IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v252y2022ics0360544222008970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing the operational fluctuation via splitting CO2 transcritical power cycle in engine waste heat recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ligeng
  • Tian, Hua
  • Shi, Lingfeng
  • Zhang, Yonghao
  • Shu, Gequn

Abstract

CO2 power cycle has been considered a promising technology to recover the engine waste heat at a fixed condition. Nevertheless, the large variation of engine conditions may bring about the operational fluctuation, which is reflected on the system performance deterioration. In this study, a splitting CO2 power cycle layout is proposed and optimized from the point of both design and off-design phases to match the large-fluctuated engine conditions. The mass flow through different heat exchangers can be adjusted when the engine heat sources are altered, which means that a higher system degree of freedom can be achieved. Results showed that the system operational fluctuation could be reduced effectively when the operation parameters were deviated from the design phase. Specifically, the total mass flow rate decreased apparently when the engine speed and torque decreased, whereas a moderate decrease was found in the splitting layout thanks to the flexible mass flow through each splitting branch. In addition, the deviation fluctuation of pressure ratio was also reduced especially at higher engine conditions. Average improvements of 12.2%, 17.5% and 8.5% in net generated power, exhaust utilization and exergy efficiency could be achieved, respectively. And the minimum brake specific fuel consumption could be improved by 5.5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Zhang, Yonghao & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Reducing the operational fluctuation via splitting CO2 transcritical power cycle in engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:252:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222008970
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222008970
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Ruiyuan & Su, Wen & Lin, Xinxing & Zhou, Naijun & Zhao, Li, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis and parametric optimization of a novel S–CO2 power cycle for the waste heat recovery of internal combustion engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    2. Martelli, Emanuele & Capra, Federico & Consonni, Stefano, 2015. "Numerical optimization of Combined Heat and Power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part A: Design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 310-328.
    3. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Liu, Peng & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Optimization of CO2 Transcritical Power Cycle (CTPC) for engine waste heat recovery based on split concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Mazzi, N. & Rech, S. & Lazzaretto, A., 2015. "Off-design dynamic model of a real Organic Rankine Cycle system fuelled by exhaust gases from industrial processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 537-551.
    5. Ma, Yuegeng & Morosuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Liu, Jiping, 2020. "Development and comparison of control schemes for the off-design operation of a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle with an intercooled main compressor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Ge, Y.T. & Li, L. & Luo, X. & Tassou, S.A., 2018. "Performance evaluation of a low-grade power generation system with CO2 transcritical power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 220-230.
    7. Liu, Peng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua, 2019. "How to approach optimal practical Organic Rankine cycle (OP-ORC) by configuration modification for diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 543-552.
    8. Capra, Federico & Martelli, Emanuele, 2015. "Numerical optimization of combined heat and power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part B: Simultaneous design & part-load optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 329-343.
    9. Shu, Gequn & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Deng, Shuai & Li, Xiaoya & Chang, Liwen, 2017. "Configurations selection maps of CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) for thermal energy management of engine waste heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 423-435.
    10. Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Paci, Marco, 2013. "An Organic Rankine Cycle off-design model for the search of the optimal control strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 97-106.
    11. Saidur, R. & Rezaei, M. & Muzammil, W.K. & Hassan, M.H. & Paria, S. & Hasanuzzaman, M., 2012. "Technologies to recover exhaust heat from internal combustion engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5649-5659.
