IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rae/jouraf/v101y2020i4p439-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sense of belonging and commitment to a community-supported fishery. The case of Yeu Island, France

Author

Listed:
  • G. Debucquet

    (AUDENCIA Business School, 8 route de la Jonelière, 44300 Nantes Cedex 3, France)

  • P. Guillotreau

    (LEMNA, Université de Nantes, Chemin de la Censive du Tertre, BP 52231, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France)

  • G. Lazuech

    (CENS, UFR de Sociologie, Université de Nantes, 340 Rue du Fresche Blanc, 44300 Nantes, France)

  • F. Salladarré

    (LEMNA, Université de Nantes, Chemin de la Censive du Tertre, BP 52231, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France
    CNRS, CREM - UMR 6211, Univ Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France)

  • J. Troiville

    (CNRS, CREM - UMR 6211, Univ Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France)

Abstract

Community-supported agriculture/fisheries (CSA/CSF) create both market and nonmarket values, including environmental and social benefits. When shared by a community of users, these values generate identity and sense of belonging for the members who are prone to accept conditions they would not bear in conventional markets (e.g., higher prices, inconvenient delivery time and location, lack of choice, and supply risk). We argue that longevity of CSA/CSF depends on their capacity to create such a sense of belonging. For this reason and because of some CSF peculiarities compared to CSA, analyzing the sense of belonging to a CSF becomes an interesting challenge to understand the nature and extent of the community and its underlying social characteristics and motives. A qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology was used. Data come from an original online survey of 556 French seafood consumers belonging to the Yeu Island CSF, and from individual, semi-directive interviews. An ordered probit model with endogenous treatment effects for commitment experience was developed, and the evidence of results was related with a content analysis from qualitative materials. The sense of belonging to CSF is positively influenced by the relational dimension and negatively by the demand for high-quality goods, but not by the credence attributes (support of fishers and the local economy, origin of products, environmental outcomes…). Moreover, commitment as volunteer member tends to have a positive influence on belongingness. Interviews with members highlight the social and cultural entanglement of their relationship. They show notably the importance of the sociability built around fish – leading to an increase of knowledge around species, ways of cooking, and to the strengthening of a food identity – on the sense of belonging. The long-term sustainability of CSF may highly depend on these relational dimensions, acting as cohesive factors in the community.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Debucquet & P. Guillotreau & G. Lazuech & F. Salladarré & J. Troiville, 2020. "Sense of belonging and commitment to a community-supported fishery. The case of Yeu Island, France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 439-459.
  • Handle: RePEc:rae:jouraf:v:101:y:2020:i:4:p:439-459
    DOI: 10.1007/s41130-020-00101-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-020-00101-3
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41130-020-00101-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Hérault-Fournier & Aurélie Merle & Anne-Hélène Prigent-Simonin, 2014. "Diagnostiquer la proximité perçue en vente directe de produits alimentaires," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02392499, HAL.
    2. Brinson, Ayeisha & Lee, Min-Yang & Rountree, Barbara, 2011. "Direct marketing strategies: The rise of community supported fishery programs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 542-548, July.
    3. Mary Douglas & Aaron Wildavsky, 1982. "How Can We Know the Risks We Face? Why Risk Selection Is a Social Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 49-58, June.
    4. Bougherara, Douadia & Grolleau, Gilles & Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2009. "Buy local, pollute less: What drives households to join a community supported farm?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1488-1495, March.
    5. Christian A. Gregory, 2015. "Estimating treatment effects for ordered outcomes using maximum simulated likelihood," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(3), pages 756-774, September.
    6. Ronan Le Velly & Ivan Dufeu, 2016. "Alternative food networks as “market agencements ”: Exploring their multiple hybridities," Post-Print hal-02794328, HAL.
    7. Salladarré, Frédéric & Guillotreau, Patrice & Debucquet, Gervaise & Lazuech, Gilles, 2018. "Some Good Reasons for Buying Fish Exclusively From Community-Supported Fisheries: The Case of Yeu Island in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 172-180.
    8. Catherine Hérault-Fournier & Aurélie Merle & Anne-Hélène Prigent-Simonin, 2014. "Diagnostiquer la proximité perçue en vente directe de produits alimentaires," Post-Print hal-02392499, HAL.
    9. Mikaël Akimowicz & Richard Vyn & Harry Cummings & Karen Landman, 2018. "An introduction to mixed methods research in agricultural economics: The example of farm investment in Ontario's Greenbelt, Canada," Post-Print hal-02328930, HAL.
    10. Bloemmen, Marjolijn & Bobulescu, Roxana & Le, Nhu Tuyen & Vitari, Claudio, 2015. "Microeconomic degrowth: The case of Community Supported Agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 110-115.
    11. Greene,William H. & Hensher,David A., 2010. "Modeling Ordered Choices," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521194204.
    12. Nhu Tuyên Lê & Marjolijn Bloemmen & Roxana Bobulescu & Claudio Vitari, 2015. "Microeconomic degrowth: The case of Community Supported Agriculture," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923276, HAL.
