IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v66y2021ics0160791x21001159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital workplace transformation in the financial service sector: Investigating the relationship between employees' expectations and intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Selimović, Jasmina
  • Pilav-Velić, Amila
  • Krndžija, Lamija

Abstract

Digital workplace transformation goes beyond the adoption or non-adoption of technologies – it has far deeper effects in the context of re-designing a workplace. Future digital work implies not only a change of tools used in work activities, but it also often changes the very nature of the working activities and processes. Psychological needs of employees are important in this context: the need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness which affect the employees' motivation to accept the future workplace. More specifically, if employees have expectations that digital environment will enable them to accomplish better performance, bigger satisfaction and personal well-being more easily, they will be more motivated to support digital transformation. Thus, in our study we aim to investigate whether employee involvement, well-being and support to digital work foster digital transformation of the workplace. In doing so, we close the existing gap in literature and confirm that interpersonal relatedness in digital work environment has a significant influence on employees' performance and well-being. This, in turn, increases employees’ intentions to support digital workplace transformation. We believe this study will help pre-digital organizations to rethink their strategies according to employee involvement to respond to the challenges of digital transformation. The study also encourages scholars to investigate whether and how those factors are shaped differently due to COVID-19 pandemic context.

Suggested Citation

  • Selimović, Jasmina & Pilav-Velić, Amila & Krndžija, Lamija, 2021. "Digital workplace transformation in the financial service sector: Investigating the relationship between employees' expectations and intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001159
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21001159
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Attaran & Sharmin Attaran & Diane Kirkland, 2019. "The Need for Digital Workplace: Increasing Workforce Productivity in the Information Age," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    3. Dittes, Sven & Richter, Shahper & Richter, Alexander & Smolnik, Stefan, 2019. "Toward the workplace of the future: How organizations can facilitate digital work," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 649-661.
    4. Schwarzmüller, Tanja & Brosi, Prisca & Duman, Denis & Welpe, Isabell M., 2018. "How Does the Digital Transformation Affect Organizations? Key Themes of Change in Work Design and Leadership," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 29(2), pages 114-138.
    5. Myriam Karoui & Aurélie Dudézert & Dorothy E. Leidner, 2015. "Strategies and symbolism in the adoption of organizational social networking systems," Post-Print hal-01340336, HAL.
    6. Anis Khedhaouria & Nassim Belbaly & Hind Benbya, 2014. "Exploring the impact of organizational climate factors on organizational creativity within a centralized IS," Post-Print hal-02047847, HAL.
    7. Jan Brocke & Wolfgang Maaß & Peter Buxmann & Alexander Maedche & Jan Marco Leimeister & Günter Pecht, 2018. "Future Work and Enterprise Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 357-366, August.
    8. Alexander Richter & Peter Heinrich & Alexander Stocker & Gerhard Schwabe, 2018. "Digital Work Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(3), pages 259-264, June.
    9. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    10. E. Fuller & W. Hemmerle, 1966. "Robustness of the maximum-likelihood estimation procedure in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(2), pages 255-266, June.
    11. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    12. Sara Kim & Rocky Peng Chen & Ke Zhang, 2016. "Anthropomorphized Helpers Undermine Autonomy and Enjoyment in Computer Games," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 282-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iqbal, Muhammad Zahid & Campbell, Abraham G., 2021. "From luxury to necessity: Progress of touchless interaction technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Fernández Fernández, José Luis & Camacho Ibáñez, Javier & Díaz de la Cruz, Cristina & Gil, Bernardo Villazán, 2021. "How can ‘orare et laborare’ guide the person-technology relationship during the Fourth Industrial Revolution?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Singh, Shiwangi & Sharma, Meenakshi & Dhir, Sanjay, 2021. "Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Turja, Tuuli & Särkikoski, Tuomo & Koistinen, Pertti & Melin, Harri, 2022. "Basic human needs and robotization: How to make deployment of robots worthwhile for everyone?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Zhai, Huayun & Yang, Min & Chan, Kam C., 2022. "Does digital transformation enhance a firm's performance? Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Alam, Gazi Mahabubul & Mazzoleni, Alberto, 2023. "Entrepreneurs as strategic transformation managers: Exploring micro-foundations of digital transformation in small and medium internationalisers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Iwanicz-Drozdowska Małgorzata & Cichowicz Ewa & Cicirko Marianna & Kawiński Marcin & Nowak Agnieszka K., 2023. "New technologies in the financial industry: Case of Poland," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 9(3), pages 98-123, October.
