IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v159y2020icp195-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimisation of biomass-fired cogeneration plants using ORC technology

Author

Listed:
  • Świerzewski, Mateusz
  • Kalina, Jacek

Abstract

In this paper, the problem of optimal sizing of biomass-fired ORC combined heat and power (CHP) unit for existing coal-fired district heating (DH) plant is discussed. The study examines the influence of boundary conditions on the optimal design characteristics of the ORC CHP system within heating plant backfitting project. The optimisation task is solved for given site-specific technical, economic, ecological and legal constraints. The proposed methodology for synthesis of new technological structure takes into account long-term operational experience and results of measurements of a given reference plant. Although the methodology is general, the solution presented in the paper is relevant for Polish DH sector. The analysis considers country specific system of financial incentives for renewable energy projects as well as participation in electricity balancing market and European Trading System (ETS). Thermal energy storage is considered as a solution providing flexibility of CHP system operation. Influence of different electricity, biomass, coal and EUA (European Emission Allowance) prices on optimal size and structure of the cogeneration system is examined. The analysis revealed that economic optima are relatively flat and the range of ORC unit size, for which the value of objective function is close to the optimum is quite wide. Although Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) suggest slightly different size of the system, the recommended solutions are the ones with relatively long annual time of operation. The optimum size of ORC for a DH system of approximately 30 MW peak heating output is within the range of electric power of 1–2 MW. It was also found that although market prices and support instruments are nowadays different than at the time of commissioning of the reference plant, the size of the ORC unit is still close to the optimal value. Implementation of thermal energy storage (TES) in the form of hot water storage tank moves the optimal rated electric power of the ORC generator slightly towards higher values. On the other hand, only a small improvement of financial performance is gained by implementation of TES. Considerable improvement of economic performance has been reached after anticipated increase paths for electricity and EUA prices were introduced. In this case however, the recommended optimal size of the ORC CHP remained almost the same as in the case of constant prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Świerzewski, Mateusz & Kalina, Jacek, 2020. "Optimisation of biomass-fired cogeneration plants using ORC technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 195-214.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:159:y:2020:i:c:p:195-214
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120308600
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martelli, Emanuele & Capra, Federico & Consonni, Stefano, 2015. "Numerical optimization of Combined Heat and Power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part A: Design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 310-328.
    2. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    3. Taljan, Gregor & Verbič, Gregor & Pantoš, Miloš & Sakulin, Manfred & Fickert, Lothar, 2012. "Optimal sizing of biomass-fired Organic Rankine Cycle CHP system with heat storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 29-38.
    4. Kalina, Jacek & Świerzewski, Mateusz, 2019. "Identification of ORC unit operation in biomass-fired cogeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 400-414.
    5. Baños, R. & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. & Montoya, F.G. & Gil, C. & Alcayde, A. & Gómez, J., 2011. "Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1753-1766, May.
    6. Tańczuk, Mariusz & Ulbrich, Roman, 2013. "Implementation of a biomass-fired co-generation plant supplied with an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) as a heat source for small scale heat distribution system – A comparative analysis under Polish and G," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 132-141.
    7. Capra, Federico & Martelli, Emanuele, 2015. "Numerical optimization of combined heat and power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part B: Simultaneous design & part-load optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 329-343.
    8. Uris, María & Linares, José Ignacio & Arenas, Eva, 2015. "Size optimization of a biomass-fired cogeneration plant CHP/CCHP (Combined heat and power/Combined heat, cooling and power) based on Organic Rankine Cycle for a district network in Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 935-945.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xiaoya & Xu, Bin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Towards a novel holistic design of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems operating under heat source fluctuations and intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Yuhao Zhou & Jiongming Ruan & Guotong Hong & Zheng Miao, 2022. "Dynamic Modeling and Comparison Study of Control Strategies of a Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Parisa Heidarnejad & Hadi Genceli & Nasim Hashemian & Mustafa Asker & Mohammad Al-Rawi, 2024. "Biomass-Fueled Organic Rankine Cycles: State of the Art and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Schifflechner, Christopher & Kuhnert, Lara & Irrgang, Ludwig & Dawo, Fabian & Kaufmann, Florian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Geothermal trigeneration systems with Organic Rankine Cycles: Evaluation of different plant configurations considering part load behaviour," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 218-233.
    5. Lacrimioara Senila & Ioan Tenu & Petru Carlescu & Oana Raluca Corduneanu & Emanuel Petru Dumitrachi & Eniko Kovacs & Daniela Alexandra Scurtu & Oana Cadar & Anca Becze & Marin Senila & Marius Roman & , 2020. "Sustainable Biomass Pellets Production Using Vineyard Wastes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco L. & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2021. "Thermo-economic optimization of a novel hybrid renewable trigeneration plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 532-549.
