IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v72y2018icp116-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling land use change impacts on hydrology and the use of landscape metrics as tools for watershed management: The case of an ungauged catchment in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Boongaling, Cheamson Garret K.
  • Faustino-Eslava, Decibel V.
  • Lansigan, Felino P.

Abstract

The impacts of land use/land cover (LULC) change and the relationship between landscape pattern and hydrologic processes in the ungauged Calumpang watershed, Batangas, Philippines were studied. LULC change from 2003 to 2008 included an increase in built-up areas (69%) and a reduction of mixed vegetation including riparian vegetation (−10%), which have significant effects on hydrology. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), significant increases in surface runoff (5%) and sediment yield (6%) and a reduction in baseflow (−11%) were shown. Spatial and temporal variations of the impacts were observed: degraded sub-basins experienced increased streamflow (up to 31%) during stormy months and reduced baseflow (up to −26%) during dry months. In contrast, improved sub-basins decreased stormflow (up to −4%), and increased baseflow (up to 5%) during dry months. Nine landscape metrics known to affect hydrology were quantified using Fragstats and were correlated with surface runoff, baseflow and sediment yield using partial least square (PLS) regression. The results indicated that increasing patch density and largest patch index of agricultural and forested landscapes, respectively, leads to a decrease in surface runoff and sediment yield while increasing baseflow. In contrast, increasing cohesion and aggregation index of agricultural and forested landscapes, respectively, results to an increase in surface runoff and sediment yield as baseflow decreases. Although more observed data is needed for validation, the relationship model produced in this study can be applied to new data or used for scenario analysis. When coupled with economic, social and political assessments, the model serves as a useful tool in formulating comprehensive watershed management and land use policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Boongaling, Cheamson Garret K. & Faustino-Eslava, Decibel V. & Lansigan, Felino P., 2018. "Modeling land use change impacts on hydrology and the use of landscape metrics as tools for watershed management: The case of an ungauged catchment in the Philippines," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 116-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:116-128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483771630895X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panagopoulos, Y. & Makropoulos, C. & Baltas, E. & Mimikou, M., 2011. "SWAT parameterization for the identification of critical diffuse pollution source areas under data limitations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(19), pages 3500-3512.
    2. Hernandez, E.C. & Henderson, A. & Oliver, D.P., 2012. "Effects of changing land use in the Pagsanjan–Lumban catchment on suspended sediment loads to Laguna de Bay, Philippines," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 8-16.
    3. Casalí, J. & Giménez, R. & Díez, J. & Álvarez-Mozos, J. & Del Valle de Lersundi, J. & Goñi, M. & Campo, M.A. & Chahor, Y. & Gastesi, R. & López, J., 2010. "Sediment production and water quality of watersheds with contrasting land use in Navarre (Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1683-1694, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongfen Zhang & Nong Wang & Chongjun Tang & Shiqiang Zhang & Yuejun Song & Kaitao Liao & Xiaofei Nie, 2021. "A New Indicator to Better Represent the Impact of Landscape Pattern Change on Basin Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield in the Upper Reach of Ganjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Shanshan Hu & Yunyun Fan & Tao Zhang, 2020. "Assessing the Effect of Land Use Change on Surface Runoff in a Rapidly Urbanized City: A Case Study of the Central Area of Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Van den Berghe, Hanne & Gheyle, W. & Stichelbaut, B. & Van Meirvenne, M. & Bourgeois, J. & Van Eetvelde, V., 2020. "Understanding the landscape dynamics from a devastated to revived cultural landscape: The case of the First World War in Flanders through the lens of landscape patterns," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Masoomeh Yaghoobi & Alireza Vafaeenejad & Hamidreza Moradi & Hossein Hashemi, 2022. "Analysis of Landscape Composition and Configuration Based on LULC Change Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Chong Wei & Zhiqiang Zhang & Zhiguo Wang & Lianhai Cao & Yichang Wei & Xiangning Zhang & Rongqin Zhao & Liangang Xiao & Qing Wu, 2022. "Response of Variation of Water and Sediment to Landscape Pattern in the Dapoling Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Yongchao Liu & Yongxue Liu & Jialin Li & Wanyun Lu & Xianglin Wei & Chao Sun, 2018. "Evolution of Landscape Ecological Risk at the Optimal Scale: A Case Study of the Open Coastal Wetlands in Jiangsu, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Christian Mera-Parra & Fernando Oñate-Valdivieso & Priscilla Massa-Sánchez & Pablo Ochoa-Cueva, 2021. "Establishment of the Baseline for the IWRM in the Ecuadorian Andean Basins: Land Use Change, Water Recharge, Meteorological Forecast and Hydrological Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Mariusz Starzec & Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Daniel Słyś, 2023. "Assessment of the Feasibility of Implementing a Flash Flood Early Warning System in a Small Catchment Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-43, May.
