IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v283y2021ics0306261920316810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fork in the road: Which energy pathway offers the greatest energy efficiency and CO2 reduction potential for low-carbon vehicles?

Author

Listed:
  • Haugen, Molly J.
  • Paoli, Leonardo
  • Cullen, Jonathan
  • Cebon, David
  • Boies, Adam M.

Abstract

A future energy system for road transport requires optimised energy use and primary energy decarbonisation to achieve global CO2 reduction goals. Simultaneously decarbonising transport with other sectors of the economy places additional demands on limited low-carbon energy sources, requiring efficient processes within a fuel pathway from energy source to -energy use. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and fuel-cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) are low-carbon options that reduce tailpipe emissions, but differ in overall efficiency, associated carbon intensity, and cost. Current commercialised technologies, as well as theoretical maximums, are aggregated in a stochastic analysis to quantify the energy efficiency and CO2 differences for BEV and FCEV energy systems. Carbon capture and storage improves source-to-wheels CO2 intensity for hydrogen produced from steam methane reformation (27 gCO2/km with carbon capture and store and 140 gCO2/km without for light-duty FCEVs). Light-duty BEVs have a lower CO2 intensity (11 gCO2/km) using decarbonised grid electricity and are 65% more efficient than light-duty FCEVs using grid energy. These effects translate to heavy-good vehicles but with added complexity. In a maximised trailer volume scenario, electric and fuel-cell heavy-good vehicles have similar projected carbon intensities from a natural gas primary energy source, but electric heavy-good vehicle using conventional battery systems or an electric road system are able to achieve a 55% and 67% carbon reduction (gCO2/m3 km) compared to fuel-cell heavy-goods vehicles, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Haugen, Molly J. & Paoli, Leonardo & Cullen, Jonathan & Cebon, David & Boies, Adam M., 2021. "A fork in the road: Which energy pathway offers the greatest energy efficiency and CO2 reduction potential for low-carbon vehicles?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:283:y:2021:i:c:s0306261920316810
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920316810
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. International Energy Agency & International Renewable Energy Agency & United Nations Statistics Division & World Bank & World Health Organization, "undated". "Tracking SDG 7 [Seguimiento del ODS 7]," World Bank Publications - Reports 31752, The World Bank Group.
    2. Gunther Glenk & Stefan Reichelstein, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 347-347, April.
    3. Patil, V. & Shastry, V. & Himabindu, M. & Ravikrishna, R.V., 2016. "Life-cycle analysis of energy and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive fuels in India: Part 2 – Well-to-wheels analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 699-712.
    4. Mari Svensson, Ann & Møller-Holst, Steffen & Glöckner, Ronny & Maurstad, Ola, 2007. "Well-to-wheel study of passenger vehicles in the Norwegian energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 437-445.
    5. Ludvik Viktorsson & Jukka Taneli Heinonen & Jon Bjorn Skulason & Runar Unnthorsson, 2017. "A Step towards the Hydrogen Economy—A Life Cycle Cost Analysis of A Hydrogen Refueling Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Ito, Yutaka & Managi, Shunsuke, 2015. "The potential of alternative fuel vehicles: A cost-benefit analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 39-50.
    7. Wang, Dawei & Zamel, Nada & Jiao, Kui & Zhou, Yibo & Yu, Shuhai & Du, Qing & Yin, Yan, 2013. "Life cycle analysis of internal combustion engine, electric and fuel cell vehicles for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 402-412.
    8. Gunther Glenk & Stefan Reichelstein, 2019. "Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 216-222, March.
    9. Bishop, Justin D.K. & Molden, N. & Boies, Adam M, 2019. "Using portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) to derive more accurate estimates of fuel use and nitrogen oxides emissions from modern Euro 6 passenger cars under real-world driving conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 942-973.
    10. Hwang, Jenn-Jiang, 2013. "Sustainability study of hydrogen pathways for fuel cell vehicle applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 220-229.
    11. Palmer, Kate & Tate, James E. & Wadud, Zia & Nellthorp, John, 2018. "Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 108-119.
    12. Thiel, Christian & Perujo, Adolfo & Mercier, Arnaud, 2010. "Cost and CO2 aspects of future vehicle options in Europe under new energy policy scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7142-7151, November.
