IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5657-d557109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Social Support for a Sustainable Adolescence: A Theoretical Model of Its Sources and Types

Author

Listed:
  • Arantzazu Rodríguez-Fernández

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Sports Faculty of Vitoria-Gasteiz, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Juan Ibañez de Sto. Domingo 1 Street, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Iker Izar-de-la-Fuente

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Sports Faculty of Vitoria-Gasteiz, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Juan Ibañez de Sto. Domingo 1 Street, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Naiara Escalante

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Sports Faculty of Vitoria-Gasteiz, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Juan Ibañez de Sto. Domingo 1 Street, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Lorea Azpiazu

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Philosophy and Anthropology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Tolosa Avenue 70 Street, 20018 San Sebastian, Spain)

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in perceived social support as a means of achieving sustainable psychological development and well-being in the various contexts of the adolescent, its definition and composition remain unclear. The aim of this study is to test both the hierarchical order and the types and sources of a theoretical model of the social support perceived by adolescents. The model is based on the theories of Tardy and Lin, as well as on the findings of recent studies on the construct. Three theoretical models are compared using the structural equations method. The participants were 1081 randomly selected secondary school students (aged 12–18 years) from the north of Spain, who completed the APIK Perceived Social Support Questionnaire. The model positing that perceived social support comprises a hierarchical first level formed by sources of support (family, friends and teachers) and a lower second level derived from the first one, formed by types of support (emotional, material and informational), proved to be the first-choice solution. The results establish a solid theoretical base for both future studies on perceived social support during adolescence and possible educational interventions designed to improve social support for teenagers.

