IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i4p124-d224410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Culture of Manufacturing Enterprises: A Possible Way to Adaptation to Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Pavol Durana

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Pavol Kral

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Vojtech Stehel

    (School of Expertness and Valuation, The Institute of Technology and Business in Ceske Budejovice, 3701 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)

  • George Lazaroiu

    (Department of Social-Human Sciences, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, Spiru Haret University, 041916 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Wlodzimierz Sroka

    (Management Department, University of Dabrowa Gornicza, 41-300 Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland)

Abstract

The concept of Industry 4.0 means a new paradigm of modern manufacturing. This phenomenon requires continuous innovation processes and technological development from each enterprise. Traditional concepts of quality must absorb changes and prepare themselves for new challenges. The studies linked to successful adaptation to Industry 4.0 focus mostly on technical dimensions and forget the impact of organisational culture. One should, however, remember that quality culture plays a crucial role in the organisational culture of manufacturing enterprises with elements of quality management implemented. Developed quality cultures support the innovation environment, which is why it is necessary for the enterprises to identify the current level of their quality culture and detect significant factors that differentiate individual quality cultures and focus on them. Given this fact, the aim of the paper is to analyse the typical cultures and quality concepts and to detect the factors that differentiate individual quality cultures in Slovakia. We use data from our own survey; dependences were indicated by means of correspondence analysis and the test of proportion. The improvement and assurance of quality, the use of information and the overall effectiveness are significant factors detected by the discriminant analysis. The conclusions of the survey may be used by scientific researchers but especially by manufacturing enterprises interested in quality which are coming to terms with the era of Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavol Durana & Pavol Kral & Vojtech Stehel & George Lazaroiu & Wlodzimierz Sroka, 2019. "Quality Culture of Manufacturing Enterprises: A Possible Way to Adaptation to Industry 4.0," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:4:p:124-:d:224410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/4/124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/4/124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bourke, Jane & Roper, Stephen, 2017. "Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1505-1518.
    2. Carl Gaigné & Bruno Larue, 2016. "Quality Standards, Industry Structure, and Welfare in a Global Economy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1432-1449.
    3. Miklós Pakurár & Hossam Haddad & János Nagy & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2019. "The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Armenia Androniceanu, 2017. "The Three-Dimensional Approach of Total Quality Management, an Essential Strategic Option for Business Excellence," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 1-61, February.
    5. Ishtiaq Ahmad & Judit Oláh & József Popp & Domicián Máté, 2018. "Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    7. Dominika Moravcikova & Anna Krizanova & Jana Kliestikova & Martina Rypakova, 2017. "Green Marketing as the Source of the Competitive Advantage of the Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Iqbal, Anam & Asrar-ul-Haq, Muhammad, 2018. "Establishing relationship between TQM practices and employee performance: The mediating role of change readiness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 62-68.
    9. Sujová Andrea & Remeň Ondrej, 2018. "Management of changes in business processes: an empirical study in Slovak enterprises," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 37-50, September.
    10. Liviu ILIES & Horatiu Catalin SALAGEAN & Florin ESTEFAN, 2015. "The Impact Of Quality Culture On Customer Relationship. Empirical Study In The Industrial Companies From The North-West Of Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 758-766, November.
    11. Georgescu Bogdan & Moise Daniel & Cruceru Anca Francisca, 2018. "Total Quality Management from the Perspective of Organizational Culture," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 37-42, July.
    12. Rabeea Sadaf & Judit Oláh & József Popp & Domicián Máté, 2018. "An Investigation of the Influence of the Worldwide Governance and Competitiveness on Accounting Fraud Cases: A Cross-Country Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Siderska Julia & Jadaan Khair S., 2018. "Cloud manufacturing: a service-oriented manufacturing paradigm. A review paper," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 22-31, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Palash Saha & Subrata Talapatra & H. M. Belal & Victoria Jackson, 2022. "Unleashing the Potential of the TQM and Industry 4.0 to Achieve Sustainability Performance in the Context of a Developing Country," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 495-513, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavol KRAL & Katarina JANOSKOVA & Tomas KLIESTIK, 2018. "Key Determinants Of The Public Transport User’S Satisfaction," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 36-51, December.
    2. Podhorska Ivana & Valaskova Katarina & Stehel Vojtech & Kliestik Tomas, 2019. "Possibility of Company Goodwill Valuation: Verification in Slovak and Czech Republic," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(3), pages 338-356, September.
    3. Sehrish Atif & Shehzad Ahmed & Muhammad Wasim & Bassam Zeb & Zeeshan Pervez & Lorraine Quinn, 2021. "Towards a Conceptual Development of Industry 4.0, Servitisation, and Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Sayyed Sadaqat Hussain Shah & Muhammad Asif Khan & Natanya Meyer & Daniel F. Meyer & Judit Oláh, 2019. "Does Herding Bias Drive the Firm Value? Evidence from the Chinese Equity Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Nestor Shpak & Ihor Kulyniak & Maryana Gvozd & Yuliya Malynovska & Włodzimierz Sroka, 2020. "Estimation of the Marketing Activity of Banking Structures," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(1), pages 229-242.
    6. Lubica Gajanova & Margareta Nadanyiova & George Lazaroiu, 2020. "Specifics in Brand Value Sources of Customers in the Banking Industry from the Psychographic Point of View," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 1-18.
    7. Shpak Nestor & Melnyk Olga & Adamiv Marta & Sroka Włodzimierz, 2020. "Modern Trends of Customs Administrations Formation: Best European Practices and a Unified Structure," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 189-211, June.
    8. Joanna Wyrwa & Anetta Barska & Janina Jedrzejczak-Gas & Marianna Sinicakova, 2020. "Industry 4.0 and Social Development in the Aspect of Sustainable Development: Relations in EC Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1068-1097.
    9. Palash Saha & Subrata Talapatra & H. M. Belal & Victoria Jackson, 2022. "Unleashing the Potential of the TQM and Industry 4.0 to Achieve Sustainability Performance in the Context of a Developing Country," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 495-513, December.
    10. Muhammad Altaf & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Abdul Hannan Qureshi, 2023. "Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of construction projects: sustainability perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12071-12118, November.
    11. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    14. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Michal Gluszak & Remigiusz Gawlik & Malgorzata Zieba, 2019. "Smart and Green Buildings Features in the Decision-Making Hierarchy of Office Space Tenants: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Prabhu Mannadhan & Jerzy Ryszard Szymański & Marta Zurek-Mortka & Mithileysh Sathiyanarayanan, 2024. "A Novel Framework for the Iraqi Manufacturing Industry Towards the Adoption of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Oscar F. Bustinza & Ferrán Vendrell-Herrero & Francisco J. Sánchez-Montesinos & José Antonio Campos-Granados, 2021. "Should Manufacturers Support the Entire Product Lifecycle with Services?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Luciana Aparecida Barbieri da Rosa & Clandia Maffini Gomes & Waleska Campos & Carolina Rodrigues & Tais Pentiado Godoy & Jordana Marques Kneipp, 2022. "Influencing Factors of The Innovation Power in the Adoption of Sustainability Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Judit OLÁH & Tamás HARMAN & József POPP, 2018. "Optimal Distribution Between Box And Pallet Automatic Warehouse Storage," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 199-210, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:4:p:124-:d:224410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.