IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v127y2023ics0264837723000285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban agriculture business models and value propositions: Mixed methods approach based on evidence from Polish and Italian case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Wiśniewska-Paluszak, J.
  • Paluszak, G.
  • Fiore, M.
  • Coticchio, A.
  • Galati, A.
  • Lira, J.

Abstract

Nowadays, trends related to alternative promotion options for small farmers in changing agri-food supply chains stand out. Urban Agriculture (UA) is a multifaceted system ranging from traditional production, processing, distribution, and consumption to a collection of new and less imagined goods and services. UA generally differs from conventional food chains in the origins, the place of production, and the production conditions. This paper focuses on an aspect less addressed by previous research: the analysis of strategic business models adopted by urban farm (UF) practitioners. The work uses a meta-model called Business Model Canvas (BMC), expanding on it with Value Proposition Canvas (VPC) model to explore how they communicate value to target customers and different market segments. Accordingly, in-depth interviews and participant observation were conducted from February 2020 – to February 2021 to gather extensive qualitative information. We selected two European economies in Eastern and Western Europe, Poland and Italy, with different UA relevance and functionality, to better identify potential UF business models. We identified three UF business strategies: service-oriented, product-oriented and land-use-oriented. UFs are gaining traction by impacting beyond financial and economic significance. The new value proposition is a powerful way to create a broader customer base and develop innovative product and service solutions to deliver unique value. It is a development path for UFs and urban agglomerations’ sustainable development. This study led to the conceptualization of the cross-cultural business meta-model of UF. It recognizes UFs as distinct entities with diverse functions and value propositions and informs the emergent UA theory and practical applications in UFs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiśniewska-Paluszak, J. & Paluszak, G. & Fiore, M. & Coticchio, A. & Galati, A. & Lira, J., 2023. "Urban agriculture business models and value propositions: Mixed methods approach based on evidence from Polish and Italian case studies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723000285
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723000285
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasz Kusio & Mariantonietta Fiore, 2022. "Which Stakeholders’ Sector Matters in Rural Development? That Is the Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Wojciech Sroka & Dariusz Żmija, 2021. "Farming Systems Changes in the Urban Shadow: A Mixed Approach Based on Statistical Analysis and Expert Surveys," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Pölling, Bernd & Sroka, Wojciech & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2017. "Success of urban farming’s city-adjustments and business models—Findings from a survey among farmers in Ruhr Metropolis, Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 372-385.
    4. Maria Cecilia Mancini & Davide Menozzi & Michele Donati & Beatrice Biasini & Mario Veneziani & Filippo Arfini, 2019. "Producers’ and Consumers’ Perception of the Sustainability of Short Food Supply Chains: The Case of Parmigiano Reggiano PDO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Rattan Lal, 2020. "Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(4), pages 871-876, August.
    6. J. Heyink & Tj. Tymstra, 1993. "The function of qualitative research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 291-305, July.
    7. Chandra, Amanda Jennifer & Diehl, Jessica Ann, 2019. "Urban agriculture, food security, and development policies in Jakarta: A case study of farming communities at Kalideres – Cengkareng district, West Jakarta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Sterns, James A. & Schweikhardt, David B. & Peterson, H. Christopher, 1998. "Using Case Studies As An Approach For Conducting Agribusiness Research," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(3), pages 1-17.
    9. Shafer, Scott M. & Smith, H. Jeff & Linder, Jane C., 2005. "The power of business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 199-207.
    10. Sroka, Wojciech & Bojarszczuk, Jolanta & Satoła, Łukasz & Szczepańska, Barbara & Sulewski, Piotr & Lisek, Sławomir & Luty, Lidia & Zioło, Monika, 2021. "Understanding residents’ acceptance of professional urban and peri-urban farming: A socio-economic study in Polish metropolitan areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. André Ruoppolo Biazoti & Angélica Campos Nakamura & Gustavo Nagib & Vitória Oliveira Pereira de Souza Leão & Giulia Giacchè & Thais Mauad, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Urban Agriculture in São Paulo, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Shingo Yoshida & Hironori Yagi & Akira Kiminami & Guy Garrod, 2019. "Farm Diversification and Sustainability of Multifunctional Peri-Urban Agriculture: Entrepreneurial Attributes of Advanced Diversification in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Maria Partalidou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Marco Vieri & Stefania Lombardo & Anastasios Michailidis, 2018. "Business model canvas analysis on Greek farms implementing Precision Agriculture," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 19(2), January.
    15. Maro Vlachopoulou & Christos Ziakis & Kostas Vergidis & Michael Madas, 2021. "Analyzing AgriFood-Tech e-Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Grebitus, Carola & Printezis, Iryna & Printezis, Antonios, 2017. "Relationship between Consumer Behavior and Success of Urban Agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 189-200.
