IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v82y2015icp61-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower

Author

Listed:
  • Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A.
  • Atif, Maimoon

Abstract

In this study, a thermodynamic comparison of five supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower was conducted. The Brayton cycles analyzed were simple Brayton cycle, regenerative Brayton cycle, recompression Brayton cycle, pre-compression Brayton cycle, and split expansion Brayton cycle. A complete mathematical code was developed to carry out the analysis. A heliostat field layout was generated and then optimized on an annual basis using the differential evolution method, which is an evolutionary algorithm. The heliostat field was optimized for optical performance and then integrated with the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles. Using the results of the optimization, a comparison of net power outputs and thermal efficiencies for these cycles was performed. The findings demonstrated that the highest thermal efficiency was achieved using the recompression Brayton cycle, at June noontime. The maximum integrated system thermal efficiency using this cycle was 40% while the maximum thermal efficiency of this cycle alone was 52%. The regenerative Brayton cycle, although simpler in configuration, shows comparable performance to the recompression Brayton cycle. This analysis was carried out for Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Suggested Citation

  • Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:82:y:2015:i:c:p:61-71
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214014509
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesús, 2013. "A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 142-154.
    2. Singh, Rajinesh & Rowlands, Andrew S. & Miller, Sarah A., 2013. "Effects of relative volume-ratios on dynamic performance of a direct-heated supercritical carbon-dioxide closed Brayton cycle in a solar-thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1025-1032.
    3. Sheu, Elysia J. & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Optimization of a hybrid solar-fossil fuel plant: Solar steam reforming of methane in a combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 193-202.
    4. Singh, Rajinesh & Miller, Sarah A. & Rowlands, Andrew S. & Jacobs, Peter A., 2013. "Dynamic characteristics of a direct-heated supercritical carbon-dioxide Brayton cycle in a solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 194-204.
    5. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesús, 2012. "Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 49-59.
    6. Ho, Clifford K. & Iverson, Brian D., 2014. "Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 835-846.
    7. Singh, Rajinesh & Kearney, Michael P. & Manzie, Chris, 2013. "Extremum-seeking control of a supercritical carbon-dioxide closed Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 380-387.
    8. Zhang, Xin-Rong & Yamaguchi, Hiroshi & Uneno, Daisuke, 2007. "Experimental study on the performance of solar Rankine system using supercritical CO2," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2617-2628.
    9. Zhang, X.R. & Yamaguchi, H. & Uneno, D. & Fujima, K. & Enomoto, M. & Sawada, N., 2006. "Analysis of a novel solar energy-powered Rankine cycle for combined power and heat generation using supercritical carbon dioxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1839-1854.
    10. Le Moullec, Yann, 2013. "Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-46.
    11. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    12. Behar, Omar & Khellaf, Abdallah & Mohammedi, Kamal, 2013. "A review of studies on central receiver solar thermal power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 12-39.
    13. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    2. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    4. Dunham, Marc T. & Iverson, Brian D., 2014. "High-efficiency thermodynamic power cycles for concentrated solar power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 758-770.
    5. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    6. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Medina, A. & Calvo Hernández, A., 2022. "High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2016. "A multivariable optimization of a Brayton power cycle operating with CO2 as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 908-916.
    8. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    9. Al-Sulaiman, F.A., 2016. "On the auxiliary boiler sizing assessment for solar driven supercritical CO2 double recompression Brayton cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 408-418.
    10. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 752-771.
    11. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Arenas, Eva & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2017. "Recuperated versus single-recuperator re-compressed supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 307-317.
    12. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Heras, I. & Gonzalez-Ayala, J. & Medina, A. & Hernández, A. Calvo, 2020. "On-design pre-optimization and off-design analysis of hybrid Brayton thermosolar tower power plants for different fluids and plant configurations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    14. Kouta, Amine & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2017. "Energy analysis of a solar driven cogeneration system using supercritical CO2 power cycle and MEE-TVC desalination system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 996-1009.
    15. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    16. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    17. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    18. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    19. Kim, Min Seok & Ahn, Yoonhan & Kim, Beomjoo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2016. "Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 893-909.
    20. Wang, Jianxing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improvement crossover operation method in genetic algorithm and spatial optimization of heliostat field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 15-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:82:y:2015:i:c:p:61-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.