IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i15p4014-d394217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Dioxide Mixtures as Working Fluid for High-Temperature Heat Recovery: A Thermodynamic Comparison with Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Abubakr Ayub

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Costante M. Invernizzi

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Gioele Di Marcoberardino

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Paolo Iora

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Giampaolo Manzolini

    (Energy Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

This study aims to provide a thermodynamic comparison between supercritical CO 2 cycles and ORC cycles utilizing flue gases as waste heat source. Moreover, the possibility of using CO 2 mixtures as working fluids in transcritical cycles to enhance the performance of the thermodynamic cycle is explored. ORCs operating with pure working fluids show higher cyclic thermal and total efficiencies compared to supercritical CO 2 cycles; thus, they represent a better option for high-temperature waste heat recovery provided that the thermal stability at a higher temperature has been assessed. Based on the improved global thermodynamic performance and good thermal stability of R134a, CO 2 -R134a is investigated as an illustrative, promising working fluid mixture for transcritical power cycles. The results show that a total efficiency of 0.1476 is obtained for the CO 2 -R134a mixture (0.3 mole fraction of R134a) at a maximum cycle pressure of 200 bars, which is 15.86% higher than the supercritical carbon dioxide cycle efficiency of 0.1274, obtained at the comparatively high maximum pressure of 300 bars. Steam cycles, owing to their larger number of required turbine stages and lower power output, did not prove to be a suitable option in this application.

