IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i15p5749-d1208443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Comparison of Hydrogen Refueling with Directly Pressurized vs. Cascade Method

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Genovese

    (Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy)

  • David Blekhman

    (Department of Technology, Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA
    Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA)

  • Michael Dray

    (Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA)

  • Francesco Piraino

    (Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy)

  • Petronilla Fragiacomo

    (Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of two hydrogen station configurations during the refueling process: the conventional “directly pressurized refueling process” and the innovative “cascade refueling process.” The objective of the cascade process is to refuel vehicles without the need for booster compressors. The experiments were conducted at the Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility located at California State University, Los Angeles. In the cascade refueling process, the facility buffer tanks were utilized as high-pressure storage, enabling the refueling operation. Three different scenarios were tested: one involving the cascade refueling process and two involving compressor-driven refueling processes. On average, each refueling event delivered 1.6 kg of hydrogen. Although the cascade refueling process using the high-pressure buffer tanks did not achieve the pressure target, it resulted in a notable improvement in the nozzle outlet temperature trend, reducing it by approximately 8 °C. Moreover, the overall hydrogen chiller load for the two directly pressurized refuelings was 66 Wh/kg and 62 Wh/kg, respectively, whereas the cascading process only required 55 Wh/kg. This represents a 20% and 12% reduction in energy consumption compared to the scenarios involving booster compressors during fueling. The observed refueling range of 150–350 bar showed that the cascade process consistently required 12–20% less energy for hydrogen chilling. Additionally, the nozzle outlet temperature demonstrated an approximate 8 °C improvement within this pressure range. These findings indicate that further improvements can be expected in the high-pressure region, specifically above 350 bar. This research suggests the potential for significant improvements in the high-pressure range, emphasizing the viability of the cascade refueling process as a promising alternative to the direct compression approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Genovese & David Blekhman & Michael Dray & Francesco Piraino & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Experimental Comparison of Hydrogen Refueling with Directly Pressurized vs. Cascade Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5749-:d:1208443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ludvik Viktorsson & Jukka Taneli Heinonen & Jon Bjorn Skulason & Runar Unnthorsson, 2017. "A Step towards the Hydrogen Economy—A Life Cycle Cost Analysis of A Hydrogen Refueling Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Dorota Burchart-Korol & Magdalena Gazda-Grzywacz & Katarzyna Zarębska, 2020. "Research and Prospects for the Development of Alternative Fuels in the Transport Sector in Poland: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Ji-Qiang Li & No-Seuk Myoung & Jeong-Tae Kwon & Seon-Jun Jang & Taeckhong Lee, 2020. "A Study on the Prediction of the Temperature and Mass of Hydrogen Gas inside a Tank during Fast Filling Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Markus Reuß & Paris Dimos & Aline Léon & Thomas Grube & Martin Robinius & Detlef Stolten, 2021. "Hydrogen Road Transport Analysis in the Energy System: A Case Study for Germany through 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Remzi Can Samsun & Michael Rex & Laurent Antoni & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Deployment of Fuel Cell Vehicles and Hydrogen Refueling Station Infrastructure: A Global Overview and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-34, July.
    6. Matteo Genovese & Viviana Cigolotti & Elio Jannelli & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Hydrogen Refueling Process: Theory, Modeling, and In-Force Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    7. Soyeong Park & Solji Nam & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2020. "Preference Structure on the Design of Hydrogen Refueling Stations to Activate Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Shunichi Hienuki & Yoshie Hirayama & Tadahiro Shibutani & Junji Sakamoto & Jo Nakayama & Atsumi Miyake, 2019. "How Knowledge about or Experience with Hydrogen Fueling Stations Improves Their Public Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Kosmas A. Kavadias & Vasileios Kosmas & Stefanos Tzelepis, 2022. "Sizing, Optimization, and Financial Analysis of a Green Hydrogen Refueling Station in Remote Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Kevin Kendall, 2022. "Green Hydrogen in the UK: Progress and