IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i10p3762-d819876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Two-Stage Biogas Desulfurization Process Using Cellular Concrete Filtration and an Anoxic Biotrickling Filter

Author

Listed:
  • Morgane Poser

    (Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, CNRS, Université Rennes, ISCR—UMR 6226, 35000 Rennes, France
    IMT Atlantique, CNRS, GEPEA, Nantes Université, UMR 6144, 44000 Nantes, France)

  • Luis Rodolfo Duarte E. Silva

    (Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, CNRS, Université Rennes, ISCR—UMR 6226, 35000 Rennes, France)

  • Pascal Peu

    (INRAe, 17, Avenue de Cucillé—CS 64427, 35044 Rennes, France)

  • Éric Dumont

    (IMT Atlantique, CNRS, GEPEA, Nantes Université, UMR 6144, 44000 Nantes, France)

  • Annabelle Couvert

    (Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, CNRS, Université Rennes, ISCR—UMR 6226, 35000 Rennes, France)

Abstract

A two-stage desulfurization process including an abiotic filtration using cellular concrete waste (first stage) and an anoxic biotrickling filter filling with an inoculated expanded schist material (second stage) was investigated to remove H 2 S in mimic biogas with limited O 2 amount (ranged from 0.5 to 0.8%). The two-stage process was able to satisfactorily remove H 2 S for all experimental conditions (RE > 97%; H 2 S concentration = 1500 mg m −3 ; total Empty Bed Residence Time (EBRT) = 200 s; removal capacity (RC) = 26 g m −3 h −1 ). Moreover, at a total EBRT = 360 s (i.e., 180 s for each stage), the H 2 S loading rate (LR) was almost treated by the bed of cellular concrete alone, indicating that abiotic filtration could be applied to satisfactorily remove H 2 S contained in the gas. According to the H 2 S concentration entering the biotrickling filter, the majority end-product was either elemental sulfur (S 0 ) or sulfate (SO 4 2− ). Thus, the ability of the abiotic filter to remove a significant part of H 2 S would avoid the clogging of the biotrickling filter due to the deposit of S 0 . Consequently, this two-stage desulfurization process is a promising technology for efficient and economical biogas cleaning adapted to biogas containing limited O 2 amounts, such as landfill biogas.

Suggested Citation

  • Morgane Poser & Luis Rodolfo Duarte E. Silva & Pascal Peu & Éric Dumont & Annabelle Couvert, 2022. "A Two-Stage Biogas Desulfurization Process Using Cellular Concrete Filtration and an Anoxic Biotrickling Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3762-:d:819876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhinav Choudhury & Timothy Shelford & Gary Felton & Curt Gooch & Stephanie Lansing, 2019. "Evaluation of Hydrogen Sulfide Scrubbing Systems for Anaerobic Digesters on Two U.S. Dairy Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Mulu, Elshaday & M'Arimi, Milton M. & Ramkat, Rose C., 2021. "A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Grzegorz Piechota & Bartłomiej Igliński, 2021. "Biomethane in Poland—Current Status, Potential, Perspective and Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Sulewski & Wiktor Ignaciuk & Magdalena Szymańska & Adam Wąs, 2023. "Development of the Biomethane Market in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.
    2. Tavera-Ruiz, C. & Martí-Herrero, J. & Mendieta, O. & Jaimes-Estévez, J. & Gauthier-Maradei, P. & Azimov, U. & Escalante, H. & Castro, L., 2023. "Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Bartłomiej Igliński & Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Urszula Kiełkowska & Mateusz Skrzatek & Artur Gajdos & Anas Zyadin & Karthikeyan Natarajan, 2022. "How to Meet the Green Deal Objectives—Is It Possible to Obtain 100% RES at the Regional Level in the EU?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Marek Cierpiał-Wolan & Bogdan Wierzbiński & Dariusz Twaróg, 2021. "The Use of the Local and Regional Potential in Building Energy Independence—Polish and Ukraine Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Lisiak-Zielińska, Marta & Jałoszyńska, Sylwia & Borowiak, Klaudia & Budka, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Perception of biogas plants: A public awareness and preference - A case study for the agricultural landscape," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Joanna Domagała, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Aspects of Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Adhirath Mandal & Haengmuk Cho & Bhupendra Singh Chauhan, 2021. "ANN Prediction of Performance and Emissions of CI Engine Using Biogas Flow Variation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. A. S. M. Younus Bhuiyan Sabbir & Chayan Kumer Saha & Rajesh Nandi & Md. Forid Uz Zaman & Md. Monjurul Alam & Shiplu Sarker, 2021. "Effects of Seasonal Temperature Variation on Slurry Temperature and Biogas Composition of a Commercial Fixed-Dome Anaerobic Digester Used in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Justyna Franc-Dąbrowska & Magdalena Mądra-Sawicka & Anna Milewska, 2021. "Energy Sector Risk and Cost of Capital Assessment—Companies and Investors Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Agnieszka Mazurek-Czarnecka & Ksymena Rosiek & Marcin Salamaga & Krzysztof Wąsowicz & Renata Żaba-Nieroda, 2022. "Study on Support Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Sources in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-38, June.
    11. Jiang, Danping & Ge, Xumeng & Lin, Long & Chen, Zhou & Zhang, Quanguo & Li, Yebo, 2023. "Biological conversion of methane to methanol at high H2S concentrations with an H2S-tolerant methanotrophic consortium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 475-484.
    12. Chipo Shonhiwa & Yolanda Mapantsela & Golden Makaka & Patrick Mukumba & Ngwarai Shambira, 2023. "Biogas Valorisation to Biomethane for Commercialisation in South Africa: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Dynamic analysis and investigation of the thermal transient effects in a CSTR reactor producing biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    14. Agnieszka Urbanowska & Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz & Christian Aragon-Briceño & Mateusz Wnukowski & Artur Pożarlik & Lukasz Niedzwiecki & Marcin Baranowski & Michał Czerep & Przemysław Seruga & Hali, 2021. "Cascade Membrane System for Separation of Water and Organics from Liquid By-Products of HTC of the Agricultural Digestate—Evaluation of Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Papurello, Davide & Silvestri, Silvia & Biasioli, Franco & Lombardi, Lidia, 2022. "Wood ash biomethane upgrading system: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 702-712.
    16. Becker, C.M. & Marder, M. & Junges, E. & Konrad, O., 2022. "Technologies for biogas desulfurization - An overview of recent studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2022. "Analysis of the Energy and Material Use of Manure as a Fertilizer or Substrate for Biogas Production during the Energy Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Joanna K. Huertas & Lawrence Quipuzco & Amro Hassanein & Stephanie Lansing, 2020. "Comparing Hydrogen Sulfide Removal Efficiency in a Field-Scale Digester Using Microaeration and Iron Filters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Piotr Gołasa & Marcin Wysokiński & Wioletta Bieńkowska-Gołasa & Piotr Gradziuk & Magdalena Golonko & Barbara Gradziuk & Agnieszka Siedlecka & Arkadiusz Gromada, 2021. "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture, with Particular Emphasis on Emissions from Energy Used," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Marcin Zieliński & Aleksandra Karczmarczyk & Marta Kisielewska & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Possibilities of Biogas Upgrading on a Bio-Waste Sorbent Derived from Anaerobic Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3762-:d:819876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.