IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v145y2021ics1364032121003695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas

Author

Listed:
  • Mulu, Elshaday
  • M'Arimi, Milton M.
  • Ramkat, Rose C.

Abstract

The main contaminants in biogas namely carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and siloxanes limit its application especially in engines by reducing energy density and causing corrosion on machine parts. Furthermore, the carbon dioxide in biogas contributes highly to global warming. Therefore, biogas should be upgraded to increase its safe application. Most commercial methods of biogas cleaning are expensive for small and medium scale digesters. There is no review documentation detailing the usage of natural materials in the purification of biogas. The aim of the current study was to systematically and critically review recent developments in the applications of natural materials in the purification and upgrade of biogas. Documented literature indicate that the low-cost natural adsorbents have potential in purification of biogas. The adsorption capacity of biogas contaminants for most materials can be enhanced by physical and chemical activation. The two mechanisms through which these material eliminate carbon dioxide in biogas namely surface adsorption and wet carbonation process have been discussed. In addition, the study looked at the factors that affect the removal of carbon dioxide from biogas using natural materials. The adsorption capacity of biogas contaminants for different natural and modified materials were reviewed. Furthermore, a summary of the merits and demerits of different natural adsorbents for biogas purification is presented. Future studies should investigate the methane loss during upgrading process using low-cost adsorbents. Comparative investigations of the process cost-effectiveness of using natural materials to upgrade biogas should be carried out to determine their suitability against the commercial processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mulu, Elshaday & M'Arimi, Milton M. & Ramkat, Rose C., 2021. "A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:145:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121003695
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121003695
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tajima, Hideo & Yamasaki, Akihiro & Kiyono, Fumio, 2004. "Energy consumption estimation for greenhouse gas separation processes by clathrate hydrate formation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1713-1729.
    2. Glaeser, Edward L. & Kahn, Matthew E., 2010. "The greenness of cities: Carbon dioxide emissions and urban development," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 404-418, May.
    3. Rasi, S. & Veijanen, A. & Rintala, J., 2007. "Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1375-1380.
    4. Chen, Xuejing & Jiang, Jianguo & Li, Kaimin & Tian, Sicong & Yan, Feng, 2017. "Energy-efficient biogas reforming process to produce syngas: The enhanced methane conversion by O2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 687-697.
    5. Stolecka, Katarzyna & Rusin, Andrzej, 2021. "Potential hazards posed by biogas plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Cha, Kyounghoon & Lim, Songtak & Hur, Tak, 2008. "Eco-efficiency approach for global warming in the context of Kyoto Mechanism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 274-280, September.
    7. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    8. Wang, Peng & Guo, Yafei & Zhao, Chuanwen & Yan, Junjie & Lu, Ping, 2017. "Biomass derived wood ash with amine modification for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 34-44.
    9. Tippayawong, N. & Thanompongchart, P., 2010. "Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4531-4535.
    10. Pizzuti, L. & Martins, C.A. & Lacava, P.T., 2016. "Laminar burning velocity and flammability limits in biogas: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 856-865.
    11. Rashidi, Nor Adilla & Yusup, Suzana & Hameed, Bassim H., 2013. "Kinetic studies on carbon dioxide capture using lignocellulosic based activated carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 440-446.
    12. Scholz, Marco & Melin, Thomas & Wessling, Matthias, 2013. "Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 199-212.
    13. Kadam, Rahul & Panwar, N.L., 2017. "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 892-903.
    14. Bacsik, Zoltán & Cheung, Ocean & Vasiliev, Petr & Hedin, Niklas, 2016. "Selective separation of CO2 and CH4 for biogas upgrading on zeolite NaKA and SAPO-56," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 613-621.
    15. Panwar, N.L. & Kaushik, S.C. & Kothari, Surendra, 2011. "Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1513-1524, April.
    16. Pellegrini, Laura Annamaria & De Guido, Giorgia & Langé, Stefano, 2018. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane via cryogenic upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-83.
    17. Sun, Qie & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinying & Liu, Longcheng & Yu, Zhixin & Yu, Xinhai, 2015. "Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 521-532.
    18. Läntelä, J. & Rasi, S. & Lehtinen, J. & Rintala, J., 2012. "Landfill gas upgrading with pilot-scale water scrubber: Performance assessment with absorption water recycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 307-314.
    19. Zhang, Yuyao & Kawasaki, Yu & Oshita, Kazuyuki & Takaoka, Masaki & Minami, Daisuke & Inoue, Go & Tanaka, Toshihiro, 2021. "Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 119-130.
    20. Lucia, Umberto, 2014. "Overview on fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 164-169.
    21. Wee, Jung-Ho, 2013. "A review on carbon dioxide capture and storage technology using coal fly ash," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 143-151.
    22. Vakulchuk, Roman & Overland, Indra & Scholten, Daniel, 2020. "Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    23. Montanari, Tania & Finocchio, Elisabetta & Salvatore, Enrico & Garuti, Gilberto & Giordano, Andrea & Pistarino, Chiara & Busca, Guido, 2011. "CO2 separation and landfill biogas upgrading: A comparison of 4A and 13X zeolite adsorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 314-319.
