IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1655-d1592773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Multidimensional Relational Network Embedding on the Carbon Emission Reductions of Manufacturing Enterprises: From the Mediating and Regulating Roles of Technological Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Zhao

    (Jiangxi Economic Development Research Institute, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Li Lv

    (Jiangxi Economic Development Research Institute, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Xiaojuan Luo

    (Jiangxi Economic Development Research Institute, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Xinzao Huang

    (Regional Development Research Institute, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

Abstract

Promoting low-carbon, green development in the industrial sector is crucial for the sustainable development of the economy and society in China. As the micro-entity of industrial carbon reduction, the question of how to enhance the carbon reduction capacity of industrial enterprises has attracted widespread attention. Research suggests that a multidimensional relationship network, consisting of government, market, industry, and public networks and network reputation, significantly influences enterprises’ carbon emission performance. Based on the survey data of 1226 manufacturing enterprises, this study empirically examines the impact of multidimensional relationship network on the carbon emissions of enterprises and its mechanism from a micro-perspective. The findings reveal that relational network embedding significantly reduces the carbon emission intensity, and the reduction effect becomes stronger as the embedding degree increases. Compared to the government and industry networks, the market network, public network, and network reputation have a more significant impact on carbon emission reduction. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the reduction effect is more significant in enterprises with a higher carbon emission intensity and digital level. The mechanism analysis also highlights the role of technological innovation as a mediator and regulator in strengthening the carbon emission reduction effect of relationship network embedding.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Zhao & Li Lv & Xiaojuan Luo & Xinzao Huang, 2025. "The Impact of Multidimensional Relational Network Embedding on the Carbon Emission Reductions of Manufacturing Enterprises: From the Mediating and Regulating Roles of Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1655-:d:1592773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1655/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1655/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taimin Li & Afzal Izzaz Zahari & Soliha Sanusi, 2023. "The Sustainability of Technological Innovation in China: From the Perspective of Network Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Eli Berman & Linda T. M. Bui, 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Productivity: Evidence From Oil Refineries," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(3), pages 498-510, August.
    3. Bartram, Söhnke M. & Hou, Kewei & Kim, Sehoon, 2022. "Real effects of climate policy: Financial constraints and spillovers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 668-696.
    4. Xu, Jinghang & Guan, Yuru & Oldfield, Jonathan & Guan, Dabo & Shan, Yuli, 2024. "China carbon emission accounts 2020-2021," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    5. Ulrich Wassmer & Sali Li & Anoop Madhok, 2017. "Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 384-394, February.
    6. Granovetter, Mark, 1995. "Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern Economy," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 4(1), pages 93-130.
    7. Mara Faccio, 2006. "Politically Connected Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 369-386, March.
    8. Zhou, Jingyu & Liu, Weibai, 2024. "Carbon Reduction Effects of Digital Technology Transformation: Evidence from the Listed Manufacturing Firms in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Xie, Rui & Zhang, Jiahuan & Tang, Chuan, 2023. "Political connection and water pollution: New evidence from Chinese listed firms," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Fisman, Raymond & Svensson, Jakob, 2007. "Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 63-75, May.
    11. Corey C. Phelps, 2010. "A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation," Post-Print hal-00528392, HAL.
    12. Zoltan J. Acs & Luc Anselin & Attila Varga, 2008. "Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 11, pages 135-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Wang, Zongrun & Fu, Haiqin & Ren, Xiaohang, 2023. "Political connections and corporate carbon emission: New evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Ulrich Wassmer & Sali Li & Anoop Madhok, 2017. "Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance," Post-Print hal-02313356, HAL.
    15. Chang, Lulu & Fang, Senhui, 2024. "Climate actions and corporate carbon emissions along the supply chain," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Asim Ijaz Khwaja & Atif Mian, 2005. "Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 120(4), pages 1371-1411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Chen & Lin, Ping & Song, Frank, 2010. "Property rights protection and corporate R&D: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 49-62, September.
    2. Yan Leung Cheung & P. Raghavendra Rau & Aris Stouraitis, 2012. "How much do firms pay as bribes and what benefits do they get? Evidence from corruption cases worldwide," NBER Working Papers 17981, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Li, Guangzi & Chan, Kam C., 2021. "Anti-corruption intensity and loan contracting: Evidence from non-state owned firms in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Colonnelli, Emanuele & Lagaras, Spyridon & Ponticelli, Jacopo & Prem, Mounu & Tsoutsoura, Margarita, 2022. "Revealing corruption: Firm and worker level evidence from Brazil," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 1097-1119.
    5. Chung, Chi-Nien & Mahmood, Ishtiaq & Mitchell, Will, 2009. "Political Connections and Business Strategy: The Impact of Types and Destinations of Political Ties on Business Diversification in Closed and Open Political Economic," CEI Working Paper Series 2008-24, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    6. Raymond Fisman & Yongxiang Wang, 2015. "The Mortality Cost of Political Connections," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(4), pages 1346-1382.
    7. Mariotti, Francesca & Haider, Sajjad, 2020. "Managing institutional diversity and structural holes: Network configurations for recombinant innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Lei Cheng & Zhen Lei, 2015. "Does the expansion of Chinese state-owned enterprises affect the innovative behavior of private enterprises?," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 24-54, March.
    9. Long,Cheryl Xiaoning & Xu,L. Colin & Yang,Jin, 2020. "Business Environment and Dual-Track Private Sector Development : China's Experience in Two Crucial Decades," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9161, The World Bank.
    10. Xie, Rui & Zhang, Jiahuan & Tang, Chuan, 2023. "Political connection and water pollution: New evidence from Chinese listed firms," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Banerjee, Rajabrata & Gupta, Kartick & Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar, 2022. "Does corrupt practice increase the implied cost of equity?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Burhan Can Karahasan & Fırat Bilgel, 2020. "State–Business Relations, Financial Access and Firm Performance: A Causal Mediation Analysis," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1033-1074, October.
    13. Akouwerabou B. Denis, 2016. "Entrepreneurs Establishing Political Connection," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, August.
    14. Ren, Haohan & Zhao, Xiaofeng, 2020. "Anticorruption, political connections, and corporate cash policy: Evidence from politician downfalls in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    15. Fu, Tong & Yang, Siying & Jian, Ze, 2022. "Government support for environmental regulation: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    16. Ju, Xiaowei & Wang, Guanhua, 2023. "How do network ties affect firm performance growth and its variability? The mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative knowledge utilization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Saibal Ghosh, 2023. "Political connections and bank behaviour," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 52(1), February.
    18. Hohberger, Jan & Kruger, Heidi & Almeida, Paul, 2020. "Does separation hurt? The impact of premature termination of R&D alliances on knowledge acquisition and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    19. Christopher R. Penney & James G. Combs, 2020. "A Transaction Cost Perspective of Alliance Portfolio Diversity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1073-1105, September.
    20. Haoxiang Tong & Boya Yu & Jing Wu & Guanping Zhou, 2020. "Political Connections, Financial Constraints and Long-term Growth," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 1-4.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1655-:d:1592773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.