    13. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Kaying & Acha, Salvador & Sunny, Nixon & Shah, Nilay, 2022. "Strategic transport fleet analysis of heavy goods vehicle technology for net-zero targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Xu, Yue & Wang, Qingsong & Tian, Shu & Liu, Mengyue & Zhang, Yujie & Yuan, Xueliang & Ma, Qiao & Liu, Chengqing, 2024. "How to promote CO2 reduction in urban households from a micro perspective?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Paddeu, Daniela & Parkhurst, Graham & Rosenberg, Ges & Carhart, Neil & Taylor, Colin, 2024. "Promoting sustainable urban freight through stakeholder engagement to co-create decarbonisation pathways in the UK," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Diskin, David & Kuhr, Yonah & Ben-Hamo, Ido Yohai & Spatari, Sabrina & Tartakovsky, Leonid, 2023. "Environmental benefits of combined electro-thermo-chemical technology over battery-electric powertrains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    5. Samanta, Samiran & Roy, Dibyendu & Roy, Sumit & Smallbone, Andrew & Roskilly, Anthony Paul, 2023. "Techno-economic analysis of a fuel-cell driven integrated energy hub for decarbonising transportation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Mundaca, Luis & Román-Collado, Rocío & Cansino, José M., 2022. "Assessing the impacts of social norms on low-carbon mobility options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Klaus Lieutenant & Ana Vassileva Borissova & Mohamad Mustafa & Nick McCarthy & Ioan Iordache, 2022. "Comparison of “Zero Emission” Vehicles with Petrol and Hybrid Cars in Terms of Total CO 2 Release—A Case Study for Romania, Poland, Norway and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Groppi, Daniele & Feijoo, Felipe & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Astiaso Garcia, Davide & de Santoli, Livio, 2024. "Optimal decarbonisation pathways for the Italian energy system: Modelling a long-term energy transition to achieve zero emission by 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tubagus Aryandi Gunawan & Alessandro Singlitico & Paul Blount & James Burchill & James G. Carton & Rory F. D. Monaghan, 2020. "At What Cost Can Renewable Hydrogen Offset Fossil Fuel Use in Ireland’s Gas Network?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Zheng, Yi & You, Shi & Bindner, Henrik W. & Münster, Marie, 2022. "Optimal day-ahead dispatch of an alkaline electrolyser system concerning thermal–electric properties and state-transitional dynamics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    3. Klaus Lieutenant & Ana Vassileva Borissova & Mohamad Mustafa & Nick McCarthy & Ioan Iordache, 2022. "Comparison of “Zero Emission” Vehicles with Petrol and Hybrid Cars in Terms of Total CO 2 Release—A Case Study for Romania, Poland, Norway and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Roberto F. Aguilera & Julian Inchauspe, 2022. "An overview of hydrogen prospects: Economic, technical and policy considerations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(1), pages 164-186, January.
    5. Abadie, Luis Mª & Chamorro, José M., 2023. "Investment in wind-based hydrogen production under economic and physical uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    6. Jafri, Yawer & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Mesfun, Sennai & Rådberg, Henrik & Mossberg, Johanna & Hulteberg, Christian & Furusjö, Erik, 2020. "Combining expansion in pulp capacity with production of sustainable biofuels – Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emissions assessment of drop-in fuels from black liquor part-streams," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Nybø, Astrid, 2020. "Transitioning remote Arctic settlements to renewable energy systems – A modelling study of Longyearbyen, Svalbard," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    9. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Xu, Chuanbo & Wu, Yunna & Dai, Shuyu, 2020. "What are the critical barriers to the development of hydrogen refueling stations in China? A modified fuzzy DEMATEL approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Shen, Xiaojun & Li, Xingyi & Yuan, Jiahai & Jin, Yu, 2022. "A hydrogen-based zero-carbon microgrid demonstration in renewable-rich remote areas: System design and economic feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    12. Yang, Zijun & Wang, Bowen & Jiao, Kui, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of fuel cell, electric and internal combustion engine vehicles under different fuel scenarios and driving mileages in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Speckmann, Friedrich-W. & Keiner, Dominik & Birke, Kai Peter, 2020. "Influence of rectifiers on the techno-economic performance of alkaline electrolysis in a smart grid environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 107-116.
    14. Pan, Guangsheng & Gu, Wei & Chen, Sheng & Lu, Yuping & Zhou, Suyang & Wei, Zhinong, 2021. "Investment equilibrium of an integrated multi–stakeholder electricity–gas–hydrogen system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Lucas Bretschger & Karen Pittel, 2020. "Twenty Key Challenges in Environmental and Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 725-750, December.
    16. Rosa, Lorenzo & Mazzotti, Marco, 2022. "Potential for hydrogen production from sustainable biomass with carbon capture and storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2021. "LCOE: A Useful and Valid Indicator—Replica to James Loewen and Adam Szymanski," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-8, January.
    18. Lüth, Alexandra & Seifert, Paul E. & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Weibezahn, Jens, 2023. "How to connect energy islands: Trade-offs between hydrogen and electricity infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    19. Nyangon, Joseph & Darekar, Ayesha, 2024. "Advancements in hydrogen energy systems: A review of levelized costs, financial incentives and technological innovations," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    20. Chang, Ching-Chih & Huang, Po-Chien & Tu, Jhih-Sheng, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of yard tractors using hydrogen fuel at the Port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:283:y:2021:i:c:s0306261920316810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.