Suggested Citation

  • Abubakr Ayub & Costante M. Invernizzi & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora & Giampaolo Manzolini, 2020. "Carbon Dioxide Mixtures as Working Fluid for High-Temperature Heat Recovery: A Thermodynamic Comparison with Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:4014-:d:394217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/4014/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/4014/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Badur, Janusz & Ziółkowski, Piotr Józef, 2019. "An energetic analysis of a gas turbine with regenerative heating using turbine extraction at intermediate pressure - Brayton cycle advanced according to Szewalski's idea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 763-786.
    2. Kevin McDonnell & Levente Molnár & Mary Harty & Fionnuala Murphy, 2020. "Feasibility Study of Carbon Dioxide Plume Geothermal Systems in Germany−Utilising Carbon Dioxide for Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Invernizzi, Costante M. & Iora, Paolo, 2016. "The exploitation of the physical exergy of liquid natural gas by closed power thermodynamic cycles. An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 2-15.
    4. Costante M. Invernizzi & Abubakr Ayub & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora, 2019. "Pure and Hydrocarbon Binary Mixtures as Possible Alternatives Working Fluids to the Usual Organic Rankine Cycles Biomass Conversion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Danieli, Piero & Rech, Sergio & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 and air Brayton-Joule versus ORC systems for heat recovery from glass furnaces: Performance and economic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 295-309.
    6. Invernizzi, Costante & Bombarda, Paola, 1997. "Thermodynamic performance of selected HCFS for geothermal applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(9), pages 887-895.
    7. Costante Invernizzi & Marco Binotti & Paola Bombarda & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora & Giampaolo Manzolini, 2019. "Water Mixtures as Working Fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Astolfi, Marco & Alfani, Dario & Lasala, Silvia & Macchi, Ennio, 2018. "Comparison between ORC and CO2 power systems for the exploitation of low-medium temperature heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1250-1261.
    9. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    10. Vivian, Jacopo & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2015. "A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 727-746.
    11. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. Costante Mario Invernizzi, 2017. "Prospects of Mixtures as Working Fluids in Real-Gas Brayton Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Liangchuan Wei & Bing Guo & Nanyi Li & Zhonghao Heng, 2023. "Design and Internal Flow Characteristic Investigation of High-Temperature H 2 /Steam-Mixed Working Fluid Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Muhammad Haroon & Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh & Abubakr Ayub & Rasikh Tariq & Farooq Sher & Aklilu Tesfamichael Baheta & Muhammad Imran, 2020. "Exergetic, Economic and Exergo-Environmental Analysis of Bottoming Power Cycles Operating with CO 2 -Based Binary Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Ziwei Chen & Beini He & Xidong Wang, 2023. "Advanced Utilization Technologies of Secondary Energy and Resources from Energy-Intensive Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-3, March.
    5. Mikielewicz, Jarosław & Ochrymiuk, Tomasz & Cenian, Adam, 2022. "Comparison of traditional with low temperature district heating systems based on organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Di Marcoberardino, G. & Morosini, E. & Manzolini, G., 2022. "Preliminary investigation of the influence of equations of state on the performance of CO2 + C6F6 as innovative working fluid in transcritical cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    7. Mikielewicz, Jarosław & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Comparison of traditional district heating with low temperature district heating systems featuring organic Rankine cycle and heat pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    8. Mikielewicz, Dariusz & Mikielewicz, Jarosław, 2022. "Analysis of Organic Rankine Cycle efficiency and vapor generator heat transfer surface in function of the reduced pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costante M. Invernizzi & Abubakr Ayub & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora, 2019. "Pure and Hydrocarbon Binary Mixtures as Possible Alternatives Working Fluids to the Usual Organic Rankine Cycles Biomass Conversion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yan, Yinlian & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Pan, Yachao & Ping, Xu & Ge, Zhong, 2023. "Study on performance evaluation framework and design/ selection guidelines of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle from molecular structure perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Mardan Dezfouli, Amir Hossein & Niroozadeh, Narjes & Jahangiri, Ali, 2023. "Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel geothermal driven power generation system of combined transcritical CO2 and C5H12 ORCs coupled with LNG stream i," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Marcin Jankowski & Aleksandra Borsukiewicz, 2020. "A Novel Exergy Indicator for Maximizing Energy Utilization in Low-Temperature ORC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Liu, Zhan & Liu, Zihui & Cao, Xing & Li, Hailong & Yang, Xiaohu, 2020. "Self-condensing transcritical CO2 cogeneration system with extraction turbine and ejector refrigeration cycle: A techno-economic assessment study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Mohan, Sooraj & Dinesha, P. & Campana, Pietro Elia, 2022. "ANN-PSO aided selection of hydrocarbons as working fluid for low-temperature organic Rankine cycle and thermodynamic evaluation of optimal working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Hærvig, J. & Sørensen, K. & Condra, T.J., 2016. "Guidelines for optimal selection of working fluid for an organic Rankine cycle in relation to waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 592-602.
    9. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    10. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    11. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Giovanni Manente & Mário Costa, 2020. "On the Conceptual Design of Novel Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    13. Dokl, Monika & Gomilšek, Rok & Čuček, Lidija & Abikoye, Ben & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2022. "Maximizing the power output and net present value of organic Rankine cycle: Application to aluminium industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    14. Mustapić, N. & Kralj, Toni & Vujanović, Milan, 2024. "Split flow principle implementation for advanced subcritical double stage organic rankine cycle configuration for geothermal power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    15. Rech, Sergio & Zandarin, Simone & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2017. "Design and off-design models of single and two-stage ORC systems on board a LNG carrier for the search of the optimal performance and control strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 221-241.
    16. Xu, Chi & Kong, Fanli & Yu, Dali & Yu, Jie & Khan, Muhammad Salman, 2021. "Influence of non-ideal gas characteristics on working fluid properties and thermal cycle of space nuclear power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Kolahchian Tabrizi, Mehrshad & Bonalumi, Davide, 2022. "Techno-economic performance of the 2-propanol/1-butanol zeotropic mixture and 2-propanol/water azeotropic mixture as a working fluid in Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Nikolay Rogalev & Andrey Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Olga Zlyvko & Pavel Bryzgunov, 2022. "Review of Closed SCO 2 and Semi-Closed Oxy–Fuel Combustion Power Cycles for Multi-Scale Power Generation in Terms of Energy, Ecology and Economic Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-37, December.
    19. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea, 2018. "SYNTHSEP: A general methodology for the synthesis of energy system configurations beyond superstructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 924-949.
    20. Muhammad Haroon & Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh & Abubakr Ayub & Rasikh Tariq & Farooq Sher & Aklilu Tesfamichael Baheta & Muhammad Imran, 2020. "Exergetic, Economic and Exergo-Environmental Analysis of Bottoming Power Cycles Operating with CO 2 -Based Binary Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:4014-:d:394217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.