IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i6p2934-d1104721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fault Diagnosis of Nuclear Power Plant Based on Sparrow Search Algorithm Optimized CNN-LSTM Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Chunyuan Zhang

    (School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China
    Research Center for Digital Nuclear Reactor Engineering and Technology of Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China)

  • Pengyu Chen

    (School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China
    Research Center for Digital Nuclear Reactor Engineering and Technology of Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China)

  • Fangling Jiang

    (College of Computer Science, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China)

  • Jinsen Xie

    (School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China
    Research Center for Digital Nuclear Reactor Engineering and Technology of Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China)

  • Tao Yu

    (School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China
    Research Center for Digital Nuclear Reactor Engineering and Technology of Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China)

Abstract

Nuclear power is a type of clean and green energy; however, there is a risk of radioactive material leakage when accidents occur. When radioactive material leaks from nuclear power plants, it has a great impact on the environment and personnel safety. In order to enhance the safety of nuclear power plants and support the operator’s decisions under accidental circumstances, this paper proposes a fault diagnosis method for nuclear power plants based on the sparrow search algorithm (SSA) optimized by the CNN-LSTM network. Firstly, the convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to extract features from the data before they were then combined with the long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to process time series data and form a CNN-LSTM model. Some of the parameters in the LSTM neural network need to be manually tuned based on experience, and the settings of these parameters have a great impact on the overall model results. Therefore, this paper selected the sparrow search algorithm with a strong search capability and fast convergence to automatically search for the hand-tuned parameters in the CNN-LSTM model, and finally obtain the SSA-CNN-LSTM model. This model can classify the types of accidents that occur in nuclear power plants to reduce the nuclear safety hazards caused by human error. The experimental data are from a personal computer transient analyzer (PCTRAN). The results show that the classification accuracy of the SSA-CNN-LSTM model for the nuclear power plant fault classification problem is as high as 98.24%, which is 4.80% and 3.14% higher compared with the LSTM neural network and CNN-LSTM model, respectively. The superiority of the sparrow search algorithm for optimizing model parameters and the feasibility and accuracy of the SSA-CNN-LSTM model for nuclear power plant fault diagnosis were verified.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunyuan Zhang & Pengyu Chen & Fangling Jiang & Jinsen Xie & Tao Yu, 2023. "Fault Diagnosis of Nuclear Power Plant Based on Sparrow Search Algorithm Optimized CNN-LSTM Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2934-:d:1104721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2934/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2934/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Shuhao & Zhu, Shenglong & Ma, Yan & Mao, Demei, 2015. "A variable step size firefly algorithm for numerical optimization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 214-220.
    2. Rocco S., Claudio M. & Zio, Enrico, 2007. "A support vector machine integrated system for the classification of operation anomalies in nuclear components and systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(5), pages 593-600.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingyu Xiao & Ben Qi & Jingang Liang & Jiejuan Tong & Qing Deng & Peng Chen, 2023. "Enhancing LOCA Breach Size Diagnosis with Fundamental Deep Learning Models and Optimized Dataset Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Min Zhang & Zhao Xu & Guichang Zhang & Binbin Wang & Bin Zhang & Yilong Liu, 2024. "Review on the Application of Living PSA in Nuclear Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quintanilha, Igor M. & Elias, Vitor R.M. & da Silva, Felipe B. & Fonini, Pedro A.M. & da Silva, Eduardo A.B. & Netto, Sergio L. & Apolinário, José A. & de Campos, Marcello L.R. & Martins, Wallace A., 2021. "A fault detector/classifier for closed-ring power generators using machine learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Ota, Shuhei & Kimura, Mitsuhiro, 2017. "A statistical dependent failure detection method for n-component parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 376-382.
    3. Krzysztof Gaska & Agnieszka Generowicz & Anna Gronba-Chyła & Józef Ciuła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Paweł Kwaśnicki & Marcin Mala & Krzysztof Chyła, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence Methods for Analysis and Optimization of CHP Cogeneration Units Based on Landfill Biogas as a Progress in Improving Energy Efficiency and Limiting Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Chiwoo Park & Jianhua Z. Huang & Yu Ding, 2010. "A Computable Plug-In Estimator of Minimum Volume Sets for Novelty Detection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1469-1480, October.
    5. Wen, Zhixun & Pei, Haiqing & Liu, Hai & Yue, Zhufeng, 2016. "A Sequential Kriging reliability analysis method with characteristics of adaptive sampling regions and parallelizability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 170-179.
    6. Yang, Chunzhen & Liu, Jingquan & Zeng, Yuyun & Xie, Guangyao, 2019. "Real-time condition monitoring and fault detection of components based on machine-learning reconstruction model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 433-441.
    7. Zhang, Xinwei & Feng, Yong & Chen, Jinglong & Liu, Zijun & Wang, Jun & Huang, Hong, 2024. "Knowledge distillation-optimized two-stage anomaly detection for liquid rocket engine with missing multimodal data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. B. Koti Reddy & Amit Kumar Singh, 2021. "Optimal Operation of a Photovoltaic Integrated Captive Cogeneration Plant with a Utility Grid Using Optimization and Machine Learning Prediction Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.
    9. Mousavi, Yashar & Alfi, Alireza, 2018. "Fractional calculus-based firefly algorithm applied to parameter estimation of chaotic systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 202-215.
    10. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis & Guney, Yilmaz & Rocco, Claudio M., 2019. "A reliability model for assessing corporate governance using machine learning techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 220-231.
    11. Zhang, Liangwei & Lin, Jing & Karim, Ramin, 2015. "An angle-based subspace anomaly detection approach to high-dimensional data: With an application to industrial fault detection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 482-497.
    12. Yang, Jaemin & Kim, Jonghyun, 2020. "Accident diagnosis algorithm with untrained accident identification during power-increasing operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Baraldi, Piero & Castellano, Andrea & Shokry, Ahmed & Gentile, Ugo & Serio, Luigi & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "A Feature Selection-based Approach for the Identification of Critical Components in Complex Technical Infrastructures: Application to the CERN Large Hadron Collider," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Liu, Jingsen & Mao, Yinan & Liu, Xiaozhen & Li, Yu, 2020. "A dynamic adaptive firefly algorithm with globally orientation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 76-101.
    15. Guikema, Seth D., 2009. "Natural disaster risk analysis for critical infrastructure systems: An approach based on statistical learning theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 855-860.
    16. Shen, Xingkeng & Feng, Kaixuan & Xu, Heming & Wang, Guangqiang & Zhang, Yishang & Dai, Ying & Yun, Wanying, 2023. "Reliability analysis of bending fatigue life of hydraulic pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Wang, Jingyuan & Liu, Zhen & Wang, Jiahong & Long, Bing & Zhou, Xiuyun, 2022. "A general enhancement method for test strategy generation for the sequential fault diagnosis of complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Abubaker Younis & Fatima Belabbes & Petru Adrian Cotfas & Daniel Tudor Cotfas, 2024. "Utilizing the Honeybees Mating-Inspired Firefly Algorithm to Extract Parameters of the Wind Speed Weibull Model," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Fink, Olga & Zio, Enrico & Weidmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 198-206.
    20. Moghaddass, Ramin & Sheng, Shuangwen, 2019. "An anomaly detection framework for dynamic systems using a Bayesian hierarchical framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 561-582.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2934-:d:1104721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.