IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3379-d378986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical and Economic Evaluation of Low-Cost Deep Eutectic Solvents for Effective Biogas Upgrading to Bio-Methane

Author

Listed:
  • Edyta Słupek

    (Department of Process Engineering and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza St. 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Patrycja Makoś

    (Department of Process Engineering and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza St. 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Jacek Gębicki

    (Department of Process Engineering and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza St. 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland)

Abstract

This paper presents the theoretical screening of 23 low-cost deep eutectic solvents (DESs) as absorbents for effective removal of the main impurities from biogas streams using a conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS). Based on thermodynamic parameters, i.e., the activity coefficient, excess enthalpy, and Henry’s constant, two DESs composed of choline chloride: urea in a 1:2 molar ratio (ChCl:U 1:2), and choline chloride: oxalic acid in a 1:2 molar ratio (ChCl:OA 1:2) were selected as the most effective absorbents. The σ-profile and σ-potential were used in order to explain the mechanism of the absorptive removal of CO 2 , H 2 S, and siloxanes from a biogas stream. In addition, an economic analysis was prepared to demonstrate the competitiveness of new DESs in the sorbents market. The unit cost of 1 m 3 of pure bio-methane was estimated to be in the range of 0.35–0.37 EUR, which is comparable to currently used technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Edyta Słupek & Patrycja Makoś & Jacek Gębicki, 2020. "Theoretical and Economic Evaluation of Low-Cost Deep Eutectic Solvents for Effective Biogas Upgrading to Bio-Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3379-:d:378986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3379/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3379/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Xie, Yujiao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2 separation from biogas with conventional ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 75-87.
    2. Rasi, S. & Veijanen, A. & Rintala, J., 2007. "Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1375-1380.
    3. Xie, Yujiao & Björkmalm, Johanna & Ma, Chunyan & Willquist, Karin & Yngvesson, Johan & Wallberg, Ola & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading using ionic liquids in comparison with industrially used technology in Scandinavian anaerobic digestion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 742-750.
    4. Santos-Clotas, Eric & Cabrera-Codony, Alba & Martín, Maria J., 2020. "Coupling adsorption with biotechnologies for siloxane abatement from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 314-323.
    5. Gao, Jubao & Cao, Lingdi & Dong, Haifeng & Zhang, Xiangping & Zhang, Suojiang, 2015. "Ionic liquids tailored amine aqueous solution for pre-combustion CO2 capture: Role of imidazolium-based ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 771-780.
    6. Ma, Chunyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 437-447.
    7. Xie, Yujiao & Zhang, Yingying & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation using imidazolium-based ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 325-335.
    8. Hosseinipour, Sayed Amir & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Comparison of the biogas upgrading methods as a transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 641-655.
    9. Edyta Słupek & Patrycja Makoś, 2020. "Absorptive Desulfurization of Model Biogas Stream Using Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Thomas Quaid & M. Toufiq Reza, 2021. "Carbon Capture from Biogas by Deep Eutectic Solvents: A COSMO Study to Evaluate the Effect of Impurities on Solubility and Selectivity," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tooba Qureshi & Majeda Khraisheh & Fares Almomani, 2023. "Cost and Heat Integration Analysis for CO 2 Removal Using Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid-ASPEN PLUS Modelling Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Zhang, Yuyao & Kawasaki, Yu & Oshita, Kazuyuki & Takaoka, Masaki & Minami, Daisuke & Inoue, Go & Tanaka, Toshihiro, 2021. "Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 119-130.
    3. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Wang, Honglin & Ma, Chunyan & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Improving high-pressure water scrubbing through process integration and solvent selection for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    6. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Ye, Nannan & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2021. "CO2 capture using ionic liquid-based hybrid solvents from experiment to process evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    7. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Choline-based deep eutectic solvents for CO2 separation: Review and thermodynamic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 436-455.
    8. Muhamed Rasit Atelge & Halil Senol & Mohammed Djaafri & Tulin Avci Hansu & David Krisa & Abdulaziz Atabani & Cigdem Eskicioglu & Hamdi Muratçobanoğlu & Sebahattin Unalan & Slimane Kalloum & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-39, October.
    9. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Xie, Yujiao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2 separation from biogas with conventional ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 75-87.
    10. Ibrahim, Muna Hassan & Hayyan, Maan & Hashim, Mohd Ali & Hayyan, Adeeb, 2017. "The role of ionic liquids in desulfurization of fuels: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1534-1549.
    11. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Moreno, Jovita & Iribarren, Diego, 2023. "Economic optimization and comparative environmental assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    12. Scholz, Marco & Melin, Thomas & Wessling, Matthias, 2013. "Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 199-212.
    13. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Zuzana Kapsdorferová & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko & Lisa Holden, 2024. "Perspectives of Electricity Production from Biogas in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Song, Xueyi & Yuan, Junjie & Yang, Chen & Deng, Gaofeng & Wang, Zhichao & Gao, Jubao, 2023. "Carbon dioxide separation performance evaluation of amine-based versus choline-based deep eutectic solvents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Krzysztof Gaska & Agnieszka Generowicz & Anna Gronba-Chyła & Józef Ciuła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Paweł Kwaśnicki & Marcin Mala & Krzysztof Chyła, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence Methods for Analysis and Optimization of CHP Cogeneration Units Based on Landfill Biogas as a Progress in Improving Energy Efficiency and Limiting Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Yankun Sun & Wanzhen Liu & Xinzhong Wang & Haiyan Yang & Jun Liu, 2020. "Enhanced Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide from Simulated Biogas on PEI/MEA-Functionalized Silica," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Bihong, Lv & Kexuan, Yang & Xiaobin, Zhou & Zuoming, Zhou & Guohua, Jing, 2020. "2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol based non-aqueous absorbent for energy-efficient and non-corrosive carbon dioxide capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    19. Bharathiraja, B. & Chakravarthy, M. & Ranjith Kumar, R. & Yogendran, D. & Yuvaraj, D. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Praveen Kumar, R. & Palani, S., 2015. "Aquatic biomass (algae) as a future feed stock for bio-refineries: A review on cultivation, processing and products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 634-653.
    20. Mulka, Rafał & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Szlachta, Józef & Mulka, Mariusz, 2016. "Estimation of methane production for batch technology – A new approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 440-449.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3379-:d:378986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.