IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2969-d350194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the Psychosocial Safety Climate Reduce Ill-Health Presenteeism? Evidence from Chinese Healthcare Staff under a Dual Information Processing Path Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Beini Liu

    (School of Business, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Qiang Lu

    (School of E-Business and Logistics, Beijing Technology and Business University; Beijing 100048, China)

  • Yue Zhao

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business; Beijing 100070, China)

  • Jing Zhan

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business; Beijing 100070, China)

Abstract

Because of heavy workloads, non-transferable responsibilities, and shift systems, healthcare staff are prone to ill-health presenteeism. Based on social information processing theory, this study explored the influence of the psychosocial safety climate (PSC) on ill-health presenteeism. The mediating effects of perceived instrumental support and perceived emotional support and the moderating effect of organic structure in this process were observed. Using a time-lagged research design, data from 386 healthcare staff were gathered and multiple regression and bootstrapping were used to test each hypothesis. The results showed that: (1) PSC negatively relates to ill-health presenteeism. (2) Both perceived instrumental support and perceived emotional support mediate the relationship between PSC and ill-health presenteeism. The affective information processing path is more effective than the cognitive information processing path, but they do not convey a positive interaction effect on ill-health presenteeism. (3) The organic structure moderates the mediating effect of perceived emotional support but does not exert a significant moderating effect on the mediating process of perceived instrumental support. This study particularly identified PSC as a contextual antecedent of ill-health presenteeism. By combining organizational, work-related, and person-related factors, a more comprehensive theoretical framework for the understanding of ill-health presenteeism is developed, thus informing health promotion management.