    10. Vahid Moosavi & Ayoob Karami & Negin Behnia & Ronny Berndtsson & Christian Massari, 2022. "Linking Hydro-Physical Variables and Landscape Metrics using Advanced Data Mining for Stream-Flow Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(11), pages 4255-4273, September.
    11. Li-Chi Chiang & Yi-Ting Chuang & Chin-Chuan Han, 2019. "Integrating Landscape Metrics and Hydrologic Modeling to Assess the Impact of Natural Disturbances on Ecohydrological Processes in the Chenyulan Watershed, Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shan, Nan & Ruan, Xiao-Hong & Xu, Jing & Pan, Zha-Rong, 2014. "Estimating the optimal width of buffer strip for nonpoint source pollution control in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 276(C), pages 51-63.
    2. Ramesh P. Rudra & Balew A. Mekonnen & Rituraj Shukla & Narayan Kumar Shrestha & Pradeep K. Goel & Prasad Daggupati & Asim Biswas, 2020. "Currents Status, Challenges, and Future Directions in Identifying Critical Source Areas for Non-Point Source Pollution in Canadian Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Merchán, D. & Casalí, J. & Del Valle de Lersundi, J. & Campo-Bescós, M.A. & Giménez, R. & Preciado, B. & Lafarga, A., 2018. "Runoff, nutrients, sediment and salt yields in an irrigated watershed in southern Navarre (Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 120-132.
    4. Nareth Nut & Machito Mihara & Jaehak Jeong & Bunthan Ngo & Gilbert Sigua & P.V. Vara Prasad & Manny R. Reyes, 2021. "Land Use and Land Cover Changes and Its Impact on Soil Erosion in Stung Sangkae Catchment of Cambodia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Liu, Ruimin & Zhang, Peipei & Wang, Xiujuan & Chen, Yaxin & Shen, Zhenyao, 2013. "Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 9-18.
    6. Guangxing Ji & Zhizhu Lai & Haibin Xia & Hao Liu & Zheng Wang, 2021. "Future Runoff Variation and Flood Disaster Prediction of the Yellow River Basin Based on CA-Markov and SWAT," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Leh, Mansoor D.K. & Sharpley, Andrew N. & Singh, Gurdeep & Matlock, Marty D., 2018. "Assessing the impact of the MRBI program in a data limited Arkansas watershed using the SWAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 202-219.
    8. Jiayu Peng & Chunling Jin & Yue Wu & Zeying Hou & Sijia Gao & Zhaosheng Chu & Binghui Zheng, 2022. "Modeling Non-Point Source Nutrient Loads with Different Cropping Systems in an Agricultural Lake Watershed in Southwestern China: From Field to Watershed Scale," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Giménez, R. & Casalí, J. & Grande, I. & Díez, J. & Campo, M.A. & Álvarez-Mozos, J. & Goñi, M., 2012. "Factors controlling sediment export in a small agricultural watershed in Navarre (Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Zhang, Dejian & Chen, Xingwei & Yao, Huaxia & Lin, Bingqing, 2015. "Improved calibration scheme of SWAT by separating wet and dry seasons," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 54-61.
    11. Eren Germeç & Okan Ürker, 2023. "Investigation of a SWAT Model for Environmental Health Management Based on the Water Quality Parameters of a Stream System in Central Anatolia (Türkiye)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Zhang, Shanghong & Liu, Yan & Wang, Taiwei, 2014. "How land use change contributes to reducing soil erosion in the Jialing River Basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 65-73.
    13. Chahor, Y. & Casalí, J. & Giménez, R. & Bingner, R.L. & Campo, M.A. & Goñi, M., 2014. "Evaluation of the AnnAGNPS model for predicting runoff and sediment yield in a small Mediterranean agricultural watershed in Navarre (Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 24-37.
    14. Widodo Brontowiyono & Adelia Anju Asmara & Raudatun Jana & Andik Yulianto & Suphia Rahmawati, 2022. "Land-Use Impact on Water Quality of the Opak Sub-Watershed, Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Alam, Md Jahangir & Dutta, Dushmanta, 2012. "A process-based and distributed model for nutrient dynamics in river basin: Development, testing and applications," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 112-124.
    16. Pokhrel, Bijay & Paudel, Krishna P., 2014. "Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin (MARB)," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170699, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Jinjin Gu & Yuan Cao & Min Wu & Min Song & Lin Wang, 2022. "A Novel Method for Watershed Best Management Practices Spatial Optimal Layout under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Guanghui Li & Lei Chang & Haoye Li & Yuefen Li, 2023. "Modeling the Impact of Land Use Optimization on Non-Point Source Pollution: Evidence from Chinese Reservoir Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Velia Bigi & Alessandro Pezzoli & Elena Comino & Maurizio Rosso, 2020. "A Vulnerability Assessment in Scant Data Context: The Case of North Horr Sub-County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Niraula, Rewati & Kalin, Latif & Srivastava, Puneet & Anderson, Christopher J., 2013. "Identifying critical source areas of nonpoint source pollution with SWAT and GWLF," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 123-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:116-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.