IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i4p785-803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How CSR Affects Polish Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Izabela Jonek-Kowalska
  • Mariusz Zielinski

Abstract

Purpose: The article refers to the assessment of the activities of enterprises within CSR, according to the classification adopted in the Carroll’s pyramid model. Research on CSR issues in this approach has been conducted since the 1980s and is usually addressed to the top management. Design/Approach/Methodology: This article is based on research on the attitude to CSR activities of managers / employees at the operational level; in this way we endeavour to fill a certain cognitive gap. The research included a representative sample of large and medium-sized enterprises in Poland, including representativeness by economy sectors. Findings: The research results point to a different hierarchy of CSR domains than that suggested by the Carroll’s pyramid (and most of the results of previous research addressed to the top management). The highest rated by respondents was legal responsibility, before ethical, and only third place was taken by economic responsibility. Practical Implications: The research results could be useful for managers responsible for CSR impleneting and developing. Originality/Value: The article contributed to filling the cognitive gap regarding priorities declared by CSR managers, i.e. persons implementing CSR activities on behalf of enterprises in practice. The research results indicate that the respondent's job position (the scope of duties related to CSR) and the economic sector they represent have the greatest impact on the valuation of individual areas of CSR, while the size of the enterprise has a weak impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Mariusz Zielinski, 2020. "How CSR Affects Polish Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 785-803.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:785-803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1714/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul C. Godfrey & Nile W. Hatch, 2007. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 87-98, January.
    2. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    3. Gaughan, Patrick H. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar (Raj) G., 2018. "A framework for analyzing international business and legal ethical standards," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 813-822.
    4. Blair, Margaret M., 2015. "Of Corporations, Courts, Personhood, and Morality," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 415-431, October.
    5. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    7. Glavas, Ante & Kelley, Ken, 2014. "The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 165-202, April.
    8. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    9. Saridakis, Charalampos & Angelidou, Sofia & Woodside, Arch G., 2020. "What type of CSR engagement suits my firm best? Evidence from an abductively-derived typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 174-187.
    10. Maignan, Isabelle & Ferrell, O. C., 2001. "Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: an investigation of French businesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 37-51, January.
    11. Aminu Ahmadu Hamidu & Md Harashid Haron & Azlan Amran, 2016. "Exploring the Drivers and Nature of Corporate Social Responsibility Practice from an African Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 696-703.
    12. Nil Engizek & Bahar Yasin, 2017. "How CSR and overall service quality lead to affective commitment: mediating role of company reputation," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 111-125, March.
    13. Glen Whelan, 2013. "Corporate Constructed and Dissent Enabling Public Spheres: Differentiating Dissensual from Consensual Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 755-769, July.
    14. Schwartz, Mark S. & Carroll, Archie B., 2003. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 503-530, October.
    15. Madsen, Peter M. & Bingham, John B., 2014. "A Stakeholder–Human Capital Perspective on the Link between Social Performance and Executive Compensation," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 1-30, January.
    16. Najeb Masoud, 2017. "How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Denise Baden, 2016. "A reconstruction of Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility for the 21st century," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Seojin Stacey Lee & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2019. "Modified Pyramid of CSR for Corporate Image and Customer Loyalty: Focusing on the Moderating Role of the CSR Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Scott Jeffrey & Stuart Rosenberg & Brianna McCabe, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 395-408, October.
    20. Sigmund Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2018. "In search of ethics: from Carroll to integrative CSR economics," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 469-491, December.
    21. Tobias Gössling & Chris Vocht, 2007. "Social Role Conceptions and CSR Policy Success," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 363-372, September.
    22. Archie B. Carroll, 2016. "Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8, December.
    23. Aminu Ahmadu Hamidu & Md Harashid Haron & Azlan Amran, 2016. "Exploring the Drivers and Nature of Corporate Social Responsibility Practice from an African Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 696-703.
    24. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility, product market competition, and firm value," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 40-55.
    25. Pérez-Cornejo, Clara & de Quevedo-Puente, Esther & Delgado-García, Juan Bautista, 2019. "How to manage corporate reputation? The effect of enterprise risk management systems and audit committees on corporate reputation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 505-515.
