IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4729-d378912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez

    (International Chair of Social Responsibility, Catholic University of Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain)

  • Emilio Abad-Segura

    (Department of Economics and Business, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña

    (Department of Economics and Business, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Valentín Molina-Moreno

    (Department of Management, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Responsible higher education institutions have an impact on society and economic, environmental, and social development. These effects define the axes of the socially responsible management of the universities. The concept of university social responsibility (USR) manages these relationships to produce a positive impact on society through higher education, research, and the transfer of knowledge and technology, as well as education for sustainability. For this study, worldwide research into this subject was studied for the period 1970–2019. A bibliometric analysis of 870 articles was made, obtaining results for the scientific productivity of the journals, authors, institutions, and countries contributing to this research. The main category is business, management, and accounting. The most productive journal is the Business and Society Review, while the California Management Review is the most cited. The authors with the most articles are Stavnezer, Luo, and Lanero. The most productive institution is Wuhan University. The United States is the country with the most publications and citations, and the same country, together with the United Kingdom, make the most international contributions. Evidence shows growing worldwide interest in the economic and environmental impacts of USR. Future research should focus on analysing the links between the responsible and sustainable consumption of universities and their short-term financial, economic, and sustainable impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez & Emilio Abad-Segura & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2020. "Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4729-:d:378912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Luis Vázquez & Carlota L. Aza & Ana Lanero, 2016. "University social responsibility as antecedent of students’ satisfaction," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 13(2), pages 137-149, July.
    2. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    3. Aleksandr Auzan, 2013. "University Mission: An Economist's Perspective," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 266-286.
    4. Farah Nabilah Maidin & Tengku Adil Tengku Izhar, 2018. "A Framework Based Knowledge Sharing Factor in Higher Institution," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(6), pages 846-861, June.
    5. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Di Costa, Flavia, 2019. "Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 51-57.
    6. Henry Etzkowitz & Chunyan Zhou, 2006. "Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 77-83, February.
    7. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    8. Khawaja Fawad Latif, 2018. "The Development and Validation of Stakeholder-Based Scale for Measuring University Social Responsibility (USR)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 511-547, November.
    9. Martin Gerner, 2019. "Assessing and managing sustainability in international perspective: corporate sustainability across cultures – towards a strategic framework implementation approach," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-34, December.
    10. ., 2017. "Corporate social responsibility," Chapters, in: Organizational Opportunity and Deviant Behavior, chapter 8, pages 135-158, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Shimelis G. Assefa & Abebe Rorissa, 2013. "A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co‐word analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(12), pages 2513-2536, December.
    12. Nelarine Cornelius & James Wallace & Rana Tassabehji, 2007. "An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Identity and Ethics Teaching in Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 117-135, November.
    13. Scott Jeffrey & Stuart Rosenberg & Brianna McCabe, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 395-408, October.
    14. Nickson Hebert Odongo & Daoping Wang, 2018. "Corporate responsibility, ethics and accountability," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 111-122, March.
    15. Shimelis G. Assefa & Abebe Rorissa, 2013. "A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(12), pages 2513-2536, December.
    16. Milton Friedman, 2007. "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits," Springer Books, in: Walther Ch Zimmerli & Markus Holzinger & Klaus Richter (ed.), Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, pages 173-178, Springer.
    17. Sara Moggi, 2019. "Social and environmental reports at universities: a Habermasian view on their evolution," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 283-326, July.
    18. Lennart Nørreklit & Lisa Jack & Hanne Nørreklit, 2019. "Moving towards digital governance of university scholars: instigating a post-truth university culture," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(4), pages 869-899, December.
    19. Issam Kouatli, 2018. "The contemporary definition of university social responsibility with quantifiable sustainability," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(7), pages 888-909, November.
    20. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    21. Zinette Bergman & Manfred Max Bergman & Kiran Fernandes & Daphne Grossrieder & Lea Schneider, 2018. "The Contribution of UNESCO Chairs toward Achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    22. Carson, Thomas L., 1993. "Does the Stakeholder Theory Constitute a New Kind of Theory of Social Responsibility?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 171-176, April.
    23. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    24. Emilio Abad-Segura & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña, 2019. "The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    25. Dafna M. DiSegni & Moshe Huly & Sagi Akron, 2015. "Corporate social responsibility, environmental leadership and financial performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 131-148, March.
    26. Sharyn McDonald, 2014. "Social responsibility clusters arising from social partnerships," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 331-347, May.
    27. Loet Leydesdorff, 2012. "The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(1), pages 25-35, March.
    28. Yue Wu & Kaifu Zhang & Jinhong Xie, 2020. "Bad Greenwashing, Good Greenwashing: Corporate Social Responsibility and Information Transparency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 3095-3112, July.
    29. Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Ortiz Jiménez & Adoración Sánchez Ayala & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2020. "The Impact of the University Classroom on Managing the Socio-Educational Well-being: A Global Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, February.
