IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i3p94-d840410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dyadic Analysis of a Speed-Dating Format between Farmers and Citizens

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Berkes

    (Department of Agriculture, South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences, Lübecker Ring 2, 59494 Soest, Germany)

  • Iris Schröter

    (Department of Agriculture, South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences, Lübecker Ring 2, 59494 Soest, Germany)

  • Marcus Mergenthaler

    (Department of Agriculture, South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences, Lübecker Ring 2, 59494 Soest, Germany)

Abstract

Alienation between farmers and citizens has increased amid complex developments of agriculture’s intensification, urbanization processes, demographic change, and specialization in food supply chains in developed countries. Traditional public relations instruments have failed to generate societal acceptance of today’s intensive agricultural practices. At the same time, the agricultural sector feels alienated from societal value changes. Other controversial contexts showed that open face-to-face encounters at eye level hold the potential to promote mutual understanding and acceptance. The study aims to analyze how speed-dating conversations between farmers and citizens, considering participants’ characteristics, impact different outcome variables. 24 farmers and 22 citizens specifically recruited for participation in the speed-dating were organized to have short conversations of 10–15 min in different farmer-citizen-constellations. Each conversation had a specific overall agricultural topic including animal welfare, agricultural technology, environmental protection, agricultural policy, and esteem for food. Four months after, different outcomes were measured in a follow-up survey. For 84 person-constellations complete dyadic data were available to be analyzed by hierarchical regression analyses. Participants were mostly satisfied with the dialogue format and gained new factual and personal information. Results indicate stronger impacts of socio-demographic characteristics and personality traits than characteristics of the conversations themselves. Constellations with male citizens, female farmers, more educated farmers, extroverted participants, emotionally stable farmers, and more open participants tended to have higher dyadic outcome variable values. The results call for a re-design of farmer-citizen dialogue formats to facilitate more direct interpersonal communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Berkes & Iris Schröter & Marcus Mergenthaler, 2022. "Dyadic Analysis of a Speed-Dating Format between Farmers and Citizens," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:94-:d:840410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/3/94/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/3/94/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiller, Achim & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Sonntag, Winnie, 2016. "Gibt es eine Zukunft für die moderne konventionelle Tierhaltung in Nordwesteuropa?," DARE Discussion Papers 1608, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Berkes, Jessica & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2020. "Speed-Datings zwischen Menschen aus der Landwirtschaft und der Gesellschaft als neues Dialogformat: Eine kommunikationswissenschaftliche Untersuchung," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305601, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Brinson, Ayeisha & Lee, Min-Yang & Rountree, Barbara, 2011. "Direct marketing strategies: The rise of community supported fishery programs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 542-548, July.
    4. Mehlhose, Clara & Hunecke, Claudia & Spiller, Achim & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2019. "Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse im Jahr 2018," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(Supplemen), March.
    5. Guenther, Patricia M. & Jensen, Helen H. & Batres-Marquez, S. Patricia & Chen, Chun-Fu, 2005. "Sociodemographic, Knowledge and Attitudinal Factors Related to Meat Consumption in the U.S," ISU General Staff Papers 200508010700001212, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy & Rifkin, Will & Louis, Winnifred & Moffat, Kieren, 2017. "Meaningful dialogue outcomes contribute to laying a foundation for social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 347-355.
    7. Steve Baron & Anthony Patterson & Kim Harris & Julia Hodgson, 2007. "Strangers in the night: speeddating, CCI and service businesses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 1(3), pages 211-232, September.
    8. Amory Starr & Adrian Card & Carolyn Benepe & Garry Auld & Dennis Lamm & Ken Smith & Karen Wilken, 2003. "Sustaining local agriculture Barriers and opportunities to direct marketing between farms and restaurants in Colorado," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 20(3), pages 301-321, September.
