IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v229y2018icp1269-1283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Chunyan
  • Xie, Yujiao
  • Ji, Xiaoyan
  • Liu, Chang
  • Lu, Xiaohua

Abstract

Biogas has been considered as an alternative renewable energy, and raw biogas needs to be upgraded in order to be used as vehicle fuels or injected into the natural gas grid. In this work, the conceptual process for biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride (ChCl)/urea (1:2 on a molar basis) was developed, simulated and evaluated based on the commercialized software Aspen Plus. Reliable thermophysical properties and phase equilibria are prerequisite for carrying out process simulation. In order to carry out the process simulation, the thermophysical properties of ChCl/Urea (1:2) and its aqueous solutions as well as the phase equilibria of gas-ChCl/Urea (1:2), ChCl/Urea (1:2)-H2O and gas-ChCl/Urea (1:2)-H2O were surveyed and evaluated. After evaluation, the consistent experimental data of these thermophysical properties were fitted to the models embedded in Aspen Plus. The properties needed but without available experimental results were predicted theoretically. The Non-Random Two-Liquid model and the Redlich-Kwong equation (NRTL-RK) model were used to describe the phase equilibria. The equilibrium approach was used for process simulation. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the reasonable operating parameters. With a set of reasonable operating conditions, the effects of ChCl/Urea (1:2) content on the total energy utilization, the diameters and pressure drops of absorber and desorber as well as the environmental assessment of the process were studied. The simulation results showed that, with the addition of ChCl/Urea (1:2), the total energy utilization decreased by 16% compared to the process with pure water, and the diameters of both absorber and desorber decreased with increasing content of ChCl/Urea (1:2). The process using aqueous ChCl/Urea (1:2) was more environmentally benign than that with pure water. Therefore, aqueous ChCl/Urea (1:2) is a promising solvent for biogas upgrading.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:1269-1283
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917302738
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patterson, Tim & Esteves, Sandra & Dinsdale, Richard & Guwy, Alan, 2011. "An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1806-1816, March.
    2. Bacsik, Zoltán & Cheung, Ocean & Vasiliev, Petr & Hedin, Niklas, 2016. "Selective separation of CO2 and CH4 for biogas upgrading on zeolite NaKA and SAPO-56," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 613-621.
    3. Xie, Yujiao & Zhang, Yingying & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation using imidazolium-based ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 325-335.
    4. Yan, Cheng & Zhu, Liandong & Wang, Yanxin, 2016. "Photosynthetic CO2 uptake by microalgae for biogas upgrading and simultaneously biogas slurry decontamination by using of microalgae photobioreactor under various light wavelengths, light intensities,," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 9-18.
    5. Lynnette A. Blanchard & Dan Hancu & Eric J. Beckman & Joan F. Brennecke, 1999. "Green processing using ionic liquids and CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6731), pages 28-29, May.
    6. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation from gas mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 237-243.
    7. Sun, Qie & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinying & Liu, Longcheng & Yu, Zhixin & Yu, Xinhai, 2015. "Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 521-532.
    8. Läntelä, J. & Rasi, S. & Lehtinen, J. & Rintala, J., 2012. "Landfill gas upgrading with pilot-scale water scrubber: Performance assessment with absorption water recycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 307-314.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. N.Borhani, Tohid & Wang, Meihong, 2019. "Role of solvents in CO2 capture processes: The review of selection and design methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Chen, Yifeng & Sun, Yunhao & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "CO2 separation using a hybrid choline-2-pyrrolidine-carboxylic acid/polyethylene glycol/water absorbent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Sun, Jiasi & Sato, Yuki & Sakai, Yuka & Kansha, Yasuki, 2023. "Ternary deep eutectic solvents: Evaluations based on how their physical properties affect energy consumption during post-combustion CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Qadeer, Kinza & Valentina, Valentina & Khan, Amin & Yasin, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & De Guido, Giorgia & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2020. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane: Assessment of 3P's–Production, processing, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Chunyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 437-447.
    2. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Cheng, Jun & Wang, Yali & Liu, Niu & Hou, Wen & Zhou, Junhu, 2020. "Enhanced CO2 selectivity of mixed matrix membranes with carbonized Zn/Co zeolitic imidazolate frameworks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    4. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    5. Mulu, Elshaday & M'Arimi, Milton M. & Ramkat, Rose C., 2021. "A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Xie, Yujiao & Björkmalm, Johanna & Ma, Chunyan & Willquist, Karin & Yngvesson, Johan & Wallberg, Ola & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading using ionic liquids in comparison with industrially used technology in Scandinavian anaerobic digestion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 742-750.
    8. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Li, Shuangjun & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhao, Ruikai & Yuan, Xiangzhou, 2021. "Thermodynamic carbon pump 2.0: Elucidating energy efficiency through the thermodynamic cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    10. Ardolino, F. & Cardamone, G.F. & Parrillo, F. & Arena, U., 2021. "Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Xu, Ming-Xin & Wu, Hai-Bo & Wu, Ya-Chang & Wang, Han-Xiao & Ouyang, Hao-Dong & Lu, Qiang, 2021. "Design and evaluation of a novel system for the flue gas compression and purification from the oxy-fuel combustion process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Yan, Cheng & Zhu, Liandong & Wang, Yanxin, 2016. "Photosynthetic CO2 uptake by microalgae for biogas upgrading and simultaneously biogas slurry decontamination by using of microalgae photobioreactor under various light wavelengths, light intensities,," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 9-18.
    13. Kadam, Rahul & Panwar, N.L., 2017. "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 892-903.
    14. Loh, S.K. & Nasrin, A.B. & Mohamad Azri, S. & Nurul Adela, B. & Muzzammil, N. & Daryl Jay, T. & Stasha Eleanor, R.A. & Lim, W.S. & Choo, Y.M. & Kaltschmitt, M., 2017. "First Report on Malaysia’s experiences and development in biogas capture and utilization from palm oil mill effluent under the Economic Transformation Programme: Current and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1257-1274.
    15. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Choline-based deep eutectic solvents for CO2 separation: Review and thermodynamic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 436-455.
    16. Wantz, Eliot & Lemonnier, Mathis & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2023. "Innovative high-pressure water scrubber for biogas upgrading at farm-scale using vacuum for water regeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    17. Gao, Shida & Bo, Cuimei & Li, Jun & Niu, Chao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization and dynamic control of biogas pressurized water scrubbing process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2335-2344.
    18. Zenon Ziobrowski & Adam Rotkegel, 2021. "Feasibility study of CO2/N2 separation intensification on supported ionic liquid membranes by commonly used impregnation methods," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 297-312, April.
    19. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Frigo, S. & Desideri, U. & Pasini, G., 2018. "Small scale bio-LNG plant: Comparison of different biogas upgrading techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 328-335.
    20. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Xie, Yujiao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2016. "Screening of conventional ionic liquids for carbon dioxide capture and separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1160-1170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:1269-1283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.