    30. Vivian Welch & Mark Petticrew & Jennifer Petkovic & David Moher & Elizabeth Waters & Howard White & Peter Tugwell & the PRISMA-Equity Bellagio group, 2016. "Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 287-324, June.
    31. Sahar Sepasi & Udo Braendle & Amir Hossein Rahdari, 2018. "Comprehensive sustainability reporting in higher education institutions," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 155-170, October.
    32. Hongbo Jiang & Qigan Shao & James J.H. Liou & Ting Shao & Xiaosheng Shi, 2019. "Improving the Sustainability of Open Government Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, April.
    33. Eun-Mi Lee & Hyun Jung Lee & Jae-Hyeon Pae & Seong-Yeon Park, 2016. "The important role of corporate social responsibility capabilities in improving sustainable competitive advantage," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 642-653, October.
    34. Yasuyuki Motoyama & Heike Mayer, 2017. "Revisiting the Roles of the University in Regional Economic Development: A Triangulation of Data," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 787-804, December.
    35. Phillips, Robert & Freeman, R. Edward & Wicks, Andrew C., 2003. "What Stakeholder Theory is Not," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 479-502, October.
    36. Maretno Agus Harjoto, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and degrees of operating and financial leverage," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 487-513, August.
    37. Ruth Bell & Matluba Khan & Maria Romeo-Velilla & Ingrid Stegeman & Alba Godfrey & Timothy Taylor & George Morris & Brigit Staatsen & Nina van der Vliet & Hanneke Kruize & Kirsti Sarheim Anthun & Monic, 2019. "Ten Lessons for Good Practice for the INHERIT Triple Win: Health, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    38. Fatima David & Rute Abreu & Francisco Carreira & Sidalina Goncalves, 2010. "Performance indicators and corporate social responsibility: evidence from Portuguese higher education institutions," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 251-274.
    39. Matthias Klumpp, 2018. "How to Achieve Supply Chain Sustainability Efficiently? Taming the Triple Bottom Line Split Business Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    40. Maretno Agus Harjoto, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate fraud," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 762-779, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirna Leko Šimić & Ekta Sharma & Željka Kadlec, 2022. "Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes toward University Social Responsibility: Comparison between India and Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Pedro Aceituno-Aceituno & Joaquín Danvila-del-Valle & Abel González García & Carlos Bousoño-Calzón, 2021. "Scientific Mobility, Training and Entrepreneurial Skills in Health Sciences: The Spanish Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Emotional Creativity in Art Education: An Exploratory Analysis and Research Trends," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Ali Karasan & Fatma Kutlu Gündoǧdu & Serhat Aydın, 2023. "Decision-making methodology by using multi-expert knowledge for uncertain environments: green metric assessment of universities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7393-7422, August.
    5. Ateeq ur Rehman Irshad & Nabeel Safdar & Zahid Irshad Younas & Wajiha Manzoor, 2023. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms’ Environmental Performance: Case Study of Environmental Sustainability-Based Business Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio Abad-Segura & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña, 2019. "The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Asif Saeed & Ammar Ali Gull & Asad Ali Rind & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2022. "Do socially responsible firms demand high‐quality audits? An international evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2235-2255, April.
    3. Rosane Maria Seibert & Clea Beatriz Macagnan & Robert Dixon, 2021. "Priority Stakeholders’ Perception: Social Responsibility Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Sara Rodriguez-Gomez & Maria Lourdes Arco-Castro & Maria Victoria Lopez-Perez & Lazaro Rodríguez-Ariza, 2020. "Where Does CSR Come from and Where Does It Go? A Review of the State of the Art," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Sybille Sachs & Marc Maurer, 2009. "Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 535-544, April.
    6. Muhamad Azrin Nazri & Nor Asiah Omar & Aini Aman & Abu Hanifah Ayob & Nur Ainna Ramli, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Performance in Takaful Agencies: The Moderating Role of Objective Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Tomina Saveanu & Daniel Badulescu & Sorana Saveanu & Maria-Madela Abrudan & Alina Badulescu, 2021. "The Role of Owner-Managers in Shaping CSR Activity of Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Deepa Sharma & Suman Chakraborty & Ashwath Ananda Rao & Lumen Shawn Lobo, 2023. "The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Bibliometric Overview," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    9. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    10. Franck Aggeri & Aurélien Acquier, 2005. "La théorie des stakeholders permet-elle de rendre compte des pratiques d'entreprise en matière de RSE ?," Post-Print halshs-00645708, HAL.
    11. Garanina, Tatiana & Kim, Oksana, 2023. "The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    12. Jonathan M. Karpoff, 2021. "On a stakeholder model of corporate governance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(2), pages 321-343, June.
    13. Mehrnaz Ashrafi & Gregory M. Magnan & Michelle Adams & Tony R. Walker, 2020. "Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Jung-Fa Tsai & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Ming-Hua Lin & Duy-Van Nguyen & Hsu-Hao Lin & Anh-Tuan Ngo, 2021. "Impacts of Environmental Certificate and Pollution Abatement Equipment on SMEs’ Performance: An Empirical Case in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Rind, Asad Ali & Abbassi, Wajih & Allaya, Manel & Hammouda, Amira, 2022. "Local peers and firm misconduct: The role of sustainability and competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Abdulhakeem Raji & Abeer Hassan, 2021. "Sustainability and Stakeholder Awareness: A Case Study of a Scottish University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Thorey S Thorisdottir & Lara Johannsdottir, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Influencing Sustainability within the Fashion Industry. A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-64, November.
    18. Bongani Munkuli & Renee Horne, 2018. "Financial Markets Value Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – A Study of the South African Mining Sector," Africagrowth Agenda, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 17-22.
    19. Márkus, Martin, 2023. "A társadalmi felelősségi pontszámok és a működési kockázat kapcsolata kockázati kategóriák szerint [The relationship between the ESG score and operational risk in different risk categories]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 746-771.
    20. Yves Fassin, 2012. "Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 83-96, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4729-:d:378912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.