    9. Grebitus, Carola & Printezis, Iryna & Printezis, Antonios, 2017. "Relationship between Consumer Behavior and Success of Urban Agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 189-200.
    10. Rovers, Anja & Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Brümmer, Nanke & Saggau, Doreen, 2017. "Trust no One? Citizens’ Concerns regarding the Pork and Dairy Supply Chain," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berkes, Jessica & Schröter, Iris & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2021. "Dyadic Analysis of a Speed-Dating Format between Farmers and Citizens: Impacts of Conversations’ and Participants’ Characteristics on Outcome Indicators after Four Months," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315202, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Construction and Validation of a Sustainable Tourism Development Evaluation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Printezis, Iryna & Grebitus, Carola, 2018. "Marketing Channels for Local Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 161-171.
    4. Wildraut, Christiane & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2017. "Technik Als Beitrag Für Mehr Tierwohl In Der Schweinehaltung Aus Sicht Von Landwirten," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 262001, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Shawn A. Trivette, 2017. "Invoices on scraps of paper: trust and reciprocity in local food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 529-542, September.
    6. Bernard, Kévin & Bonein, Aurélie & Bougherara, Douadia, 2020. "Consumer inequality aversion and risk preferences in community supported agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. G. Debucquet & P. Guillotreau & G. Lazuech & F. Salladarré & J. Troiville, 2020. "Sense of belonging and commitment to a community-supported fishery. The case of Yeu Island, France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 439-459, December.
    8. Cruz, Thiago Leite & Matlaba, Valente José & Mota, José Aroudo & Filipe dos Santos, Jorge, 2021. "Measuring the social license to operate of the mining industry in an Amazonian town: A case study of Canaã dos Carajás, Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Saenz, Cesar, 2021. "Community partnership and ownership as key factors of community strategies. A Peruvian case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Patterson, Anthony, 2012. "Social-networkers of the world, unite and take over: A meta-introspective perspective on the Facebook brand," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 527-534.
    11. Ollier, Carla & Berkes, Jessica & Faletar, Ivica & Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2021. "Wie bewerten LandwirtInnen und BürgerInnen die Geflügelhaltung? - Sichtweisen aus Eins-zu-Eins-Gesprächen," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317086, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    12. Hemeng Zhou & Kathrin Specht & Caitlin K. Kirby, 2022. "Consumers’ and Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Indoor Agritecture in Shanghai (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Wiśniewska-Paluszak, J. & Paluszak, G. & Fiore, M. & Coticchio, A. & Galati, A. & Lira, J., 2023. "Urban agriculture business models and value propositions: Mixed methods approach based on evidence from Polish and Italian case studies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    14. Salladarré, Frédéric & Guillotreau, Patrice & Debucquet, Gervaise & Lazuech, Gilles, 2018. "Some Good Reasons for Buying Fish Exclusively From Community-Supported Fisheries: The Case of Yeu Island in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 172-180.
    15. Berkes, Jessica & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2020. "Speed-Datings zwischen Menschen aus der Landwirtschaft und der Gesellschaft als neues Dialogformat: Eine kommunikationswissenschaftliche Untersuchung," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305601, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    16. Magdalena Raftowicz & Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska & Mirosław Struś, 2021. "The Implementation of CSA Model in Aquaculture Management in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Olson, Julia & Clay, Patricia M. & Pinto da Silva, Patricia, 2014. "Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 104-111.
    18. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Qureshi, Salman & Tarashkar, Mahsa & Matloobi, Mansour & Wang, Zhifang & Rahimi, Akbar, 2022. "Understanding the dynamics of urban horticulture by socially-oriented practices and populace perception: Seeking future outlook through a comprehensive review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    20. Schulze, Maureen & Risius, Antje & Spiller, Achim, 2018. "Heimliche Stallaufnahmen aus gesellschaftlicher Sicht im Wechselspiel zwischen Landwirtschaft, Tierschutzorganisationen und staatlichen Kontrollmechanismen," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(4), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:94-:d:840410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.