    24. Hao, Wenming & Björkman, Eva & Lilliestråle, Malte & Hedin, Niklas, 2013. "Activated carbons prepared from hydrothermally carbonized waste biomass used as adsorbents for CO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 526-532.
    25. Wassie, Yibeltal T. & Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2019. "Potential environmental impacts of small-scale renewable energy technologies in East Africa: A systematic review of the evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 377-391.
    26. Guo, Yafei & Zhao, Chuanwen & Chen, Xiaoping & Li, Changhai, 2015. "CO2 capture and sorbent regeneration performances of some wood ash materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 26-36.
    27. Guo, Mingxin & Song, Weiping & Buhain, Jeremy, 2015. "Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 712-725.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morgane Poser & Luis Rodolfo Duarte E. Silva & Pascal Peu & Éric Dumont & Annabelle Couvert, 2022. "A Two-Stage Biogas Desulfurization Process Using Cellular Concrete Filtration and an Anoxic Biotrickling Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Meng, Fanzhi & Meng, Yuan & Ju, Tongyao & Han, Siyu & Lin, Li & Jiang, Jianguo, 2022. "Research progress of aqueous amine solution for CO2 capture: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Papurello, Davide & Silvestri, Silvia & Biasioli, Franco & Lombardi, Lidia, 2022. "Wood ash biomethane upgrading system: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 702-712.
    4. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Dynamic analysis and investigation of the thermal transient effects in a CSTR reactor producing biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    5. Marcin Zieliński & Aleksandra Karczmarczyk & Marta Kisielewska & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Possibilities of Biogas Upgrading on a Bio-Waste Sorbent Derived from Anaerobic Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Tavera-Ruiz, C. & Martí-Herrero, J. & Mendieta, O. & Jaimes-Estévez, J. & Gauthier-Maradei, P. & Azimov, U. & Escalante, H. & Castro, L., 2023. "Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Chipo Shonhiwa & Yolanda Mapantsela & Golden Makaka & Patrick Mukumba & Ngwarai Shambira, 2023. "Biogas Valorisation to Biomethane for Commercialisation in South Africa: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Wang, Chao & Feng, Dong & Xia, Ao & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xianqing & Zhu, Xun & Liao, Qiang & Murphy, Jerry D., 2024. "A comparative life cycle assessment of electro-anaerobic digestion to evaluate biomethane generation from organic solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Qadeer, Kinza & Valentina, Valentina & Khan, Amin & Yasin, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & De Guido, Giorgia & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2020. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane: Assessment of 3P's–Production, processing, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Hosseinipour, Sayed Amir & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Comparison of the biogas upgrading methods as a transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 641-655.
    4. Lombardi, Lidia & Carnevale, Ennio, 2013. "Economic evaluations of an innovative biogas upgrading method with CO2 storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 88-94.
    5. Muhamed Rasit Atelge & Halil Senol & Mohammed Djaafri & Tulin Avci Hansu & David Krisa & Abdulaziz Atabani & Cigdem Eskicioglu & Hamdi Muratçobanoğlu & Sebahattin Unalan & Slimane Kalloum & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-39, October.
    6. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    7. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.
    11. Sun, Qie & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinying & Liu, Longcheng & Yu, Zhixin & Yu, Xinhai, 2015. "Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 521-532.
    12. Ramos-Suárez, J.L. & Ritter, A. & Mata González, J. & Camacho Pérez, A., 2019. "Biogas from animal manure: A sustainable energy opportunity in the Canary Islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 137-150.
    13. Gong, Huijuan & Zhou, Shuyu & Chen, Zezhi & Chen, Lu, 2019. "Effect of volatile organic compounds on carbon dioxide adsorption performance via pressure swing adsorption for landfill gas upgrading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 811-818.
    14. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    15. Kadam, Rahul & Panwar, N.L., 2017. "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 892-903.
    16. Gong, Huijuan & Chen, Zezhi & Yu, Huiqiang & Wu, Weili & Wang, Weixing & Pang, Honglei & Du, Mengfan, 2018. "Methane recovery in a combined amine absorption and gas steam boiler as a self-provided system for biogas upgrading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 744-751.
    17. Zhao, Chuanwen & Guo, Yafei & Yan, Junjie & Sun, Jian & Li, Weiling & Lu, Ping, 2019. "Enhanced CO2 sorption capacity of amine-tethered fly ash residues derived from co-firing of coal and biomass blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 453-461.
    18. Moioli, Emanuele & Schildhauer, Tilman, 2022. "Negative CO2 emissions from flexible biofuel synthesis: Concepts, potentials, technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Wantz, Eliot & Lemonnier, Mathis & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2023. "Innovative high-pressure water scrubber for biogas upgrading at farm-scale using vacuum for water regeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    20. Brigagão, George Victor & Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda & Pinto, Juliana Leite & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Upstream and downstream processing of microalgal biogas: Emissions, energy and economic performances under carbon taxation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 508-520.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:145:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121003695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.