IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p4050-d588737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supercritical CO 2 Binary Mixtures for Recompression Brayton s-CO 2 Power Cycles Coupled to Solar Thermal Energy Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Tafur-Escanta

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Robert Valencia-Chapi

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
    Facultad de Ingeniería en Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio, 5-21, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador
    Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación Energética S.L. C/Oria, 16, 28002 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ignacio López-Paniagua

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Luis Coco-Enríquez

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Javier Muñoz-Antón

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

In this work, an evaluation and quantification of the impact of using mixtures based on supercritical carbon dioxide “s-CO 2 ” (s-CO 2 /COS, s-CO 2 /H 2 S, s-CO 2 /NH 3 , s-CO 2 /SO 2 ) are made as a working fluid in simple and complex recompression Brayton s-CO 2 power cycle configurations that have pressure drops in their components. These cycles are coupled with a solar thermal plant with parabolic-trough collector (PTC) technology. The methodology used in the calculation performance is to establish values of the heat recuperator total conductance (UA total ) between 5 and 25 MW/K. The main conclusion of this work is that the cycle’s efficiency has improved due to using s-CO 2 mixtures as working fluid; this is significant compared to the results obtained using the standard fluid (pure s-CO 2 ). Furthermore, a techno-economic analysis is carried out that compares each configuration’s costs using pure s-CO 2 and a mixture of s-CO 2 /COS with a molar fraction (70/30), respectively, as working fluid where relevant results are obtained. These results show that the best configuration in terms of thermal efficiency and cost is the RCC-RH for pure sCO 2 with values of 41.25% and 2811 $/kWe, while for the mixture sCO 2 /COS, the RCC-2RH configuration with values of 45.05% and 2621 $/kWe is optimal. Using the mixture costs 6.75% less than if it is used the standard fluid (s-CO 2 ).

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Tafur-Escanta & Robert Valencia-Chapi & Ignacio López-Paniagua & Luis Coco-Enríquez & Javier Muñoz-Antón, 2021. "Supercritical CO 2 Binary Mixtures for Recompression Brayton s-CO 2 Power Cycles Coupled to Solar Thermal Energy Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:4050-:d:588737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/4050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/4050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    2. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    3. Linares, José I. & Montes, María J. & Cantizano, Alexis & Sánchez, Consuelo, 2020. "A novel supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle for power tower concentrating solar plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    5. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    6. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    7. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    8. de la Calle, Alberto & Bayon, Alicia & Soo Too, Yen Chean, 2018. "Impact of ambient temperature on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle in arid locations: Finding the optimal design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1016-1027.
    9. Wang, Kun & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Peiwen & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2018. "A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 109-121.
    10. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tafur-Escanta, Paul & López-Paniagua, Ignacio & Muñoz-Antón, Javier, 2023. "Thermodynamics analysis of the supercritical CO2 binary mixtures for Brayton power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    3. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    5. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Tafur-Escanta, Paul & López-Paniagua, Ignacio & Muñoz-Antón, Javier, 2023. "Thermodynamics analysis of the supercritical CO2 binary mixtures for Brayton power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    10. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    12. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2021. "Off-design and annual performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with thermal storage for CSP application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    13. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    15. Saeed, Muhammad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "A newly proposed supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle configuration to enhance energy sources integration capability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    16. Niu, Xiaojuan & Ma, Ning & Bu, Zhengkun & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures for solar power tower system application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    17. Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Peng & Sun, Xiangyu & Zhao, Ben, 2022. "Analysis on thermodynamic and economic performances of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle with the dynamic component models and constraint conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    18. Xinyu Zhang & Yunting Ge, 2023. "Power Generation with Renewable Energy and Advanced Supercritical CO 2 Thermodynamic Power Cycles: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    19. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    20. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:4050-:d:588737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.