    12. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Larsen, Ulrik & Pierobon, Leonardo & Haglind, Fredrik & Gabrielii, Cecilia, 2013. "Design and optimisation of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in marine applications using the principles of natural selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 803-812.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Lou, Juwei & Hu, Jianjun & Yao, Sen, 2023. "Thermodynamic, economic, environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling and power system for cascade utilization of engine waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Lu, Bowen & Zhang, Zhifu & Cai, Jinwen & Wang, Wei & Ju, Xueming & Xu, Yao & Lu, Xun & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2023. "Integrating engine thermal management into waste heat recovery under steady-state design and dynamic off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    4. Wang, Jingyu & Tian, Hua & Wang, Xuan & Li, Ligeng & Sun, Rui & Bian, Xingyan & Shu, Gequn & Liang, Xingyu, 2024. "Process design methodology for rankine cycle based on heat matching," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiaoya & Xu, Bin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Towards a novel holistic design of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems operating under heat source fluctuations and intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Xinxing Lin & Chonghui Chen & Aofang Yu & Likun Yin & Wen Su, 2021. "Performance Comparison of Advanced Transcritical Power Cycles with High-Temperature Working Fluids for the Engine Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    3. Pili, Roberto & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2019. "Simulation of Organic Rankine Cycle – Quasi-steady state vs dynamic approach for optimal economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 619-640.
    4. Serafino, Aldo & Obert, Benoit & Vergé, Léa & Cinnella, Paola, 2020. "Robust optimization of an organic Rankine cycle for geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1120-1129.
    5. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Tavano, Michele & Invernizzi, Costante Mario & Martelli, Emanuele, 2018. "Comparison of working fluids and cycle optimization for heat recovery ORCs from large internal combustion engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 396-416.
    6. Da Lio, Luca & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2016. "Predicting the optimum design of single stage axial expanders in ORC systems: Is there a single efficiency map for different working fluids?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 44-58.
    7. Meroni, Andrea & Andreasen, Jesper Graa & Persico, Giacomo & Haglind, Fredrik, 2018. "Optimization of organic Rankine cycle power systems considering multistage axial turbine design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 339-354.
    8. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Zhang, Hongguang & Yang, Fubin, 2017. "A regenerative supercritical-subcritical dual-loop organic Rankine cycle system for energy recovery from the waste heat of internal combustion engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 574-590.
    9. Chatzopoulou, Maria Anna & Simpson, Michael & Sapin, Paul & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Off-design optimisation of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) engines with piston expanders for medium-scale combined heat and power applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1211-1236.
    10. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Wang, Jingyu & Li, Min & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Adaptive flow assignment for CO2 transcritical power cycle (CTPC): An engine operational profile-based off-design study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    11. Luo, Xianglong & Wei, Youxing & Qiu, Guanfu & Liang, Yingzong & Chen, Jianyong & Yang, Zhi & Wang, Chao & Chen, Ying, 2020. "Simultaneous design and off-design operation optimization of a waste heat-driven organic Rankine cycle using a multi-period mathematical programming method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    12. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    13. Martelli, Emanuele & Freschini, Marco & Zatti, Matteo, 2020. "Optimization of renewable energy subsidy and carbon tax for multi energy systems using bilevel programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Xia, Xiaoxia & Liu, Zhipeng & Wang, Zhiqi & Sun, Tong & Zhang, Hualong & Zhang, Sifeng, 2023. "Thermo-economic-environmental optimization design of dual-loop organic Rankine cycle under fluctuating heat source temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Sakalis, George N. & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2018. "Intertemporal optimization of synthesis, design and operation of integrated energy systems of ships: General method and application on a system with Diesel main engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 991-1008.
    16. Hagen, Brede A.L. & Agromayor, Roberto & Nekså, Petter, 2021. "Equation-oriented methods for design optimization and performance analysis of radial inflow turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Liu, Peng & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Optimization of CO2 Transcritical Power Cycle (CTPC) for engine waste heat recovery based on split concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    18. Astolfi, M. & La Diega, L. Noto & Romano, M.C. & Merlo, U. & Filippini, S. & Macchi, E., 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of a geothermal ORC with novel “Emeritus” heat rejection units in hot climates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2810-2821.
    19. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.
    20. Larsen, Ulrik & Pierobon, Leonardo & Baldi, Francesco & Haglind, Fredrik & Ivarsson, Anders, 2015. "Development of a model for the prediction of the fuel consumption and nitrogen oxides emission trade-off for large ships," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 545-555.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:252:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222008970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.