IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2022i1p100-d1010910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined Biological Method for Simultaneous Removal of Hydrogen Sulphide and Volatile Methylsiloxanes from Biogas

Author

Listed:
  • Kazimierz Gaj

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Klaudia Cichuta

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) and volatile methylsiloxanes (VMSs) are key pollutants from the point of view of the operators of biogas plants. H 2 S poses corrosive hazards, while VMSs transform into difficult-to-remove deposits, reducing the availability and yield of biogas combustion equipment. This study provides a critical overview and evaluation (so-called SWOT analysis) of implemented and promising methods to reduce the content of the above pollutants in biogas, with particular emphasis on biological techniques. The aim of the analyses was to develop an innovative concept for a hybrid biological method for the combined removal of H 2 S and VMSs using the same device, i.e., a two-phase biotrickling filter (BTF), in which the organic phase that intensifies the mass transfer of VMSs is in the form of a low-viscosity methyl silicone oil. The finally developed technological schematic diagram includes the basic devices and media streams. The concept is characterized by closed media circuits and comprehensively solves the problem of purifying biogas from sewage sludge. In conclusion, key issues requiring further research are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazimierz Gaj & Klaudia Cichuta, 2022. "Combined Biological Method for Simultaneous Removal of Hydrogen Sulphide and Volatile Methylsiloxanes from Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:100-:d:1010910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kazimierz Gaj, 2020. "Adsorptive Biogas Purification from Siloxanes—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Shen, Yanwen & Linville, Jessica L. & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem & Schoene, Robin P. & Snyder, Seth W., 2015. "Producing pipeline-quality biomethane via anaerobic digestion of sludge amended with corn stover biochar with in-situ CO2 removal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 300-309.
    3. Läntelä, J. & Rasi, S. & Lehtinen, J. & Rintala, J., 2012. "Landfill gas upgrading with pilot-scale water scrubber: Performance assessment with absorption water recycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 307-314.
    4. Zhang, Yuyao & Kawasaki, Yu & Oshita, Kazuyuki & Takaoka, Masaki & Minami, Daisuke & Inoue, Go & Tanaka, Toshihiro, 2021. "Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 119-130.
    5. Santos-Clotas, Eric & Cabrera-Codony, Alba & Martín, Maria J., 2020. "Coupling adsorption with biotechnologies for siloxane abatement from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 314-323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lv, Siqi & Zhang, Rui & He, Yuanping & Ma, Zichuan & Ma, Xiaolong, 2024. "Efficient reactive adsorption of hexamethyldisiloxane on MCM-41 supported sulfuric acid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Hou, Xifeng & Zheng, Yanhui & Lv, Siqi & Ma, Zichuan & Ma, Xiaolong, 2022. "Effective removal of hexamethyldisiloxane using a citric acid modified three-dimensional graphene aerogel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 62-70.
    3. Zheng, Yanhui & Hou, Xifeng & Liu, Yuheng & Ma, Zichuan, 2021. "Hexamethyldisiloxane removal from biogas using reduced graphene-oxide aerogels as adsorbents," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 153-161.
    4. Mulu, Elshaday & M'Arimi, Milton M. & Ramkat, Rose C., 2021. "A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    7. Zhou, Yixuan & Su, Xianbo & Zhao, Weizhong & Wang, Lufei & Fu, Haijiao, 2023. "Enhanced coal biomethanation by microbial electrolysis and graphene in the anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    8. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Kapoor, Rimika & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Shah, Goldy & Sahota, Shivali & Singh, Dhruv & Verma, Mahesh, 2017. "Factors affecting methane loss from a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1379-1388.
    10. Abbas, Yasir & Yun, Sining & Wang, Ziqi & Zhang, Yongwei & Zhang, Xianmei & Wang, Kaijun, 2021. "Recent advances in bio-based carbon materials for anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Zhang, Yuyao & Kawasaki, Yu & Oshita, Kazuyuki & Takaoka, Masaki & Minami, Daisuke & Inoue, Go & Tanaka, Toshihiro, 2021. "Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 119-130.
    12. Chen, Miao & Liu, Shujun & Yuan, Xufeng & Li, Qing X. & Wang, Fengzhong & Xin, Fengjiao & Wen, Boting, 2021. "Methane production and characteristics of the microbial community in the co-digestion of potato pulp waste and dairy manure amended with biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 357-367.
    13. Rotunno, Paolo & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Energy and economic analysis of a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 417-432.
    14. Agnieszka Kasprzycka & Jan Kuna, 2018. "Methodical Aspects of Biogas Production in Small-Volume Bioreactors in Laboratory Investigations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, May.
    15. Feng, Qunjie & Lin, Yunqin, 2017. "Integrated processes of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for higher bioenergy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1272-1287.
    16. Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.
    17. Salman, Chaudhary Awais & Schwede, Sebastian & Thorin, Eva & Yan, Jinyue, 2017. "Enhancing biomethane production by integrating pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1074-1083.
    18. Collins, B.A. & Birzer, C.H. & Harris, P.W. & Kidd, S.P. & McCabe, B.K. & Medwell, P.R., 2023. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion in leach bed reactors coupled to anaerobic filters: A review and the potential of biochar filters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Edyta Słupek & Patrycja Makoś & Jacek Gębicki, 2020. "Theoretical and Economic Evaluation of Low-Cost Deep Eutectic Solvents for Effective Biogas Upgrading to Bio-Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Rasi, S. & Seppälä, M. & Rintala, J., 2013. "Organic silicon compounds in biogases produced from grass silage, grass and maize in laboratory batch assays," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 137-142.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:100-:d:1010910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.