    13. Christian Gregory, 2015. "Estimating Treatment Effects for Ordered Outcomes Using Maximum Simulated Likelihood," 2015 Stata Conference 2, Stata Users Group.
    14. Martha A. Starr, 2014. "Qualitative And Mixed-Methods Research In Economics: Surprising Growth, Promising Future," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 238-264, April.
    15. Sundararajan, Arun, 2016. "The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262034573, April.
    16. Nhu Tuyên Lê & Marjolijn Bloemmen & Roxana Bobulescu & Claudio Vitari, 2015. "Microeconomic degrowth: The case of Community Supported Agriculture," Post-Print halshs-01923276, HAL.
    17. Bernard Cova & Veronique Cova, 2002. "Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing," Post-Print hal-01822665, HAL.
    18. Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa & Taylor, Mykel R. & Baudouin, Quentin, 2015. "Preferences of locavores favoring community supported agriculture in the United States and France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-73.
    19. Kates, Steven M, 2002. "The Protean Quality of Subcultural Consumption: An Ethnographic Account of Gay Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 383-399, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salladarré, Frédéric & Guillotreau, Patrice & Debucquet, Gervaise & Lazuech, Gilles, 2018. "Some Good Reasons for Buying Fish Exclusively From Community-Supported Fisheries: The Case of Yeu Island in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 172-180.
    2. Marie Diekmann & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2019. "Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 733-746, December.
    3. Wellner, Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "Community Supported Agriculture Als Neuer Impuls Für Die Regionalvermarktung? Stand Der Forschung Und Abgrenzung Von Anderen Alternativen Lebensmittelnetzwerken," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244757, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Wellner, Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2018. "Community Supported Agriculture – Determinanten Der Teilnah-Mebereitschaft Deutscher Landwirte," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 276223, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & De Schutter, Olivier & Hudon, Marek & Mathijs, Erik & Annaert, Bernd & Avermaete, Tessa & Bleeckx, Thomas & de Callataÿ, Charlotte & De Snijder, Pepijn & Fernández-Wulff, Paula &, 2017. "The Governance Features of Social Enterprise and Social Network Activities of Collective Food Buying Groups," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 123-135.
    6. Isabel Miralles & Domenico Dentoni & Stefano Pascucci, 2017. "Understanding the organization of sharing economy in agri-food systems: evidence from alternative food networks in Valencia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 833-854, December.
    7. Chakori, Sabrina & Aziz, Ammar Abdul & Smith, Carl & Dargusch, Paul, 2021. "Untangling the underlying drivers of the use of single-use food packaging," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Antoni-Komar, Irene & Rommel, Marius & Posse, Dirk & Wittkamp, Moritz & Paech, Niko, 2021. "Stable Schools in der Solidarischen Landwirtschaft. Ein transdisziplinäres Setting zur Förderung organisationaler Stabilität," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317057, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    9. Katarina Buhr & Karolina Isaksson & Pernilla Hagbert, 2018. "Local Interpretations of Degrowth—Actors, Arenas and Attempts to Influence Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Froese, Tobias & Richter, Markus & Hofmann, Florian & Lüdeke-Freund, Florian, 2023. "Degrowth-oriented organisational value creation: A systematic literature review of case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    11. Lehtonen, Markku & de Carlo, Laurence, 2019. "Community energy and the virtues of mistrust and distrust: Lessons from Brighton and Hove energy cooperatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Joutsenvirta, Maria, 2016. "A practice approach to the institutionalization of economic degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 23-32.
    13. Akbulut, Bengi & Adaman, Fikret, 2020. "The Ecological Economics of Economic Democracy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Roxana Bobulescu & Nhu Tuyên Lê & Claudio Vitari & Erin Whittingham, 2018. "Socio-economic and ecological transition in community supported agriculture: from the 'transitional' to the 'ideal' CSA," Post-Print halshs-01923235, HAL.
    15. Stefano Poponi & Gabriella Arcese & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Francesco Pacchera & Olimpia Martucci & Grazia Chiara Elmo, 2021. "Multi-Actor Governance for a Circular Economy in the Agri-Food Sector: Bio-Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Alcock, Rowan, 2019. "The New Rural Reconstruction Movement: A Chinese degrowth style movement?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 261-269.
    17. Wellbrock Wanja & Daniela Ludin & Ludwig Lisa N & Muhlfeld & Kristina, 2020. "Sustainable agriculture trough regional solidary in global markets," Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander, vol. 6(1), pages 01-10.
    18. Åsa Nyblom & Karolina Isaksson & Mark Sanctuary & Aurore Fransolet & Peter Stigson, 2019. "Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Roxana Bobulescu & Nhu Tuyên Lê & Claudio Vitari & Erin Whittingham, 2018. "Socio-economic and ecological transition in community supported agriculture: from the 'transitional' to the 'ideal' CSA," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923235, HAL.
    20. Estapé-Dubreuil, Glòria & Ashta, Arvind & Hédou, Jean-Pierre, 2016. "Micro-equity for sustainable development: Selection, monitoring and exit strategies of micro-angels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 117-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rae:jouraf:v:101:y:2020:i:4:p:439-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Saux-Nogues (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.