Suggested Citation

  • Arantzazu Rodríguez-Fernández & Iker Izar-de-la-Fuente & Naiara Escalante & Lorea Azpiazu, 2021. "Perceived Social Support for a Sustainable Adolescence: A Theoretical Model of Its Sources and Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5657-:d:557109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annamaria Di Fabio & Donald H. Saklofske, 2019. "The Contributions of Personality Traits and Emotional Intelligence to Intrapreneurial Self-Capital: Key Resources for Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Meng Yin & Syed Muhammad Usman Tayyab & Xiao-Yu Xu & Shuo-Wei Jia & Chih-Lun Wu, 2021. "The Investigation of Mobile Health Stickiness: The Role of Social Support in a Sustainable Health Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Gabriella Nagy-Pénzes & Ferenc Vincze & Éva Bíró, 2020. "Contributing Factors in Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being—The Role of Socioeconomic Status, Social Support, and Health Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Gema Bagán & Ana M. Tur-Porcar & Anna Llorca, 2019. "Learning and Parenting in Spanish Environments: Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Self-Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. So Young Bae & Po-Ju Chang & Choong-Ki Lee, 2020. "Structural Relationships among Online Community Use, Parental Stress, Social Support, and Quality of Life between Korean and Taiwanese Employed Mothers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Chua Bee Seok & Harris Shah Abd Hamid & Jasmine Adela Mutang & Rosnah Ismail, 2018. "Psychometric Properties of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) among Malaysian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Ying-Hua Huang & Chen-Yu Sung & Wei Tong Chen & Shu-Shun Liu, 2021. "Relationships between Social Support, Social Status Perception, Social Identity, Work Stress, and Safety Behavior of Construction Site Management Personnel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Diego Bellini & Alberto Crescentini & Giovanna Zanolla & Serena Cubico & Giuseppe Favretto & Lorenzo Faccincani & Piermatteo Ardolino & Giovanna Gianesini, 2019. "Mathematical Competence Scale (MCS) for Primary School: The Psychometric Properties and the Validation of an Instrument to Enhance the Sustainability of Talents Development through the Numeracy Skills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Hamparsum Bozdogan, 1987. "Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 345-370, September.
    10. Piko, Bettina F. & Hamvai, Csaba, 2010. "Parent, school and peer-related correlates of adolescents' life satisfaction," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1479-1482, October.
    11. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2001. "A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 507-514, December.
    12. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    13. Gina Lee & Tae In Park & Hyojin Cho, 2020. "Maladaptive Perfectionism and College Adjustment of International Students in Korea: A Moderated Mediation Model of Social Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dalila Eslava & Carmela Martínez-Vispo & Víctor J. Villanueva-Blasco & José M. Errasti & Susana Al-Halabí, 2023. "Family Conflict and Suicidal Behaviour in Adolescence: The Mediating Role of the Assertive Interpersonal Schema," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-10, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    2. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.
    3. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Preferences for Driver Traveler Information Using Wireless Internet-enabled Devices," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt40q8h6sf, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Naiara Escalante Mateos & Eider Goñi Palacios & Arantza Fernández-Zabala & Iratxe Antonio-Agirre, 2020. "Internal Structure, Reliability and Invariance across Gender Using the Multidimensional School Climate Scale PACE-33," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Jung, Hyekyung & Schafer, Joseph L. & Seo, Byungtae, 2011. "A latent class selection model for nonignorably missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 802-812, January.
    6. Barbara Loera & Daniela Converso & Sara Viotti, 2014. "Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) among Italian Nurses: How Many Factors Must a Researcher Consider?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. repec:jss:jstsof:06:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lin Ting Hsiang, 2006. "A comparison of model selection indices for nested latent class models," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 239-259, October.
    9. Wedel, Michel & Böckenholt, Ulf & Kamakura, Wagner A., 2003. "Factor models for multivariate count data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 356-369, November.
    10. Isabel Martínez & Fernando Garcia & María C. Fuentes & Feliciano Veiga & Oscar F. Garcia & Yara Rodrigues & Edie Cruise & Emilia Serra, 2019. "Researching Parental Socialization Styles across Three Cultural Contexts: Scale ESPA29 Bi-Dimensional Validity in Spain, Portugal, and Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Pendharkar, Parag C., 2006. "Scale economies and production function estimation for object-oriented software component and source code documentation size," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(3), pages 1040-1050, August.
    12. Koufteros, Xenophon & Lu, Guanyi & Peters, Richard C. & Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2014. "Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: A mediational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 83-97.
    13. Yang, Chih-Chien, 2006. "Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 1090-1104, February.
    14. Ando, Tomohiro, 2009. "Bayesian factor analysis with fat-tailed factors and its exact marginal likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(8), pages 1717-1726, September.
    15. GONZALO, Jesus & PITARAKIS, Jean-Yves, 1994. "Comovements in Large Systems," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1994065, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. Qi Yuan & Tee Hng Tan & Peizhi Wang & Fiona Devi & Hui Lin Ong & Edimansyah Abdin & Magadi Harish & Richard Goveas & Li Ling Ng & Siow Ann Chong & Mythily Subramaniam, 2020. "Staging dementia based on caregiver reported patient symptoms: Implications from a latent class analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    17. Marc Blais & Ursula Hess & Andrea S. Riddle, 2002. "Static Versus Dynamic Structural Models of Depression: The Case of the CES-D," CIRANO Working Papers 2002s-37, CIRANO.
    18. Po-Hsien Huang, 2017. "Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 407-426, June.
    19. Tuan, Luu Trong & Ngan, Vu Thanh, 2021. "Leading ethically to shape service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior among tourism salespersons: Dual mediation paths and moderating role of service role identity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Qi Chen & Wen Luo & Gregory J. Palardy & Ryan Glaman & Amber McEnturff, 2017. "The Efficacy of Common Fit Indices for Enumerating Classes in Growth Mixture Models When Nested Data Structure Is Ignored," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440177, March.
    21. Roy Levy & Gregory R. Hancock, 2011. "An Extended Model Comparison Framework for Covariance and Mean Structure Models, Accommodating Multiple Groups and Latent Mixtures," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(2), pages 256-278, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5657-:d:557109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.