Prospects," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Gregory Trencher & Achmed Edianto, 2021. "Drivers and Barriers to the Adoption of Fuel Cell Passenger Vehicles and Buses in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Jinsheng Xiao & Shuo Ma & Xu Wang & Shanshan Deng & Tianqi Yang & Pierre Bénard, 2019. "Effect of Hydrogen Refueling Parameters on Final State of Charge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arkadiusz Małek & Agnieszka Dudziak & Jacek Caban & Monika Stoma, 2024. "Strategic Model for Yellow Hydrogen Production Using the Metalog Family of Probability Distributions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José A. Ventura, 2023. "Climate Benefits Advocated by the Development of Sustainable Vehicles and Charging Infrastructures in the Transport Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-5, April.
    2. Son, Woojin & Lee, Seungyeon & Woo, JongRoul, 2023. "Community acceptance of hydrogen power plant projects: The case of South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Arturo Vallejos-Romero & Minerva Cordoves-Sánchez & César Cisternas & Felipe Sáez-Ardura & Ignacio Rodríguez & Antonio Aledo & Álex Boso & Jordi Prades & Boris Álvarez, 2022. "Green Hydrogen and Social Sciences: Issues, Problems, and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Ushnik Mukherjee & Azadeh Maroufmashat & Apurva Narayan & Ali Elkamel & Michael Fowler, 2017. "A Stochastic Programming Approach for the Planning and Operation of a Power to Gas Energy Hub with Multiple Energy Recovery Pathways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Tubagus Aryandi Gunawan & Alessandro Singlitico & Paul Blount & James Burchill & James G. Carton & Rory F. D. Monaghan, 2020. "At What Cost Can Renewable Hydrogen Offset Fossil Fuel Use in Ireland’s Gas Network?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Linda Hancock & Linda Wollersheim, 2021. "EU Carbon Diplomacy: Assessing Hydrogen Security and Policy Impact in Australia and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Homes of the future: Unpacking public perceptions to power the domestic hydrogen transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Francesco Calise, 2022. "Recent Advances in Green Hydrogen Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-4, August.
    9. Haugen, Molly J. & Paoli, Leonardo & Cullen, Jonathan & Cebon, David & Boies, Adam M., 2021. "A fork in the road: Which energy pathway offers the greatest energy efficiency and CO2 reduction potential for low-carbon vehicles?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Justyna Cader & Renata Koneczna & Piotr Olczak, 2021. "The Impact of Economic, Energy, and Environmental Factors on the Development of the Hydrogen Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Sforzini, Matteo & de Santoli, Livio, 2022. "Technical, economic and environmental issues related to electrolysers capacity targets according to the Italian Hydrogen Strategy: A critical analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Sustainability of China’s New Energy Vehicle Development: Fresh Evidence from Population Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    13. José Manuel Andújar & Francisca Segura & Jesús Rey & Francisco José Vivas, 2022. "Batteries and Hydrogen Storage: Technical Analysis and Commercial Revision to Select the Best Option," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-32, August.
    14. Alessandra Perna & Mariagiovanna Minutillo & Simona Di Micco & Elio Jannelli, 2022. "Design and Costs Analysis of Hydrogen Refuelling Stations Based on Different Hydrogen Sources and Plant Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Ko, Sungmin & Shin, Jungwoo, 2023. "Projection of fuel cell electric vehicle demand reflecting the feedback effects between market conditions and market share affected by spatial factors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Piotr F. Borowski, 2022. "Management of Energy Enterprises in Zero-Emission Conditions: Bamboo as an Innovative Biomass for the Production of Green Energy by Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Meixia Pan & Wanming Chen & Shengyuan Wang & Xiaolan Wu, 2022. "The Influence of Low Carbon Emission Engine on the Life Cycle of Automotive Products: A Case Study of Three-Cylinder Models in the Chinese Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Chenggang Wang, 2022. "Green Technology Innovation, Energy Consumption Structure and Sustainable Improvement of Enterprise Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Li, Da & Zhang, Zhaosheng & Zhou, Litao & Liu, Peng & Wang, Zhenpo & Deng, Junjun, 2022. "Multi-time-step and multi-parameter prediction for real-world proton exchange membrane fuel cell vehicles (PEMFCVs) toward fault prognosis and energy consumption prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    20. Tomasz Jałowiec & Dariusz Grala & Piotr Maśloch & Henryk Wojtaszek & Grzegorz Maśloch & Agnieszka Wójcik-Czerniawska, 2022. "Analysis of the Implementation of Functional Hydrogen Assumptions in Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5749-:d:1208443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.