IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5080-d421327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergetic, Economic and Exergo-Environmental Analysis of Bottoming Power Cycles Operating with CO 2 -Based Binary Mixture

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Haroon

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Abubakr Ayub

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universita Degli Studi Di Brescia, via Branze 38, 25121 Brescia, Italy)

  • Rasikh Tariq

    (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Av. Industrias No Contaminantes por Anillo Periferico Norte, Apdo., Postal 150 Merida, Mérida 97310, Yucatan, Mexico)

  • Farooq Sher

    (School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Environmental and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK)

  • Aklilu Tesfamichael Baheta

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Imran

    (School of Mechanical, Biomedical and Design Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)

Abstract

This study focused on investigating the bottoming power cycles operating with CO 2 -based binary mixture, taking into account exergetic, economic and exergo-environmental impact indices. The main intent is to assess the benefits of employing a CO 2 -based mixture working fluid in closed Brayton bottoming power cycles in comparison with pure CO 2 working fluid. Firstly, selection criteria for the choice of suitable additive compound for CO 2 -based binary mixture is delineated and the composition of the binary mixture is decided based on required cycle minimum temperature. The decided CO 2 -C 7 H 8 binary mixture with a 0.9 mole fraction of CO 2 is analyzed in two cycle configurations: Simple regenerative cycle (SRC) and Partial heating cycle (PHC). Comparative analysis among two configurations with selected working fluid are carried out. Thermodynamic analyses at varying cycle pressure ratio shows that cycle with CO 2 -C 7 H 8 mixture shows maximum power output and exergy efficiency at rather higher cycle pressure ratio compared to pure CO 2 power cycles. PHC with CO 2 -C 7 H 8 mixture shows 28.68% increment in exergy efficiency with the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) 21.62% higher than pure CO 2 PHC. Whereas, SRC with CO 2 -C 7 H 8 mixture shows 25.17% increment in exergy efficiency with LCOE 57.14% higher than pure CO 2 SRC. Besides showing lower economic value, cycles with a CO 2 -C 7 H 8 mixture saves larger CO 2 emissions and also shows greater exergo-environmental impact improvement and plant sustainability index.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Haroon & Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh & Abubakr Ayub & Rasikh Tariq & Farooq Sher & Aklilu Tesfamichael Baheta & Muhammad Imran, 2020. "Exergetic, Economic and Exergo-Environmental Analysis of Bottoming Power Cycles Operating with CO 2 -Based Binary Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5080-:d:421327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5080/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5080/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    2. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    3. Kim, Min Seok & Ahn, Yoonhan & Kim, Beomjoo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2016. "Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 893-909.
    4. Costante M. Invernizzi & Abubakr Ayub & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora, 2019. "Pure and Hydrocarbon Binary Mixtures as Possible Alternatives Working Fluids to the Usual Organic Rankine Cycles Biomass Conversion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    6. Costante Mario Invernizzi, 2017. "Prospects of Mixtures as Working Fluids in Real-Gas Brayton Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Abubakr Ayub & Costante M. Invernizzi & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora & Giampaolo Manzolini, 2020. "Carbon Dioxide Mixtures as Working Fluid for High-Temperature Heat Recovery: A Thermodynamic Comparison with Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Maria Portarapillo & Almerinda Di Benedetto, 2021. "Risk Assessment of the Large-Scale Hydrogen Storage in Salt Caverns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Xie, Liangtao & Yang, Jianguo & Yang, Xin & Yu, Yonghua & He, Yuhai & Hu, Nao & Fan, Yu & Sun, Sicong & Dong, Fei & Cao, Bingxin, 2024. "Optimisation of Brayton cycle CO2-based binary mixtures: An application for waste heat recovery of marine low-speed diesel engines exhaust gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    4. Cheng, Kunlin & Yu, Jianchi & Dang, Chaolei & Qin, Jiang & Jing, Wuxing, 2024. "Performance comparison between closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems using supercritical carbon dioxide and helium–xenon mixture at ultra-high turbine inlet temperatures on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    5. Min Xie & Jian Cheng & Xiaohan Ren & Shuo Wang & Pengcheng Che & Chunwei Zhang, 2022. "System Performance Analyses of Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    2. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Paul Tafur-Escanta & Robert Valencia-Chapi & Ignacio López-Paniagua & Luis Coco-Enríquez & Javier Muñoz-Antón, 2021. "Supercritical CO 2 Binary Mixtures for Recompression Brayton s-CO 2 Power Cycles Coupled to Solar Thermal Energy Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    5. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    6. Wang, Yuan & Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Yu, Jianting & Zhang, Chaoli & Wang, Zi, 2023. "Comparative exergoeconomic analysis of atmosphere and pressurized CLC power plants coupled with supercritical CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Giovanni Manente & Mário Costa, 2020. "On the Conceptual Design of Novel Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    8. Zhao, Yu & Chang, Zhiyuan & Zhao, Yuanyang & Yang, Qichao & Liu, Guangbin & Li, Liansheng, 2023. "Performance comparison of three supercritical CO2 solar thermal power systems with compressed fluid and molten salt energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    9. Wang, Di & Han, Xinrui & Li, Haoyu & Li, Xiaoli, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and parameter analysis of solar-coal hybrid power plant based on the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Gotelip, Thiago & Gampe, Uwe & Glos, Stefan, 2022. "Optimization strategies of different SCO2 architectures for gas turbine bottoming cycle applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Guccione, Salvatore & Guedez, Rafael, 2023. "Techno-economic optimization of molten salt based CSP plants through integration of supercritical CO2 cycles and hybridization with PV and electric heaters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    14. Wang, Tianze & Xu, Jinliang & Wang, Zhaofu & Zheng, Haonan & Qi, Jianhui & Liu, Guanglin, 2023. "Irreversible losses, characteristic sizes and efficiencies of sCO2 axial turbines dependent on power capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    15. Liangchuan Wei & Bing Guo & Nanyi Li & Zhonghao Heng, 2023. "Design and Internal Flow Characteristic Investigation of High-Temperature H 2 /Steam-Mixed Working Fluid Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Wang, Kun & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Peiwen & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2018. "A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 109-121.
    17. Yu, Mingzhe & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Yan, Yinlian & Ping, Xu & Pan, Yachao & Xing, Chengda & Yang, Anren, 2024. "Thermoeconomic performance of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle systems for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    18. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    19. Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng & Guo, Jia-Qi & Tong, Zi-Xiang & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2019. "The investigation of thermo-economic performance and conceptual design for the miniaturized lead-cooled fast reactor composing supercritical CO2 power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 174-195.
    20. Vedran Mrzljak & Igor Poljak & Maro Jelić & Jasna Prpić-Oršić, 2023. "Thermodynamic Analysis and Improvement Potential of Helium Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant at Four Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5080-:d:421327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.