IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v162y2016icp613-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selective separation of CO2 and CH4 for biogas upgrading on zeolite NaKA and SAPO-56

Author

Listed:
  • Bacsik, Zoltán
  • Cheung, Ocean
  • Vasiliev, Petr
  • Hedin, Niklas

Abstract

Several commercial and potential adsorbents were investigated for the separation of CO2 from CH4, which is relevant for the upgrading of raw biogas. The main focus of the paper was on the working capacities and selectivities of the adsorbents for a generic vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) process. Zeolites 4A and 13X had good estimated CO2-over-CH4 selectivities and reasonably high working capacities for the removal of CO2. A variant of zeolite A – |Na12−xKx|-LTA (with 1.8⩽x⩽3.2), had at least the same working capacity as zeolite 4A but with a significantly improved selectivity. Hence, the environmentally important “CH4 slip” can be minimized with this |Na12−xKx|-LTA sorbent. If a high working capacity for CO2 removal is the most important characteristic for a VSA process, then silicoaluminum phosphate, specifically SAPO-56, appeared to be the best candidate among the studied sorbents. In addition, SAPO-56 had a substantially high estimated CO2-over-CH4 selectivity with a value between ∼20 and 30.

Suggested Citation

  • Bacsik, Zoltán & Cheung, Ocean & Vasiliev, Petr & Hedin, Niklas, 2016. "Selective separation of CO2 and CH4 for biogas upgrading on zeolite NaKA and SAPO-56," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 613-621.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:162:y:2016:i:c:p:613-621
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915013458
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Anoop & Olsen, Stig Irving, 2011. "A critical review of biochemical conversion, sustainability and life cycle assessment of algal biofuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3548-3555.
    2. Luo, Gang & Wang, Wen & Angelidaki, Irini, 2014. "A new degassing membrane coupled upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor to achieve in-situ biogas upgrading and recovery of dissolved CH4 from the anaerobic effluent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 536-542.
    3. Zhang, Wanqin & Wei, Quanyuan & Wu, Shubiao & Qi, Dandan & Li, Wei & Zuo, Zhuang & Dong, Renjie, 2014. "Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 175-183.
    4. Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Kim, Sang Hun, 2013. "Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 61-72.
    5. Deng, Liangwei & Li, Yang & Chen, Ziai & Liu, Gangjin & Yang, Hongnan, 2014. "Separation of swine slurry into different concentration fractions and its influence on biogas fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 504-511.
    6. Meyer-Aurich, Andreas & Schattauer, Alexander & Hellebrand, Hans Jürgen & Klauss, Hilde & Plöchl, Matthias & Berg, Werner, 2012. "Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 277-284.
    7. Hamelin, Lorie & Naroznova, Irina & Wenzel, Henrik, 2014. "Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 774-782.
    8. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    9. Cheung, Ocean & Bacsik, Zoltán & Liu, Qingling & Mace, Amber & Hedin, Niklas, 2013. "Adsorption kinetics for CO2 on highly selective zeolites NaKA and nano-NaKA," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1326-1336.
    10. Browne, James D. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2013. "Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 170-177.
    11. Silvestre, G. & Illa, J. & Fernández, B. & Bonmatí, A., 2014. "Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease waste: Effect of long chain fatty acids in the methane yield and its dewatering properties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 87-94.
    12. Läntelä, J. & Rasi, S. & Lehtinen, J. & Rintala, J., 2012. "Landfill gas upgrading with pilot-scale water scrubber: Performance assessment with absorption water recycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 307-314.
    13. Steven M. Kuznicki & Valerie A. Bell & Sankar Nair & Hugh W. Hillhouse & Richard M. Jacubinas & Carola M. Braunbarth & Brian H. Toby & Michael Tsapatsis, 2001. "A titanosilicate molecular sieve with adjustable pores for size-selective adsorption of molecules," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6848), pages 720-724, August.
    14. Montanari, Tania & Finocchio, Elisabetta & Salvatore, Enrico & Garuti, Gilberto & Giordano, Andrea & Pistarino, Chiara & Busca, Guido, 2011. "CO2 separation and landfill biogas upgrading: A comparison of 4A and 13X zeolite adsorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 314-319.
    15. Ekstrand, Eva-Maria & Larsson, Madeleine & Truong, Xu-Bin & Cardell, Lina & Borgström, Ylva & Björn, Annika & Ejlertsson, Jörgen & Svensson, Bo H. & Nilsson, Fredrik & Karlsson, Anna, 2013. "Methane potentials of the Swedish pulp and paper industry – A screening of wastewater effluents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 507-517.
    16. Steven M. Kuznicki & Valerie A. Bell & Sankar Nair & Hugh W. Hillhouse & Richard M. Jacubinas & Carola M. Braunbarth & Brian H. Toby & Michael Tsapatsis, 2001. "Erratum: A titanosilicate molecular sieve with adjustable pores for size-selective adsorption of molecules," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6856), pages 652-652, October.
    17. Patrick Nugent & Youssef Belmabkhout & Stephen D. Burd & Amy J. Cairns & Ryan Luebke & Katherine Forrest & Tony Pham & Shengqian Ma & Brian Space & Lukasz Wojtas & Mohamed Eddaoudi & Michael J. Zaworo, 2013. "Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for CO2 separation," Nature, Nature, vol. 495(7439), pages 80-84, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Chunyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 437-447.
