IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i9p207-d1472534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Culture Enabler and Inhibitor Factors for Ambidextrous Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad AlSaied

    (School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Patrick McLaughlin

    (School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

Abstract

Ambidextrous innovation is considered to be a key framework for innovation that offers organizations the ability to maintain their current level of competitiveness and develop and sustain a long-term competitive advantage. However, the implementation of ambidextrous innovation is constrained by an organization’s culture. Thus, the aim and objective of the present research are to explore the literature deeply and attempt to understand both organizational culture and ambidextrous innovation, along with key cultural aspects with regard to ambidexterity. The present research deeply dived into the model of organizational culture and attempted to build synergy between each model with respect to ambidexterity. The results of the present research suggest that Cameron and Quinn’s competing value framework, once amalgamated with the Schein model, creates an organizational culture framework that can be used to develop a culture that is best suited to the implementation of ambidextrous innovation. The Schein model provides a comprehensive guideline for each value of the competing value framework. Further, the present research also extracted key insights with regard to the role culture can play in innovation in general and ambidextrous innovation in particular. Finally, the present research also attempted to build a list of culture enablers and inhibitors that can facilitate and impede the process of ambidextrous innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad AlSaied & Patrick McLaughlin, 2024. "Organizational Culture Enabler and Inhibitor Factors for Ambidextrous Innovation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:207-:d:1472534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/9/207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/9/207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristian Peters & Paul Buijs, 2022. "Strategic ambidexterity in green product innovation: Obstacles and implications," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 173-193, January.
    2. Meehee Cho & Mark A. Bonn & Su Jin Han, 2020. "Innovation ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for startup and established restaurants and impacts upon performance," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 340-362, April.
    3. Hogan, Suellen J. & Coote, Leonard V., 2014. "Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1609-1621.
    4. Cai, Ying & Lin, Jun & Zhang, Ruxin, 2023. "When and how to implement design thinking in the innovation process: A longitudinal case study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Groza, Mark D. & Groza, Mya Pronschinske, 2018. "Salesperson regulatory knowledge and sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 37-46.
    2. Martín-Rojas, Rodrigo & Garrido-Moreno, Aurora & García-Morales, Víctor J., 2023. "Social media use, corporate entrepreneurship and organizational resilience: A recipe for SMEs success in a post-Covid scenario," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.
    4. Martínez-Caro, Eva & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Alfonso-Ruiz, Francisco Javier, 2020. "Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Rosselyn Pacheco & Elizabete Monteiro & Carolina Santos, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainable Innovation Strategies for Increased Competition among Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Burrell Darrell Norman, 2020. "Management Consulting Intervention Case Study in a Complex and Toxic Hospital Organizational Culture," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 100-114, August.
    7. Rieger, Verena & Klarmann, Martin, 2022. "The effect of cooperative team culture on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1256-1271.
    8. Widodo & Chandrawaty, 2021. "Exploring The Principals' Visionary Leaderships' Effect on School Organizational Culture and Teachers' Affective Commitment," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 21-30, April.
    9. Phu Nguyen-Van & Tuyen Tiet & Quoc Tran-Nam, 2024. "Synergy in environmental compliance, innovation and export on SMEs' growth," Working Papers hal-04441426, HAL.
    10. Azeem, Muhammad & Ahmed, Munir & Haider, Sajid & Sajjad, Muhammad, 2021. "Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Tjaša Štrukelj & Jelena Nikolić & Dejana Zlatanović & Simona Sternad Zabukovšek, 2020. "A Strategic Model for Sustainable Business Policy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-28, January.
    12. Dr. Ali Raza & Dr. Sheema Matloob & Dr. Muzafar Hussain Shah & Dr. Irshad Hussain Sarki, 2023. "Leadership Styles And Sustainable Competitive Performance In Pakistani Smes: An Industry 4.0 Perspective," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 138-149.
    13. Edgar Antonio Sánchez‐Báez & José Fernández‐Serrano & Isidoro Romero, 2020. "Organizational culture and innovation in small businesses in Paraguay," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 233-247, April.
    14. Volery, Thierry & Tarabashkina, Liudmila, 2021. "The impact of organisational support, employee creativity and work centrality on innovative work behaviour," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 295-303.
    15. Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek, 2019. "Modelling collaboration and innovation in creative industries using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 981-1006, June.
    16. Manzi-Puertas, Mario A. & Agirre-Aramburu, Izaskun & López-Pérez, Sain, 2024. "Navigating the student entrepreneurial journey: Dynamics and interplay of resourceful and innovative behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Domingo García Pérez-De-Lema & Peter Bent Hansen & Antonia Madrid-Gujjarro & Jane Lucia Silva-Santos, 2019. "INFLUENCE OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN THE DYNAMICS OF INNOVATION AND IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Solaimani, Sam & Haghighi Talab, Ardalan & van der Rhee, Bo, 2019. "An integrative view on Lean innovation management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 109-120.
    19. Leslie A. Laam & George Godlewski & Wayne Psek, 2023. "A description and mathematization of an adaptation-based culture mechanism," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 363-390, June.
    20. Yongrong Xin & Ume Laila & Shuo Zhang, 2024. "Modeling the influence of green innovation on environmental sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises: A way towards sustainable development," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(2), pages 779-794, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:207-:d:1472534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.