IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v253y2025ics0951832024005490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of offshore wind turbine blade maintenance: RL-based and classical strategies for sustainable approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hendradewa, Andrie Pasca
  • Yin, Shen

Abstract

This study compares traditional methods like Corrective Maintenance (CM), Scheduled Maintenance (SM), and Condition-based Maintenance (CbM) with Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based offshore wind turbine (OWT) blade maintenance strategies. In order to address the dual challenge of minimizing carbon output while managing maintenance costs and operational efficiency, the study presents a mathematical model intended to estimate carbon emissions associated with OWT maintenance activities. The ability of the RL-based strategy to reduce the risk of fatigue failure in OWT blades and account for wind speed variability in maintenance schedule optimization is assessed. In order to provide a sustainable maintenance solution this strategy balances the trade-offs between economic profit and environmental effect. The findings demonstrate how RL can provide a balanced approach to maintenance that enhances both operational performance and environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hendradewa, Andrie Pasca & Yin, Shen, 2025. "Comparative analysis of offshore wind turbine blade maintenance: RL-based and classical strategies for sustainable approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:253:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024005490
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005490
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:253:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024005490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.