Suggested Citation

  • Beini Liu & Qiang Lu & Yue Zhao & Jing Zhan, 2020. "Can the Psychosocial Safety Climate Reduce Ill-Health Presenteeism? Evidence from Chinese Healthcare Staff under a Dual Information Processing Path Lens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2969-:d:350194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Wei & Sun, Huiying & Woodcock, Simon & Anis, Aslam, 2015. "Illness related wage and productivity losses: Valuing ‘presenteeism’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 62-71.
    2. Samuel Aryee & Li-Yun Sun & Zhen Xiong George Chen & Yaw A. Debrah, 2008. "Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 4(3), pages 393-411, November.
    3. Tianan Yang & Yu-Ming Shen & Mingjing Zhu & Yuanling Liu & Jianwei Deng & Qian Chen & Lai-Chu See, 2015. "Effects of Co-Worker and Supervisor Support on Job Stress and Presenteeism in an Aging Workforce: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Johnson, Michael D. & Hollenbeck, John R. & Scott DeRue, D. & Barnes, Christopher M. & Jundt, Dustin, 2013. "Functional versus dysfunctional team change: Problem diagnosis and structural feedback for self-managed teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 1-11.
    5. Tianan Yang & Run Lei & Xuan Jin & Yan Li & Yangyang Sun & Jianwei Deng, 2019. "Supervisor Support, Coworker Support and Presenteeism among Healthcare Workers in China: The Mediating Role of Distributive Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-9, March.
    6. John Joseph & Ronald Klingebiel & Alex James Wilson, 2016. "Organizational Structure and Performance Feedback: Centralization, Aspirations, and Termination Decisions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1065-1083, October.
    7. Zhou, Qin & Martinez, Luis F. & Ferreira, Aristides I. & Rodrigues, Piedade, 2016. "Supervisor support, role ambiguity and productivity associated with presenteeism: A longitudinal study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3380-3387.
    8. Aryee, Samuel & Sun, Li-Yun & Chen, Zhen Xiong George & Debrah, Yaw A., 2008. "Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 393-411, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caitlin A. Ceryes & Jacqueline Agnew & Andrea L. Wirtz & Daniel J. Barnett & Roni A. Neff, 2023. "Exploring U.S. Food System Workers’ Intentions to Work While Ill during the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Sari Mansour & Malik Faisal Azeem & Maureen Dollard & Rachael Potter, 2022. "How Psychosocial Safety Climate Helped Alleviate Work Intensification Effects on Presenteeism during the COVID-19 Crisis? A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beini Liu & Qiang Lu, 2020. "Creating a Sustainable Workplace Environment: Influence of Workplace Safety Climate on Chinese Healthcare Employees’ Presenteeism from the Perspective of Affect and Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Tianan Yang & Hubin Shi & Yuangeng Guo & Xuan Jin & Yexin Liu & Yongchuang Gao & Jianwei Deng, 2019. "Effect of Work Environment on Presenteeism among Aging American Workers: The Moderated Mediating Effect of Sense of Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Wei-Li Wu & Yi-Chih Lee, 2020. "Do Work Engagement and Transformational Leadership Facilitate Knowledge Sharing? A Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Iftikhar Hussain & Shahab Ali & Farrukh Shahzad & Muhammad Irfan & Yong Wan & Zeeshan Fareed & Li Sun, 2022. "Abusive Supervision Impact on Employees’ Creativity: A Mediated-Moderated Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Yucheng Zhang & Zhenyu Liao, 2015. "Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 959-987, December.
    6. Kan Ouyang & Wing Lam & Weidong Wang, 2015. "Roles of gender and identification on abusive supervision and proactive behavior," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 671-691, September.
    7. Budhi Haryanto & Edi Cahyono, 2019. "Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Performance: The Role of Gender," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 305-311.
    8. Ifzal Ahmad & Khalida Begum, 2023. "Impact of abusive supervision on intention to leave: a moderated mediation model of organizational-based self esteem and emotional exhaustion," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 669-688, April.
    9. Xiao Yuan & Yaoshan Xu & Yongjuan Li, 2020. "Resource Depletion Perspective on the Link Between Abusive Supervision and Safety Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 213-228, February.
    10. De Clercq, Dirk & Haq, Inam Ul & Azeem, Muhammad Umer & Raja, Usman, 2018. "Family incivility, emotional exhaustion at work, and being a good soldier: The buffering roles of waypower and willpower," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 27-36.
    11. Yuhyung Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Seongho Kang, 2021. "Mistreatment from Multiple Sources: Interaction Effects of Abusive Supervision, Coworker Incivility, and Customer Incivility on Work Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Robin Snell & May Wong & Almaz Chak & Sandy Hui, 2013. "Representational predicaments at work: How they are experienced and why they may happen," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 251-279, March.
    13. Andrew Li & Chenwei Liao & Ping Shao & Jason Huang, 2022. "Angry but not Deviant: Employees’ Prior-Day Deviant Behavior Toward the Family Buffers Their Reactions to Abusive Supervisory Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 683-697, May.
    14. Jasim Mohammed Kareem, 2018. "Employee Silence an Outcome of Offensive Supervision: An investigation of Mediating Role of Justice Perception," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 11-15:4.
    15. Maie Stein & Sylvie Vincent-Höper & Marlies Schümann & Sabine Gregersen, 2020. "Beyond Mistreatment at the Relationship Level: Abusive Supervision and Illegitimate Tasks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Shahab Ali & Pu Yongjian & Farrukh Shahzad & Iftikhar Hussain & Dawei Zhang & Zeeshan Fareed & Filza Hameed & Chunlei Wang, 2022. "Abusive Supervision and Turnover Intentions: A Mediation-Moderation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Yucheng Zhang & Timothy C. Bednall, 2016. "Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 455-471, December.
    18. Qin Xu & Guangxi Zhang & Andrew Chan, 2019. "Abusive Supervision and Subordinate Proactive Behavior: Joint Moderating Roles of Organizational Identification and Positive Affectivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 829-843, July.
    19. Allan B. I. Bernardo & Mary Angeline A. Daganzo & Anna Carmella G. Ocampo, 2018. "Abusive Supervision and Well-Being of Filipino Migrant Workers in Macau: Consequences for Self-Esteem and Heritage Culture Detachment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 277-292, August.
    20. Guanxing Xiong & Huadong Huang & Yingyi Ma & Cuiqi Liang & Haixia Wang, 2021. "Abusive Supervision and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: The Mediating Role of Status Challenge and the Moderating Role of Leader–Member Exchange," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2969-:d:350194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.