    7. Chen, Heng & Wang, Yihan & Li, Jiarui & Xu, Gang & Lei, Jing & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    8. Feng, Yong-qiang & Zhang, Fei-yang & Xu, Jing-wei & He, Zhi-xia & Zhang, Qiang & Xu, Kang-jing, 2023. "Parametric analysis and multi-objective optimization of biomass-fired organic Rankine cycle system combined heat and power under three operation strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 431-449.
    9. Świerzewski, Mateusz & Kalina, Jacek & Musiał, Arkadiusz, 2021. "Techno-economic optimization of ORC system structure, size and working fluid within biomass-fired municipal cogeneration plant retrofitting project," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 281-296.
    10. Francesca Ceglia & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Maurizio Sasso & Guido Coletta & Luigi Pellegrino, 2022. "Biomass-Based Renewable Energy Community: Economic Analysis of a Real Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Miao, Zheng & Yan, Peiwei & Xiao, Meng & Zhang, Manzheng & Xu, Jinliang, 2023. "Comparative study on operating strategies of the organic Rankine cycle under transient heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Świerzewski, Mateusz & Kalina, Jacek & Musiał, Arkadiusz, 2021. "Techno-economic optimization of ORC system structure, size and working fluid within biomass-fired municipal cogeneration plant retrofitting project," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 281-296.
    2. Serafino, Aldo & Obert, Benoit & Vergé, Léa & Cinnella, Paola, 2020. "Robust optimization of an organic Rankine cycle for geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1120-1129.
    3. Da Lio, Luca & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2016. "Predicting the optimum design of single stage axial expanders in ORC systems: Is there a single efficiency map for different working fluids?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 44-58.
    4. Marty, Fabien & Serra, Sylvain & Sochard, Sabine & Reneaume, Jean-Michel, 2018. "Simultaneous optimization of the district heating network topology and the Organic Rankine Cycle sizing of a geothermal plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1060-1074.
    5. Dokl, Monika & Gomilšek, Rok & Čuček, Lidija & Abikoye, Ben & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2022. "Maximizing the power output and net present value of organic Rankine cycle: Application to aluminium industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    6. Meroni, Andrea & Andreasen, Jesper Graa & Persico, Giacomo & Haglind, Fredrik, 2018. "Optimization of organic Rankine cycle power systems considering multistage axial turbine design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 339-354.
    7. Chatzopoulou, Maria Anna & Simpson, Michael & Sapin, Paul & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Off-design optimisation of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) engines with piston expanders for medium-scale combined heat and power applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1211-1236.
    8. Pili, Roberto & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2019. "Simulation of Organic Rankine Cycle – Quasi-steady state vs dynamic approach for optimal economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 619-640.
    9. Martelli, Emanuele & Freschini, Marco & Zatti, Matteo, 2020. "Optimization of renewable energy subsidy and carbon tax for multi energy systems using bilevel programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    10. Xue, Xiaodi & Guo, Cong & Du, Xiaoze & Yang, Lijun & Yang, Yongping, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a two-stage organic Rankine cycle for liquefied natural gas cryogenic exergy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 778-787.
    11. Sakalis, George N. & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2018. "Intertemporal optimization of synthesis, design and operation of integrated energy systems of ships: General method and application on a system with Diesel main engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 991-1008.
    12. Hagen, Brede A.L. & Agromayor, Roberto & Nekså, Petter, 2021. "Equation-oriented methods for design optimization and performance analysis of radial inflow turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Zhang, Yonghao & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Reducing the operational fluctuation via splitting CO2 transcritical power cycle in engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    14. Astolfi, M. & La Diega, L. Noto & Romano, M.C. & Merlo, U. & Filippini, S. & Macchi, E., 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of a geothermal ORC with novel “Emeritus” heat rejection units in hot climates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2810-2821.
    15. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.
    16. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Tavano, Michele & Invernizzi, Costante Mario & Martelli, Emanuele, 2018. "Comparison of working fluids and cycle optimization for heat recovery ORCs from large internal combustion engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 396-416.
    17. Ondeck, Abigail & Edgar, Thomas F. & Baldea, Michael, 2017. "A multi-scale framework for simultaneous optimization of the design and operating strategy of residential CHP systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1495-1511.
    18. Intaniwet, Akarin & Chaiyat, Nattaporn, 2017. "Levelized electricity costing per carbon dioxide intensity of an organic Rankine cycle by using a water hyacinth-municipal solid waste fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 76-88.
    19. Zhang, Bo & Wang, Enhua & Meng, Fanxiao & Zhang, Fujun & Zhao, Changlu, 2020. "Prediction accuracy of thermodynamic properties using PC-SAFT for high-temperature organic Rankine cycle with siloxanes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Yari, Mortaza & Ariyanfar, Leyli & Aghdam, Ebrahim Abdi, 2018. "Analysis and performance assessment of a novel ORC based multi-generation system for power, distilled water and heat," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 262-281.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:159:y:2020:i:c:p:195-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.