    9. Kolagar, Milad & Parida, Vinit & Sjödin, David, 2022. "Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 176-200.
    10. Zhuo-Ming Ren & Wen-Li Du & Xing-Zhang Wen, 2022. "The Psychological Effects of Digital Companies’ Employees during the Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic Extracted from Online Employee Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Srdana Taboroši & Jasmina Poštin & Edit Terek Stojanović & Jelena Rajković Avdija & Nemanja Berber & Milan Nikolić, 2023. "The Influence of Cultural and Personal Properties on Job Performances and Organizational Commitment in Teleworkers," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Puica Elena, 2023. "Improving Supply Chain Management with "Self-Transactional Materials". Proposal of a Case Study from Business Processes," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 2014-2024, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    2. Monideepa Tarafdar & Cary L Cooper & Jean‐françois Stich, 2018. "The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research," Post-Print hal-01689038, HAL.
    3. Patricia Tegtmeier & Corinna Weber & Sabine Sommer & Anita Tisch & Sascha Wischniewski, 2022. "Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-31, November.
    4. Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, 2019. "Is Employee Technological “Ill-Being” Missing from Corporate Responsibility? The Foucauldian Ethics of Ubiquitous IT Uses in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 339-361, December.
    5. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Dittes, Sven & Richter, Shahper & Richter, Alexander & Smolnik, Stefan, 2019. "Toward the workplace of the future: How organizations can facilitate digital work," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 649-661.
    7. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Fiona Niebuhr & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Monica Molino & Emanuela Ingusci & Fulvio Signore & Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Vincenzo Russo & Margherita Zito & Claudio G. Cortese, 2020. "Wellbeing Costs of Technology Use during Covid-19 Remote Working: An Investigation Using the Italian Translation of the Technostress Creators Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Shahper Richter & Alexander Richter, 2020. "Digital Nomads," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(1), pages 77-81, February.
    10. Thomas Bolli & Filippo Pusterla, 2022. "Decomposing the effects of digitalization on workers’ job satisfaction," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 263-300, June.
    11. Roman Beck & Jens Dibbern & Martin Wiener, 2022. "A Multi-Perspective Framework for Research on (Sustainable) Autonomous Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 265-273, June.
    12. René Riedl & Harald Kindermann & Andreas Auinger & Andrija Javor, 2012. "Technostress from a Neurobiological Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(2), pages 61-69, April.
    13. Woo Jin Lee & Inho Hwang, 2021. "Sustainable Information Security Behavior Management: An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Employees’ Voice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    15. Zahoor, Nadia & Zopiatis, Anastasios & Adomako, Samuel & Lamprinakos, Grigorios, 2023. "The micro-foundations of digitally transforming SMEs: How digital literacy and technology interact with managerial attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    16. You-Kyung Lee, 2021. "Impacts of Digital Technostress and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy on Fintech Usage Intention of Chinese Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    18. repec:hal:journl:hal-04671811 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    20. Zhang, Ke & Hou, Yuansi & Li, Gang, 2020. "Threat of infectious disease during an outbreak: Influence on tourists' emotional responses to disadvantaged price inequality," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    21. Nascimento, Lígia & Correia, Manuela Faia & Califf, Christopher B., 2024. "Towards a bright side of technostress in higher education teachers: Identifying several antecedents and outcomes of techno-eustress," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.