IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v282y2023ics0360544223022016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparison of three supercritical CO2 solar thermal power systems with compressed fluid and molten salt energy storage

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yu
  • Chang, Zhiyuan
  • Zhao, Yuanyang
  • Yang, Qichao
  • Liu, Guangbin
  • Li, Liansheng

Abstract

In recent years, the supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) Brayton cycle power generation system has gradually attracted the attention of academics as a solar thermal power generation technology. To achieve the stable and effective use of solar energy, three sCO2 solar power generation systems were studied in this paper. These systems included a molten salt thermal storage system, a compressed CO2 energy storage system, and a combined molten salt thermal storage and compressed CO2 energy storage system. The thermodynamic analysis model of the sCO2 power generation system is constructed, and a mathematical model of the solar power tower system is produced. The operating conditions, thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, and economics of these three systems on typical days are investigated and compared. The results indicate that the power generation system coupled with compressed CO2 storage has higher thermal and exergy efficiencies than the other two systems with the same daily heliostat field. The thermal efficiencies can be as high as 6.56% and 5.91% respectively, and the exergy efficiencies as high as 5.76% and 6.22% respectively. The system coupled with compressed CO2 energy storage is more cost-effective and has a shorter payback period than the system coupled with molten salt thermal storage system and the system with both forms of energy storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yu & Chang, Zhiyuan & Zhao, Yuanyang & Yang, Qichao & Liu, Guangbin & Li, Liansheng, 2023. "Performance comparison of three supercritical CO2 solar thermal power systems with compressed fluid and molten salt energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223022016
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223022016
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Rajinesh & Rowlands, Andrew S. & Miller, Sarah A., 2013. "Effects of relative volume-ratios on dynamic performance of a direct-heated supercritical carbon-dioxide closed Brayton cycle in a solar-thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1025-1032.
    2. Medrano, Marc & Gil, Antoni & Martorell, Ingrid & Potau, Xavi & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2010. "State of the art on high-temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. Part 2--Case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 56-72, January.
    3. Silveira, Jose Luz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz, 2013. "The need of subsidy for the implementation of photovoltaic solar energy as supporting of decentralized electrical power generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 133-141.
    4. Wang, Gang & Dong, Boyi & Chen, Zeshao, 2021. "Design and behaviour estimate of a novel concentrated solar-driven power and desalination system using S–CO2 Brayton cycle and MSF technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 555-564.
    5. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    6. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    7. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Gillard, Jonathon & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis, optimisation and systematic integration of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with sensible heat thermal energy storage for CSP application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    8. Ghirardi, Elisa & Brumana, Giovanni & Franchini, Giuseppe & Perdichizzi, Antonio, 2021. "Heliostat layout optimization for load-following solar tower plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 393-405.
    9. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    10. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    11. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    12. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2021. "Off-design and annual performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with thermal storage for CSP application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    13. Gil, Antoni & Medrano, Marc & Martorell, Ingrid & Lázaro, Ana & Dolado, Pablo & Zalba, Belén & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2010. "State of the art on high temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. Part 1--Concepts, materials and modellization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 31-55, January.
    14. Sarkar, Jahar, 2009. "Second law analysis of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1172-1178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yunxia & Zhao, Yuanyang & Yang, Qichao & Liu, Guangbin & Li, Liansheng, 2024. "Research on compression process and compressors in supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    2. Ma, Tingshan & Li, Zhengkuan & Lv, Kai & Chang, Dongfeng & Hu, Wenshuai & Zou, Ying, 2024. "Design and performance analysis of deep peak shaving scheme for thermal power units based on high-temperature molten salt heat storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Ma, Yuegeng & Zhang, Xuwei & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2018. "Proposal and assessment of a novel supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with LiBr absorption chiller for concentrated solar power applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 839-854.
    3. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    4. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    5. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    6. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    7. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    9. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2016. "A multivariable optimization of a Brayton power cycle operating with CO2 as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 908-916.
    11. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    12. Wang, Di & Han, Xinrui & Li, Haoyu & Li, Xiaoli, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and parameter analysis of solar-coal hybrid power plant based on the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Dynamic modelling and start-up operation of a solar-assisted recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 247-263.
    14. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    15. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    16. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Duniam, Sam & Li, Jishun & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2019. "Effect of cooling system design on the performance of the recompression CO2 cycle for concentrated solar power application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 480-494.
    17. Park, Joo Hyun & Park, Hyun Sun & Kwon, Jin Gyu & Kim, Tae Ho & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 520-535.
    18. Yılmaz, İbrahim Halil & Mwesigye, Aggrey & Kılıç, Fatih, 2023. "Prioritization of heat transfer fluids in parabolic trough solar systems using CFD-assisted AHP-VIKOR approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 751-768.
    19. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    20. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223022016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.