IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v293y2024ics0360544224004250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparison between closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems using supercritical carbon dioxide and helium–xenon mixture at ultra-high turbine inlet temperatures on hypersonic vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Kunlin
  • Yu, Jianchi
  • Dang, Chaolei
  • Qin, Jiang
  • Jing, Wuxing

Abstract

Closed-Brayton-cycle (CBC) has considerable potential for power generation on hypersonic vehicles, but its power level is limited by the cold source onboard, commonly the hydrocarbon fuel. To achieve power enhancement of CBC with finite cold source, this study assessed and compared the power output and thermal efficiency of supercritical carbon dioxide (S–CO2) and helium-xenon mixture (He–Xe) CBCs at ultra-high turbine inlet temperature (TIT), taking into account the thermal cracking of hydrocarbon fuel. Results indicate that raising TIT can significantly increase the electric power output for both CBC working fluids. The electric power under per unit mass flowrate of fuel is as high as 1600 kJ/kg at the TIT of 2000 K, making it easy to achieve megawatt-level power generation. The power enhancement of He–Xe CBC is more significant than S–CO2 CBC when the TIT exceeds 2000 K. Moreover, the compressor inlet temperatures and cycle pressure of S–CO2 CBCs are much higher than those of He–Xe CBC, causing additional challenges in the aerodynamic design and component manufacture. Therefore, He–Xe CBC operating at ultra-high TITs may be more suitable than S–CO2 CBCs for high-power electricity generation mission on hypersonic vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Kunlin & Yu, Jianchi & Dang, Chaolei & Qin, Jiang & Jing, Wuxing, 2024. "Performance comparison between closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems using supercritical carbon dioxide and helium–xenon mixture at ultra-high turbine inlet temperatures on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:293:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004250
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224004250
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biondi, Alfonso & Toro, Claudia, 2019. "Closed Brayton Cycles for Power Generation in Space: Modeling, simulation and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 793-802.
    2. Zhang, Duo & Qin, Jiang & Feng, Yu & Ren, Fengzhi & Bao, Wen, 2014. "Performance evaluation of power generation system with fuel vapor turbine onboard hydrocarbon fueled scramjets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 732-741.
    3. Ahn, Yoonhan & Lee, Jekyoung & Kim, Seong Gu & Lee, Jeong Ik & Cha, Jae Eun & Lee, Si-Woo, 2015. "Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 115-127.
    4. Alenezi, A. & Vesely, L. & Kapat, J., 2022. "Exergoeconomic analysis of hybrid sCO2 Brayton power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Li, Xinyu & Qin, Zheng & Dong, Keyong & Wang, Lintao & Lin, Zhimin, 2023. "Experimental study of the startup of a supercritical CO2 recompression power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    6. Muhammad Haroon & Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh & Abubakr Ayub & Rasikh Tariq & Farooq Sher & Aklilu Tesfamichael Baheta & Muhammad Imran, 2020. "Exergetic, Economic and Exergo-Environmental Analysis of Bottoming Power Cycles Operating with CO 2 -Based Binary Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Sun, Hongchuang & Li, Heng & He, Shuai & Zhang, Silong & Bao, Wen, 2019. "Power optimization and comparison between simple recuperated and recompressing supercritical carbon dioxide Closed-Brayton-Cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1189-1201.
    8. Hofer, Markus & Ren, Haikun & Hecker, Frieder & Buck, Michael & Brillert, Dieter & Starflinger, Jörg, 2022. "Simulation, analysis and control of a self-propelling heat removal system using supercritical CO2 under varying boundary conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    9. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    10. Dang, Chaolei & Cheng, Kunlin & Fan, Junhao & Wang, Yilin & Qin, Jiang & Liu, Guodong, 2023. "Performance analysis of fuel vapor turbine and closed-Brayton-cycle combined power generation system for hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    11. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    12. Siddiqui, Muhammad Ehtisham & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Bamasag, Ahmad & Saeed, Usman, 2022. "Adoption of CO2-based binary mixture to operate transcritical Rankine cycle in warm regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1372-1380.
    13. Sun, Enhui & Ji, Hongfu & Wang, Xiangren & Ma, Wenjing & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Jinliang, 2023. "Proposal of multistage mass storage process to approach isothermal heat rejection of semi-closed S–CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    14. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    15. Zhang, Na & Lior, Noam, 2006. "A novel near-zero CO2 emission thermal cycle with LNG cryogenic exergy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1666-1679.
    16. Kim, Sunjin & Cho, Yeonjoo & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2018. "Characteristics and optimization of supercritical CO2 recompression power cycle and the influence of pinch point temperature difference of recuperators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1216-1226.
    17. Delsoto, G.S. & Battisti, F.G. & da Silva, A.K., 2023. "Dynamic modeling and control of a solar-powered Brayton cycle using supercritical CO2 and optimization of its thermal energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 336-356.
    18. Dunham, Marc T. & Iverson, Brian D., 2014. "High-efficiency thermodynamic power cycles for concentrated solar power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 758-770.
    19. Ni, Hang & Qu, Xinhe & Peng, Wei & Zhao, Gang & Zhang, Ping, 2023. "Study of two innovative hydrogen and electricity co-production systems based on very-high-temperature gas-cooled reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Sun, Hongchuang & Li, Heng & He, Shuai & Zhang, Silong & Bao, Wen, 2019. "Power optimization and comparison between simple recuperated and recompressing supercritical carbon dioxide Closed-Brayton-Cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1189-1201.
    2. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Zhang, Duo & Bao, Wen & Jing, Wuxing, 2022. "Performance evaluation for a combined power generation system of closed-Brayton-cycle and thermoelectric generator with finite cold source at room temperature on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    3. Dang, Chaolei & Cheng, Kunlin & Fan, Junhao & Wang, Yilin & Qin, Jiang & Liu, Guodong, 2023. "Performance analysis of fuel vapor turbine and closed-Brayton-cycle combined power generation system for hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    5. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    6. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 752-771.
    8. Cheng, Kunlin & Xu, Jing & Dang, Chaolei & Qin, Jiang & Jing, Wuxing, 2022. "Performance evaluation of fuel indirect cooling based thermal management system using liquid metal for hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Park, Joo Hyun & Park, Hyun Sun & Kwon, Jin Gyu & Kim, Tae Ho & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 520-535.
    10. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    12. Liu, Zhan & Zhang, Yilun & Lv, Xinyu & Zhang, Yao & Liu, Junwei & Su, Chuanqi & Liu, Xianglei, 2023. "An electricity supply system by recovering the waste heat of commercial aeroengine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    13. Liao, Gaoliang & E, Jiaqiang & Zhang, Feng & Chen, Jingwei & Leng, Erwei, 2020. "Advanced exergy analysis for Organic Rankine Cycle-based layout to recover waste heat of flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    15. Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    16. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    17. Ma, Xiaofeng & Jiang, Peixue & Zhu, Yinhai, 2023. "Modeling and performance analysis of a pre-cooling and power generation system based on the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle on turbine-based combined cycle engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    18. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    19. Kim, Sunjin & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2020. "Parametric study and optimization of closed Brayton power cycle considering the charge amount of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:293:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.