    2. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Yan, Cheng & Zhu, Liandong & Wang, Yanxin, 2016. "Photosynthetic CO2 uptake by microalgae for biogas upgrading and simultaneously biogas slurry decontamination by using of microalgae photobioreactor under various light wavelengths, light intensities,," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 9-18.
    4. Zhou, Kui & Chaemchuen, Somboon & Verpoort, Francis, 2017. "Alternative materials in technologies for Biogas upgrading via CO2 capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1414-1441.
    5. Chen, S.J. & Zhu, M. & Fu, Y. & Huang, Y.X. & Tao, Z.C. & Li, W.L., 2017. "Using 13X, LiX, and LiPdAgX zeolites for CO2 capture from post-combustion flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 87-98.
    6. Pengfei Guo & Yuejin Zhang & Yongjun Zhao, 2018. "Biocapture of CO 2 by Different Microalgal-Based Technologies for Biogas Upgrading and Simultaneous Biogas Slurry Purification under Various Light Intensities and Photoperiods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Cheng, Jun & Wang, Yali & Liu, Niu & Hou, Wen & Zhou, Junhu, 2020. "Enhanced CO2 selectivity of mixed matrix membranes with carbonized Zn/Co zeolitic imidazolate frameworks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Mulu, Elshaday & M'Arimi, Milton M. & Ramkat, Rose C., 2021. "A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    2. Koch, Konrad & Helmreich, Brigitte & Drewes, Jörg E., 2015. "Co-digestion of food waste in municipal wastewater treatment plants: Effect of different mixtures on methane yield and hydrolysis rate constant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 250-255.
    3. Elsamadony, M. & Tawfik, A. & Suzuki, M., 2015. "Surfactant-enhanced biohydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) via dry anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 272-282.
    4. Sarto, Sarto & Hildayati, Raudati & Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of chemical pretreatment using sulfuric acid on biogas production from water hyacinth and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 335-350.
    5. Mingke Yang & Huishan Wang & Julian Y. Zuo & Chun Deng & Bei Liu & Liya Chai & Kun Li & Han Xiao & Peng Xiao & Xiaohui Wang & Wan Chen & Xiaowan Peng & Yu Han & Zixuan Huang & Baocan Dong & Changyu Su, 2022. "Efficient separation of butane isomers via ZIF-8 slurry on laboratory- and pilot-scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Dandikas, Vasilis & Heuwinkel, Hauke & Lichti, Fabian & Eckl, Thomas & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Correlation between hydrolysis rate constant and chemical composition of energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-42.
    7. Yin, Yao & Liu, Ya-Juan & Meng, Shu-Juan & Kiran, Esra Uçkun & Liu, Yu, 2016. "Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1131-1137.
    8. Chen, S.J. & Zhu, M. & Fu, Y. & Huang, Y.X. & Tao, Z.C. & Li, W.L., 2017. "Using 13X, LiX, and LiPdAgX zeolites for CO2 capture from post-combustion flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 87-98.
    9. Siegrist, Armin & Bowman, Gillianne & Burg, Vanessa, 2022. "Energy generation potentials from agricultural residues: The influence of techno-spatial restrictions on biomethane, electricity, and heat production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    10. Maghanaki, M. Mohammadi & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Galogah, R. Janzadeh, 2013. "Potential of biogas production in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 702-714.
    11. Zarkadas, Ioannis S. & Sofikiti, Artemis S. & Voudrias, Evangelos A. & Pilidis, Georgios A., 2015. "Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of pasteurised food wastes and dairy cattle manure in batch and large volume laboratory digesters: Focussing on mixing ratios," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 432-440.
    12. Grosser, Anna, 2018. "Determination of methane potential of mixtures composed of sewage sludge, organic fraction of municipal waste and grease trap sludge using biochemical methane potential assays. A comparison of BMP tes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 488-499.
    13. Wang, Hanxi & Xu, Jianling & Sheng, Lianxi & Liu, Xuejun, 2018. "Effect of addition of biogas slurry for anaerobic fermentation of deer manure on biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 411-418.
    14. Anriansyah Renggaman & Hong Lim Choi & Sartika Indah Amalia Sudiarto & Andi Febrisiantosa & Dong Hyoen Ahn & Yong Wook Choung & Arumuganainar Suresh, 2021. "Biochemical Methane Potential of Swine Slaughter Waste, Swine Slurry, and Its Codigestion Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    16. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Jinhui & Nie, Yongfeng, 2016. "Enhanced nitrogen distribution and biomethanation of kitchen waste by thermal pre-treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 380-388.
    17. Li, Demao & Tang, Ruohao & Yu, Liang & Chen, Limei & Chen, Shulin & Xu, Song & Gao, Feng, 2020. "Effects of increasing organic loading rates on reactor performance and the methanogenic community in a new pilot upflow solid reactor for continuously processing food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 420-429.
    18. Usack, J.G. & Gerber Van Doren, L. & Posmanik, R. & Labatut, R.A. & Tester, J.W. & Angenent, L.T., 2018. "An evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion implementation on New York State dairy farms using an environmental and economic life-cycle framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 28-40.
    19. Xie, Yujiao & Ma, Chunyan & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2016. "Evaluation of imidazolium-based ionic liquids for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 69-81.
    20. Jensen, P.D. & Sullivan, T. & Carney, C. & Batstone, D.J., 2014. "Analysis of the potential to recover energy and nutrient resources from cattle slaughterhouses in Australia by employing anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 23-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:162:y:2016:i:c:p:613-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.