperation," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 097, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    15. Myint Moe Chit, 2018. "Political openness and the growth of small and medium enterprises: empirical evidence from transition economies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 781-804, September.
    16. Jarl G. Kallberg & Yoshiki Shimizu, 2023. "Acquisitions and the Opportunity Set," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 904-938, May.
    17. Melanie Lefevre, 2011. "Willingness-to-pay for Local Milk-based Dairy Product in Senegal," CREPP Working Papers 1108, Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et de la Population (CREPP) (Research Center on Public and Population Economics) HEC-Management School, University of Liège.
    18. Ek, Claes, 2017. "Some causes are more equal than others? The effect of similarity on substitution in charitable giving," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 45-62.
    19. Leopoldo Angrisani & Mauro D’Arco & Egidio De Benedetto & Luigi Duraccio & Fabrizio Lo Regio, 2023. "Broadband Power Line Communication in Railway Traction Lines: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Sakaue, Katsuki, 2018. "Informal fee charge and school choice under a free primary education policy: Panel data evidence from rural Uganda," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 112-127.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:628-:d:1019729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.