    26. Mehrnaz Ashrafi & Gregory M. Magnan & Michelle Adams & Tony R. Walker, 2020. "Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jolanta Stec-Rusiecka & Agata Warminska, 2021. "The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Taking up Socially Responsible Actions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 788-798.
    2. Xiaojuan Wu & Patrycja Hąbek, 2021. "Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Case of Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariusz Zieliński & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2021. "Does CSR Affect the Profitability and Valuation of Energy Companies? An Example from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Najeb Masoud, 2017. "How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Yaeri Kim & Seojin Stacey Lee & Taewoo Roh, 2020. "Taking Another Look at Airline CSR: How Required CSR and Desired CSR Affect Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Mariusz Zieliński & Małgorzata Adamska, 2022. "ESG Assessment from the Perspective of the Management Board and Trade Unions on the Example of the Opole Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Bongani Munkuli & Renee Horne, 2018. "Financial Markets Value Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – A Study of the South African Mining Sector," Africagrowth Agenda, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 17-22.
    6. Stephen T. Homer & Koon Vui Yee & Kuan Siew Khor, 2023. "Developing a measurement instrument for perceived Corporate citizenship using multi-stakeholder, multi-industry and cross-country validations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 277-300, February.
    7. Ernesto D’Avanzo & Mariangela Franch & Elio Borgonovi, 2021. "Ethics and Sustainable Management. An Empirical Modelling of Carroll’s Pyramid for the Italian Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Imhanrenialena Benedict Ogbemudia & Ebhotemhen Wilson & Apreala Solomon Ebiladei & Chukwu Benjamin Ibe & Moguluwa Shedrach Chinwuba & Ilo Sylvester Okechukwu, 2022. "The Evolving Strategic CSR Practices in Africa: Exploring the Multidimensional Implications for Telecommunication Firms’ Outcomes in Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    9. Younis A. Battal Saleh, 2023. "Using the Concept of Precedence as an Approach to Explain the Logical Interaction and Interrelationships among Corporate Social Responsibilities: Battal 's CSR Train Vs. Carroll ′s CSR Pyramid," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 13(1), pages 27-78.
    10. Francisco González Santa Cruz & Iliana Loor Alcívar & Nelly Moreira Mero & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2020. "Analysis of the Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Study Applied to Co-operativism in Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 517-534, April.
    11. Anne Elizabeth Fordham & Guy M. Robinson, 2018. "Mapping meanings of corporate social responsibility – an Australian case study," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Hafiz Yasir Ali & Rizwan Qaiser Danish & Muhammad Asrar‐ul‐Haq, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility boosts firm financial performance: The mediating role of corporate image and customer satisfaction," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 166-177, January.
    13. Habtie Alemnew Belay & Fentaye Kasaa Hailu & Gedif Tessema Sinshaw, 2024. "Linking employees' work orientation and corporate social responsibility practices: Multilevel and multistakeholder cross‐sectional study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 676-696, January.
    14. Mallika Tamvada, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Jennifer Kunz & Stephanie May & Holger J. Schmidt, 2020. "Sustainable luxury: current status and perspectives for future research," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 541-601, July.
    16. Francesco Gangi & Mario Mustilli & Nicola Varrone & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Banks’ Financial Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 42-58, October.
    17. Anat Anaqie Zahidy & Shahryar Sorooshian & Zahidy Abd Hamid, 2019. "Critical Success Factors for Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption in the Construction Industry in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Teik Aun Wong & Mohammad Reevany Bustami, 2020. "A Case Study of Micro Businesses in Jelutong Wet Market in Penang, Malaysia: Implications for CSR Scholarship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 535-546, September.
    19. Aminu Ahmadu Hamidu & Md. Harashid Haron & Azlan Amran, 2017. "Incorporating Stakeholder Engagement, Financial Implications and Values in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Proposed Model from an African Context," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 247-253.
    20. Montserrat Boronat-Navarro & José Antonio Pérez-Aranda, 2019. "Consumers’ perceived corporate social responsibility evaluation and support: The moderating role of consumer information," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(4), pages 613-638, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Carroll’s pyramid model; economic responsibility; legal responsibility; ethical responsibility; discretionary/philanthropic responsibility; CSR managers.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • L29 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:785-803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.