IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i4p116-d1617350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Dynamics and Ambidextrous Innovation: Insights from Saudi Arabia’s Project-Based Organizations—A Thematic–Explorative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad AlSaied

    (School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Patrick McLaughlin

    (School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Mohamed Afy-Shararah

    (School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

  • John Patsavellas

    (School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Abdullah Alkhoraif

    (Business Administration Department, College of Administrative and Finance, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 13316, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The implementation of ambidextrous innovation in project organizations within the cultures of the Global South, such as Saudi Arabia, is a significant problem. Organizational culture is positioned as a key factor that can help project organizations in cultures such as Saudi Arabia to implement ambidexterity as a key innovation framework. However, knowledge of ambidextrous innovations in such an important cultural and organizational context is highly limited. Thus, the aim of the present research is to explore key cultural aspects and themes based on action and a grounded theory research approach that can help organizations employ projects as a key work structure to implement ambidextrous innovations in project management offices (PMOs) in Saudi Arabia. To achieve this aim, the current study employed in-depth semi-structured interviews with 36 participants. The results, employing open coding procedures as a tool of data analysis using the NVivo 14.0 software package, revealed 62 key cultural aspects that can be critical in implementing the innovation of ambidexterity. To further validate and triangulate the findings, inter-rater reliability was undertaken with the help of two experts, and two sessions of focus group discussions were also conducted. The first session of the focus group helped us critically evaluate and filter the cultural aspects, resulting in the final 56 key cultural aspects. The second focus group session was undertaken with participants with the aim of grouping aspects into theoretical themes, which resulted in 10 themes. The research is novel in that it addresses both project organizations and the culture of the Global South, including Saudi Arabia. Empirical research needs to be conducted to predict and achieve other key outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad AlSaied & Patrick McLaughlin & Mohamed Afy-Shararah & John Patsavellas & Abdullah Alkhoraif, 2025. "Cultural Dynamics and Ambidextrous Innovation: Insights from Saudi Arabia’s Project-Based Organizations—A Thematic–Explorative Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-38, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:116-:d:1617350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/4/116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/4/116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Mohiya & M. M. Sulphey, 2021. "Do Saudi Arabian Leaders Exhibit Ambidextrous Leadership: A Qualitative Examination," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    2. Paul J. Gertler & Sebastian Martinez & Patrick Premand & Laura B. Rawlings & Christel M. J. Vermeersch, 2016. "Impact Evaluation in Practice, Second Edition," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 25030.
    3. Ulrich Wassmer & Sali Li & Anoop Madhok, 2017. "Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 384-394, February.
    4. James J. Heckman & Chase O. Corbin, 2016. "Capabilities and Skills," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 342-359, July.
    5. Matti J. Haverila & Kai C. Haverila, 2019. "Customer centric success measures in project management," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 203-222.
    6. Muhammed Kürşad Özlen & Meliha Handzic, 2020. "Ambidextrous Organisations from the Perspective of Employed Knowledge Management Strategies: Evidence from Turkey," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Kraus, Sascha & Schiavone, Francesco & Pluzhnikova, Anna & Invernizzi, Anna Chiara, 2021. "Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 557-567.
    8. Yang, Miaomiao & Wang, Juanru & Zhang, Xiaodi, 2021. "Boundary-spanning search and sustainable competitive advantage: The mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 290-299.
    9. Wen Zhang & Xiaoshuang Zeng & Huigang Liang & Yajiong Xue & Xuanze Cao, 2023. "Understanding How Organizational Culture Affects Innovation Performance: A Management Context Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Junyoung Park & Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "A Sustainable Project Management Strategy against Multitasking Situations from the Viewpoints of Cognitive Mechanism and Motivational Belief," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Justin J.P. Jansen & Frans A.J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2005. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, And Ambidexterity: The Impact Of Environmental And Organizational Antecedents," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 57(4), pages 351-363, October.
    12. Hongxia Peng, 2019. "Organizational ambidexterity in public non-profit organizations: interest and limits," Post-Print hal-01918402, HAL.
    13. Mohd Aliff Abdul Majid & Mohhidin Othman & Siti Fatimah Mohamad & Sarina Abdul Halim Lim & Aziz Yusof, 2017. "Piloting for Interviews in Qualitative Research: Operationalization and Lessons Learnt," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 1073-1080, April.
    14. Zhang, Zhengang & Luo, Taiye, 2020. "Network capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations——from the perspective of network dynamics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Mohammad AlSaied & Patrick McLaughlin, 2024. "Ambidextrous Innovation in Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, July.
    16. Amit Kumar Gupta & Narain Gupta, 2019. "Innovation and Culture as a Dynamic Capability for Firm Performance: A Study from Emerging Markets," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(4), pages 323-336, December.
