IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v208y2017icp1379-1388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting methane loss from a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading system

Author

Listed:
  • Kapoor, Rimika
  • Subbarao, P.M.V.
  • Vijay, Virendra Kumar
  • Shah, Goldy
  • Sahota, Shivali
  • Singh, Dhruv
  • Verma, Mahesh

Abstract

Biogas upgrading is a vital step to produce high quality fuel called biomethane with above 90% methane (CH4). Among the various technologies available for biomethane production, water scrubbing is the most extensively implemented technology around the world. However, during the process of biogas upgrading, a some amount of CH4 is separated as CH4 loss through the water flowing out of the water scrubbing column. In this paper, various factors affecting CH4 loss from water scrubbing method are analysed. Some factors such as pressure, water flow rate and CH4 concentration in input gas are dependent upon the solubility and partial pressures of the gases are generally known. Apart from these factors CH4 losses due to bubble entrainment due to high pressure difference between water scrubbing column and desorption tank and gas short circuiting of the gas through the bottom section of the column due to no water sealing and water level maintencence also contribute to CH4 losses. Therefore, CH4 losses during the water scrubbing process due to these factors have been experimentally studied in this paper. A pilot scale water scrubbing system for biogas upgradation was used for the study. It was observed that CH4 % (v/v) in the upgraded biogas and CH4 loss % from the desorbed gas increased with the increase in pressure and increase in the concentration of CH4 in the input gas. Increase in water flow rates caused removal of larger quantities of water containing more absorbed CH4 and CO2 from the scrubbing column, thereby increasing CH4 loss of the system. Highest CH4 loss % of 9.9% (±0.1%), was obtained with raw biogas sample when water was desorbed at atmospheric pressures in the desorption tank, i.e. when pressure difference between the water scrubbing column and desorption tank was highest. A pressure vessel was installed in between scrubbing column and desorption tank to reduce the pressure difference for water leaving the column by varying the pressure in the pressure vessel from 1 to 9bar. With the increase in pressure in the pressure vessel, the pressure difference for water decreased which led to a saving in overall CH4 loss of the system. Water sealing and water level maintenance in the bottom section of the column also affected CH4 losses of the system. All the factors discussed in the article contribute to the CH4 losses from the scrubbing column and cannot be solely credited to a single factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Kapoor, Rimika & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Shah, Goldy & Sahota, Shivali & Singh, Dhruv & Verma, Mahesh, 2017. "Factors affecting methane loss from a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1379-1388.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:208:y:2017:i:c:p:1379-1388
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917312990
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kadam, Rahul & Panwar, N.L., 2017. "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 892-903.
    2. Chandra, R. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Khura, T.K., 2011. "Performance evaluation of a constant speed IC engine on CNG, methane enriched biogas and biogas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3969-3977.
    3. Chandra, R. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Khura, T.K., 2012. "Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-159.
    4. Läntelä, J. & Rasi, S. & Lehtinen, J. & Rintala, J., 2012. "Landfill gas upgrading with pilot-scale water scrubber: Performance assessment with absorption water recycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 307-314.
    5. Collet, Pierre & Flottes, Eglantine & Favre, Alain & Raynal, Ludovic & Pierre, Hélène & Capela, Sandra & Peregrina, Carlos, 2017. "Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 282-295.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moioli, Emanuele & Schildhauer, Tilman, 2022. "Negative CO2 emissions from flexible biofuel synthesis: Concepts, potentials, technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Hosseinipour, Sayed Amir & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Comparison of the biogas upgrading methods as a transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 641-655.
    3. Kadam, Rahul & Panwar, N.L., 2017. "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 892-903.
    4. Mulu, Elshaday & M'Arimi, Milton M. & Ramkat, Rose C., 2021. "A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Gupta, Aditi & Kumar, Ashwani & Sharma, Satyawati & Vijay, V.K., 2013. "Comparative evaluation of raw and detoxified mahua seed cake for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1514-1521.
    6. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    7. Barik, Debabrata & Murugan, S., 2014. "Investigation on combustion performance and emission characteristics of a DI (direct injection) diesel engine fueled with biogas–diesel in dual fuel mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 760-771.
    8. Abdullah Ebrahem Ebrahemi & Mohamed Abdallah Bassiony & Thaer Mahmoud Ibrahim Syam & Samer Ahmed, 2020. "Investigating the effect of the air inlet temperature on the combustion characteristics of a spark ignition engine fueled by biogas," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(4), pages 771-782, August.
    9. Yang, Liangcheng & Ge, Xumeng & Wan, Caixia & Yu, Fei & Li, Yebo, 2014. "Progress and perspectives in converting biogas to transportation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1133-1152.
    10. Subramanian, K.A. & Mathad, Vinaya C. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V., 2013. "Comparative evaluation of emission and fuel economy of an automotive spark ignition vehicle fuelled with methane enriched biogas and CNG using chassis dynamometer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 17-29.
    11. Hijazi, O. & Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Amer, B.M.A. & Amer, M.A. & Badr, M. & Bernhardt, H., 2020. "Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 417-424.
    12. Martinez, E. & Marcos, A. & Al-Kassir, A. & Jaramillo, M.A. & Mohamad, A.A., 2012. "Mathematical model of a laboratory-scale plant for slaughterhouse effluents biodigestion for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 210-219.
    13. Sadiq Y, Ragadia & Iyer, Rajesh C., 2020. "Experimental investigations on the influence of compression ratio and piston crown geometry on the performance of biogas fuelled small spark ignition engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 997-1009.
    14. Jung, Choongsoo & Park, Jungsoo & Song, Soonho, 2015. "Performance and NOx emissions of a biogas-fueled turbocharged internal combustion engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 186-195.
    15. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    16. Jacopo Bacenetti, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy from Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-5, July.
    17. Gaballah, Eid S. & Abdelkader, Tarek Kh & Luo, Shuai & Yuan, Qiaoxia & El-Fatah Abomohra, Abd, 2020. "Enhancement of biogas production by integrated solar heating system: A pilot study using tubular digester," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Ingrao, Carlo & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Adamczyk, Janusz & Ferrante, Valentina & Messineo, Antonio & Huisingh, Donald, 2019. "Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems: A comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 296-307.
    19. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    20. Wenyan Chen & Qiang Cai & Yuan Zhao & Guojuan Zheng & Yuting Liang, 2014. "Toxicity Evaluation of Pig Slurry Using Luminescent Bacteria and Zebrafish," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Biogas upgrading; Water scrubbing; CH4 loss;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:208:y:2017:i:c:p:1379-1388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.