IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p6912-d294260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sustainable Project Management Strategy against Multitasking Situations from the Viewpoints of Cognitive Mechanism and Motivational Belief

Author

Listed:
  • Junyoung Park

    (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea)

  • Do-Hyung Park

    (School of Management Information Systems, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea)

Abstract

In modern society, multitasking is necessary for a worker to accomplish a final goal by their deadline, which could be pursued for either a single goal or multiple goals. Moreover, a worker who has the authority to prioritize their tasks can make plans about the process of behavioral strategies to perform each task by making a to-do list. This strategy is a way of unpacking that which seems to affect the expectancy of goal attainment and heighten the value and importance of the goal. Otherwise, a worker could write a to-do list without specific action plans. These effects of unpacking and packing can be used as management strategies for multitasking engagement and could impact a worker’s cognition differently depending on the goal relations, including if there is a single goal or multiple goals. On the one hand, in pursuit of a single goal, unpacking can facilitate a worker’s judgment of the importance of the task. On the other hand, in pursuit of multiple goals, a worker’s judgment of one task’s importance can conflict with another task due to contradictory unpacking guidelines. Additionally, self-regulation as an intrinsic motivation empowers conscious intentions to neglect the cognitive effects of the to-do list. Therefore, those with low self-regulation tend to be encouraged by the effect of unpacking, but those with high self-regulation have the effects of unpacking inhibited. This theoretical model was constructed to identify the cognitive mechanism and the role of self-regulation on boundary conditions in regard to the different effects on unpacking. This study was confirmed via the two-way experiment (single- and multiple-goal x packing and unpacking) to explore the effects of the cognitive mechanism on task importance. The following test was performed via the three-way experiment, using an additional variable, the levels of self-regulation (low self-regulation and high self-regulation), to verify whether they inhibit cognitive effects. This study suggests that the judgment of task importance is different in accordance with goal relations, packing and unpacking, and self-regulations for sustainable management strategies of multitasking.

Suggested Citation

  • Junyoung Park & Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "A Sustainable Project Management Strategy against Multitasking Situations from the Viewpoints of Cognitive Mechanism and Motivational Belief," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6912-:d:294260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6912/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6912/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayelet Fishbach & Ravi Dhar, 2005. "Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 370-377, December.
    2. Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "Virtuality Changes Consumer Preference: The Effect of Transaction Virtuality as Psychological Distance on Consumer Purchase Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Matjaž Perc & Mahmut Ozer & Janja Hojnik, 2019. "Correction: Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, December.
    4. Swait, Joffre & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2001. "The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 135-148, June.
    5. Nidhi Agrawal & Echo Wen Wan, 2009. "Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 448-462.
    6. Kivetz, Ran & Simonson, Itamar, 2002. "Self-Control for the Righteous: Toward a Theory of Precommitment to Indulgence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 199-217, September.
    7. Amy N. Dalton & Stephen A. Spiller, 2012. "Too Much of a Good Thing: The Benefits of Implementation Intentions Depend on the Number of Goals," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 600-614.
    8. Matjaž Perc & Mahmut Ozer & Janja Hojnik, 2019. "Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Sungwook Lee & Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "Community Attachment Formation and Its Influence on Sustainable Participation in a Digitalized Community: Focusing on Content and Social Capital of an Online Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khansa Hayat & Maryam Hafeez & Kanwal Bilal & Malik Shahzad Shabbir, 2022. "Interactive Effects of Organizational Structure and Team Work Quality on Project Success in Project Based Non ProfitOrganizations," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(1), pages 84-103, March.
    2. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "Did You Invest Less Than Me? The Effect of Other’s Share of Investment on Psychological Ownership of Crowdfunding Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmut Ozer & Matjaž Perc, 2020. "Dreams and realities of school tracking and vocational education," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Elias Fernández Domingos & Inês Terrucha & Rémi Suchon & Jelena Grujić & Juan Burguillo & Francisco Santos & Tom Lenaerts, 2022. "Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma," Post-Print hal-04296038, HAL.
    3. Huang, Jiechen & Wang, Juan & Xia, Chengyi, 2020. "Role of vaccine efficacy in the vaccination behavior under myopic update rule on complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Xuli Tang & Xin Li & Feicheng Ma, 2022. "Internationalizing AI: evolution and impact of distance factors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 181-205, January.
    5. Han, Dun & Shao, Qi & Li, Dandan & Sun, Mei, 2020. "How the individuals’ risk aversion affect the epidemic spreading," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    6. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 0. "Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Feurer, Sven & Haws, Kelly L., 2022. "Justifiable justifications in sequential indulgent choice situations: A framework for future research based on perceived exceptionality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 630-639.
    8. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "Did You Invest Less Than Me? The Effect of Other’s Share of Investment on Psychological Ownership of Crowdfunding Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 2020. "Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1227-1249, December.
    10. Tiefenbeck, Verena & Staake, Thorsten & Roth, Kurt & Sachs, Olga, 2013. "For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 160-171.
    11. Mahmut Ozer & Matjaz Perc & Hayri Eren Suna, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Bias and the Amplification of Inequalities in the Labor Market," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 69(69), pages 159-168, June.
    12. Ehsan Nabavi & Chris Browne, 2023. "Leverage zones in Responsible AI: towards a systems thinking conceptualization," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Emma Dahlin, 2021. "Mind the gap! On the future of AI research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, December.
    14. Jean-Philippe Aguilar & Jan Korbel & Yuri Luchko, 2019. "Applications of the Fractional Diffusion Equation to Option Pricing and Risk Calculations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Shr, Yau-Huo (Jimmy) & Zhang, Wendong, 2024. "Omitted downstream attributes and the benefits of nutrient reductions: Implications for choice experiments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Filiptseva, Anna & Filler, Günther & Odening, Martin, 2022. "Compensation Options for Quarantine Costs in Plant Production," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329595, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    17. Doherty, Edel & Campbell, Danny, 2011. "Demand for improved food safety and quality: a cross-regional comparison," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108791, Agricultural Economics Society.
    18. Meißner, Martin & Oppewal, Harmen & Huber, Joel, 2020. "Surprising adaptivity to set size changes in multi-attribute repeated choice tasks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 163-175.
    19. Yizhao Jiang, 2022. "The Influence of Payment Method: Do Consumers Pay More with Mobile Payment?," Papers 2210.14631, arXiv.org.
    20. Chavez, Daniel & Palma, Marco, 2015. "Off the reservation: Pushing the bounds of rationality in experimental auctions," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 202164, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6912-:d:294260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.