IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v13y2020i1p189-211n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modern Trends of Customs Administrations Formation: Best European Practices and a Unified Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Shpak Nestor

    (National University “Lviv Polytechnic”,Ukraine.)

  • Melnyk Olga

    (National University “Lviv Polytechnic”,Ukraine.)

  • Adamiv Marta

    (National University “Lviv Polytechnic”,Ukraine.)

  • Sroka Włodzimierz

    (WSB University, Poland and North-West University,South Africa.)

Abstract

The ambiguous trends in international trade in 2019 and the forecast for 2020 enhance the functional role of the customs bodies in every country. That is because the customs system largely determines the ease of conducting international trade, the security of international supply chains and economic development of the countries. Though many developed countries have been able to form progressive customs systems, there are still countries that are in the process of reforming customs administrations and require a unified conceptual approach to build their customs systems. Given this fact the goal of our study is to analyze current trends in the development of the international customs systems and on the basis of it to identify the main and support functions of customs administration. Based on the principle of the best practices, the countries with the best customs administrations according to WTO data, i.e. France, Germany, the Netherlands, Lithuania and Poland were selected for analysis. We analyzed the positions of these countries in the leading international rankings, the key quantitative indicators of their customs activity and the peculiarities of the organizational construction of the customs authorities by functional principle. As the result, based on the use of systematic, dynamic and topologically substantive approaches and results of research, we developed a unified conceptual structure of the customs administration. In particular, the main functions (i.e. control, security and fiscal) and support functions (i.e. regulatory, administration, communication, service, information and statistical subsystems, resource support subsystem and international cooperation) were proposed. The proposed structure is intended to be used by representatives of the customs authorities in different countries throughout the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Shpak Nestor & Melnyk Olga & Adamiv Marta & Sroka Włodzimierz, 2020. "Modern Trends of Customs Administrations Formation: Best European Practices and a Unified Structure," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 189-211, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:189-211:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2020-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nispa-2020-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miklós Pakurár & Hossam Haddad & János Nagy & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2019. "The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Ishtiaq Ahmad & Judit Oláh & József Popp & Domicián Máté, 2018. "Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Ben Czapnik, 2015. "The Unique Features of the Trade Facilitation Agreement: A Revolutionary New Approach to Multilateral Negotiations or the Exception Which Proves the Rule?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 773-794.
    4. Ropret Marko & Aristovnik Aleksander & Kovač Polonca, 2018. "A Content Analysis of the Rule of Law within Public Governance Models: Old vs. New EU Member States," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 129-152, December.
    5. Judit Oláh & Zuzana Virglerova & József Popp & Jana Kliestikova & Sándor Kovács, 2019. "The Assessment of Non-Financial Risk Sources of SMES in the V4 Countries and Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Rutendo Tavengerwei, 2018. "Using Trade Facilitation to Assist MSMEs in E-Commerce in Developing Countries," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 349-378.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lubica Gajanova & Margareta Nadanyiova & George Lazaroiu, 2020. "Specifics in Brand Value Sources of Customers in the Banking Industry from the Psychographic Point of View," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 1-18.
    2. Pavol Durana & Pavol Kral & Vojtech Stehel & George Lazaroiu & Wlodzimierz Sroka, 2019. "Quality Culture of Manufacturing Enterprises: A Possible Way to Adaptation to Industry 4.0," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Faisal Mohammed O. Almaslukh & Haliyana Khalid & Alaa Mahdi Sahi, 2022. "The Impact of Internal Marketing Practices on Employees’ Job Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of the Saudi Arabian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Most. Nirufer Yesmin & Saiful Hoque & Md. Alamgir Hossain & Nusrat Jahan & Yuantao Fang & Renhong Wu & Md. Jahangir Alam, 2023. "SERVQUAL to Determine Relationship Quality and Behavioral Intentions: An SEM Approach in Retail Banking Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Jee-Won Kang & Young Namkung, 2022. "Measuring the Service Quality of Fresh Food Delivery Platforms: Development and Validation of the “Food PlatQual” Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. S. Ananda & Raghavendra Prasanna Kumar & Dharmendra Singh, 2023. "A mediation analysis of perceived service quality, customer satisfaction and customer engagement in the banking sector," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 570-584, September.
    8. Noor Aida Shazwani Abd Razak & Shariff Harun & Siti Norida Wahab, 2023. "A Theoretical Framework on Customer Satisfaction in an Automotive Lubricant Market," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 139-146.
    9. Judit Oláh & Zuzana Virglerova & József Popp & Jana Kliestikova & Sándor Kovács, 2019. "The Assessment of Non-Financial Risk Sources of SMES in the V4 Countries and Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Auriacombe Christelle & Meyer Natanya, 2020. "Realising South Africa's National Development Plan goals: The need for change to a collaborative democracy to facilitate community participation," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Ortal FALKOVITCH & Carmit Moshe ROZENTAL, 2019. "The Digitalization Of Banking In Israel And Its Effect On Customer Satisfaction. A Qualitative Study From The Perspective Of Managers At Two Israeli Banks," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 14, pages 143-154, December.
    12. Ben K. Mburu & Peter Koome & David Gichuhi, 2020. "Influence of employer-employee relationships on service quality in the hospitality industry in Nakuru County, Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 166-171, September.
    13. Nestor SHPAK & Ihor KULYNIAK & Maryana GVOZD & Olga PYROG & Wlodzimierz SROKA, 2021. "Shadow Economy And Its Impact On The Public Administration: Aspects Of Financial And Economic Security Of The Country'S Industry," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2021(36), pages 81-101, June.
    14. Ulziimaa Altnaa & Laszlo Vasa & Gyorgy Ivan Neszmelyi, 2021. "The Role of Network Ties on SMEs Internationalization Process in the Developing Countries/Emerging Markets: A Comparison between Mongolia, China, and Malaysia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 274-291.
    15. Piotr W. Saługa & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna & Radosław Miśkiewicz & Mateusz Chłąd, 2020. "Cost of Equity of Coal-Fired Power Generation Projects in Poland: Its Importance for the Management of Decision-Making Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-11, September.
    16. Agung Budi Prasetio & Burhanuddin bin Mohd Aboobaider & Asmala bin Ahmad, 2022. "Organizational Ambidexterity as an Outcome of Quality Dimensions and Triple Helix: The Role of Technology Readiness and User Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Neufeld, Nora, 2016. "Implementing the Trade Facilitation Agreement: From vision to reality," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2016-14, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    18. Ibrahim Adow Aden & Dr. Janet Muthimi, 2022. "Explicating the Impact of Customer Retention on Organizational Resilience: An Empirical Study of Selected Insurance Companies in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 582-592, October.
    19. Haris Alibašić & Christopher L. Atkinson, 2023. "Policy Transfer Framework in the Environmental Governance of Non-EU and EU Member Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Esraa Esam Alharasis & Hossam Haddad & Maha Shehadeh & Ahmad Saleem Tarawneh, 2022. "Abnormal Monitoring Costs Charged for Auditing Fair Value Model: Evidence from Jordanian Finance Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:189-211:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.