    17. Mohammad AlSaied & Patrick McLaughlin, 2024. "Organizational Culture Enabler and Inhibitor Factors for Ambidextrous Innovation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Norbert Kailer & Alexandra Weinmann & Nuria Chaparro-Banegas & Norat Roig-Tierno, 2021. "Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    19. Simeoni, Francesca & Brunetti, Federico & Mion, Giorgio & Baratta, Rossella, 2020. "Ambidextrous organizations for sustainable development: The case of fair-trade systems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 549-560.
    20. Beata Mrugalska & Junaid Ahmed, 2021. "Organizational Agility in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    21. Ulrich Wassmer & Sali Li & Anoop Madhok, 2017. "Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance," Post-Print hal-02313356, HAL.
    22. Lisa Larsson & Johan Larsson, 2018. "Sustainable Development in Project-Based Industries–Supporting the Realization of Explorative Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    23. Justin J. P. Jansen & Gerard George & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2008. "Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 982-1007, July.
    24. Hogan, Suellen J. & Coote, Leonard V., 2014. "Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1609-1621.
    25. Anouk Decuypere & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2021. "Exploring the Leadership–Engagement Nexus: A Moderated Meta-Analysis and Review of Explaining Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-34, August.
    26. Alfred Rappaport, 2005. "The Economics of Short-Term Performance Obsession," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(3), pages 65-79, May.
    27. Babu, A. J. G. & Suresh, Nalina, 1996. "Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 320-327, January.
    28. Sher Jahan Khan & Ajaz Akbar Mir, 2019. "Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 652-663, May.
    29. Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Hongwei, 2021. "How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 299-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David B. Audretsch & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "Is ambidexterity the missing link between entrepreneurship, management, and innovation?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1891-1918, December.
    2. Belén Payán‐Sánchez & Miguel Pérez‐Valls & José Antonio Plaza‐Úbeda & Diego Vázquez‐Brust, 2022. "Network ambidexterity and environmental performance: Code‐sharing in the airline industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1169-1183, March.
    3. Ju, Xiaowei & Wang, Guanhua, 2023. "How do network ties affect firm performance growth and its variability? The mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative knowledge utilization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Jiang, Zihao & Liu, Zhiying, 2022. "Policies and exploitative and exploratory innovations of the wind power industry in China: The role of technological path dependence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Bo Zhao & Li Lv & Xiaojuan Luo & Xinzao Huang, 2025. "The Impact of Multidimensional Relational Network Embedding on the Carbon Emission Reductions of Manufacturing Enterprises: From the Mediating and Regulating Roles of Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Partanen, Jukka & Kohtamäki, Marko & Patel, Pankaj C. & Parida, Vinit, 2020. "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Stienstra, Miranda, 2020. "The determinants and performance implications of alliance partner acquisition," Other publications TiSEM 7fdee0c2-d4d2-4f5b-95e3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Choi, Young Rok & Phan, Phillip H. & Choi, Jaepil, 2020. "Formal governance, interfirm coordination, and performance in partnerships: An empirical investigation of a mediation model," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 413-424.
    9. José Andrade & Mário Franco & Luis Mendes, 2021. "Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2111-2136, October.
    10. Basile, L.J. & Carbonara, N. & Panniello, U. & Pellegrino, R., 2024. "The role of big data analytics in improving the quality of healthcare services in the Italian context: The mediating role of risk management," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Jinkai Liang & Ke Du & Dandan Chen, 2023. "The Effect of Digitalization on Ambidextrous Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises: A Perspective of Empowering and Enabling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Manuela N. Hoehn-Weiss & Samina Karim & Chi-Hyon Lee, 2017. "Examining Alliance Portfolios Beyond the Dyads: The Relevance of Redundancy and Nonuniformity Across and Between Partners," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 56-73, February.
    13. Zhang, Guiyang & Gao, Yuchen & Qi, Yong, 2022. "National depth and R&D alliance portfolio international expansion: The moderation of technological discontinuity and long-term orientation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Carla Santos Pereira & Natercia Durão & Fernando Moreira & Bruno Veloso, 2022. "The Importance of Digital Transformation in International Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Priyanka, & Jain, Mahima & Dhir, Sanjay, 2022. "Antecedents of organization ambidexterity: A comparative study of public and private sector organizations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Xin Tan & Jinfang Jiao & Ming Jiang & Ming Chen & Wenpeng Wang & Yijun Sun, 2024. "Digital Policy, Green Innovation, and Digital-Intelligent Transformation of Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Ku-Ho Lin, 2019. "Impact of Ambidexterity and Environmental Dynamism on Dynamic Capability Development Trade-Offs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Mariotti, Francesca & Haider, Sajjad, 2020. "Managing institutional diversity and structural holes: Network configurations for recombinant innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    20. Jie Liang & Peng Shao, 2019. "Sequential Alliance Portfolios, Partner Reconfiguration and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:116-:d:1617350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.