    17. Orlando Cimino & Marco Vassallo & Roberto Henke & Francesco Vanni, 2021. "Income Diversification Strategies of Italian Peri-Urban Farms: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Amoussohoui, Rico & Arouna, Aminou & Bavorova, Miroslava & Tsangari, Haritini & Banout, Jan, 2022. "An extended Canvas business model: A tool for sustainable technology transfer and adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Louw, Andre & Jordaan, Daniel du Plessis Scheepers & Ndanga, Leah Z.B. & Kirsten, Johann F., 2008. "Alternative marketing options for small-scale farmers in the wake of changing agri-food supply chains in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(3), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Iuliana M. CHITAC, 2022. "The Rationale For Saturation In Qualitative Research: When Practice Informs Theory," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 29-35, July.
    21. Sttefanie Yenitza Escobar-López & Santiago Amaya-Corchuelo & Angélica Espinoza-Ortega, 2021. "Alternative Food Networks: Perceptions in Short Food Supply Chains in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    22. Giuseppe Pulighe & Flavio Lupia, 2020. "Food First: COVID-19 Outbreak and Cities Lockdown a Booster for a Wider Vision on Urban Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-4, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wojciech Sroka & Piotr Sulewski & Jaroslaw Mikolajczyk & Karol Król, 2023. "Farming under Urban Pressure: Business Models and Success Factors of Peri-Urban Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Luiza Vigne Bennedetti & Paulo Antônio de Almeida Sinisgalli & Maurício Lamano Ferreira & Fabiano Lemes de Oliveira, 2023. "Challenges to Promote Sustainability in Urban Agriculture Models: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Qureshi, Salman & Tarashkar, Mahsa & Matloobi, Mansour & Wang, Zhifang & Rahimi, Akbar, 2022. "Understanding the dynamics of urban horticulture by socially-oriented practices and populace perception: Seeking future outlook through a comprehensive review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Tomas Baležentis & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Agnė Žičkienė & Artiom Volkov & Erika Ribašauskienė & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2021. "Policies for Rapid Mitigation of the Crisis’ Effects on Agricultural Supply Chains: A Multi-Criteria Decision Support System with Monte Carlo Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Marilyne Chicoine & Francine Rodier & Fabien Durif, 2023. "The bright and the dark side of commercial urban agriculture labeling," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1153-1170, September.
    6. Wojciech Sroka & Piotr Sulewski & Jaroslaw Mikolajczyk & Karol Król, 2023. "Farming under Urban Pressure: Business Models and Success Factors of Peri-Urban Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Akane Bessho & Toru Terada & Makoto Yokohari, 2020. "Immigrants’ “Role Shift” for Sustainable Urban Communities: A Case Study of Toronto’s Multiethnic Community Farm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Rosalia Stella Evola & Giovanni Peira & Erica Varese & Alessandro Bonadonna & Enrica Vesce, 2022. "Short Food Supply Chains in Europe: Scientific Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Wojciech Sroka & Dariusz Żmija, 2021. "Farming Systems Changes in the Urban Shadow: A Mixed Approach Based on Statistical Analysis and Expert Surveys," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Boglarka Z. Gulyas & Jill L. Edmondson, 2021. "Increasing City Resilience through Urban Agriculture: Challenges and Solutions in the Global North," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Grigorescu, Ines & Popovici, Elena-Ana & Damian, Nicoleta & Dumitraşcu, Monica & Sima, Mihaela & Mitrică, Bianca & Mocanu, Irena, 2022. "The resilience of sub-urban small farming in Bucharest Metropolitan Area in response to the COVID-19 pandemic," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. André Ruoppolo Biazoti & Angélica Campos Nakamura & Gustavo Nagib & Vitória Oliveira Pereira de Souza Leão & Giulia Giacchè & Thais Mauad, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Urban Agriculture in São Paulo, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Angela Huang & Fi-John Chang, 2021. "Prospects for Rooftop Farming System Dynamics: An Action to Stimulate Water-Energy-Food Nexus Synergies toward Green Cities of Tomorrow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Dionysis Bochtis & Lefteris Benos & Maria Lampridi & Vasso Marinoudi & Simon Pearson & Claus G. Sørensen, 2020. "Agricultural Workforce Crisis in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Nadežda Jankelová & Juraj Mišún, 2021. "Key Competencies of Agricultural Managers in the Acute Stage of the COVID-19 Crisis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Altair Dias de Moura & Sandra Martin & Diane Mollenkopf, 2009. "Product specification and agribusiness chain coordination: introducing the coordination differential concept," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 112-127.
    17. Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Edward Majewski & Adam Wąs & Svein Ole Borgen & Peter Csillag & Michele Donati & Richard Freeman & Viet Hoàng & Jean-Loup Lecoeur & Maria Cecilia Mancini & An Nguyen & Monia , 2019. "Measuring the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability of Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Ana Maria Ifrim & Ramona Camelia Silvestru & Monica Ioana Toader, 2021. "Improving Business Processes in a Construction Project and Increasing Performance by Using Target Costing," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    19. Gheorghe Cristian Popescu & Monica Popescu, 2022. "COVID-19 pandemic and agriculture in Romania: effects on agricultural systems, compliance with restrictions and relations with authorities," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 557-567, April.
    20. Massa, Silvia & Testa, Stefania, 2011. "Beyond the conventional-specialty dichotomy in food retailing business models: An Italian case study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 476-482.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723000285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.