IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea14/170699.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin (MARB)

Author

Listed:
  • Pokhrel, Bijay
  • Paudel, Krishna P.

Abstract

We conducted biophysical simulations using MAPSHED to determine the effects of adopting best management practices to reduce nutrients and sediment in a watershed dominated by row crop agriculture and poultry production. Reduction of three water pollutants nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment from adopting different BMPs are used in the cost reducing optimization model. We considered three weather scenarios (dry, normal and wet) and various levels of BMP parameter efficiencies. The nutrient management plan and vegetative buffer are the dominant cost-effective BMPs in the normal and wet weather conditions. In the dry weather scenario, vegetative buffer and stream-bank stabilization are the most cost effective BMPs. The cost of per kilogram of phosphorus reduction ranges from $10 to $40 depending on levels of desired phosphorus level reduction and efficiency parameters used in the model. It is costly to reduce phosphorus in a dry weather scenario perhaps because runoff is minimal and total costs associated with BMPs do not get distributed much on a per unit effluent basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Pokhrel, Bijay & Paudel, Krishna P., 2014. "Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin (MARB)," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170699, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170699
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.170699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/170699/files/AAEA%20paper%202014%20FINAL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.170699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shang, Xiao & Wang, Xinze & Zhang, Dalei & Chen, Weidong & Chen, Xuechu & Kong, Hainan, 2012. "An improved SWAT-based computational framework for identifying critical source areas for agricultural pollution at the lake basin scale," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1-10.
    2. Panagopoulos, Y. & Makropoulos, C. & Baltas, E. & Mimikou, M., 2011. "SWAT parameterization for the identification of critical diffuse pollution source areas under data limitations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(19), pages 3500-3512.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shan, Nan & Ruan, Xiao-Hong & Xu, Jing & Pan, Zha-Rong, 2014. "Estimating the optimal width of buffer strip for nonpoint source pollution control in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 276(C), pages 51-63.
    2. Ramesh P. Rudra & Balew A. Mekonnen & Rituraj Shukla & Narayan Kumar Shrestha & Pradeep K. Goel & Prasad Daggupati & Asim Biswas, 2020. "Currents Status, Challenges, and Future Directions in Identifying Critical Source Areas for Non-Point Source Pollution in Canadian Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Niraula, Rewati & Kalin, Latif & Srivastava, Puneet & Anderson, Christopher J., 2013. "Identifying critical source areas of nonpoint source pollution with SWAT and GWLF," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 123-133.
    4. Boongaling, Cheamson Garret K. & Faustino-Eslava, Decibel V. & Lansigan, Felino P., 2018. "Modeling land use change impacts on hydrology and the use of landscape metrics as tools for watershed management: The case of an ungauged catchment in the Philippines," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 116-128.
    5. Zhang, Dejian & Chen, Xingwei & Yao, Huaxia & Lin, Bingqing, 2015. "Improved calibration scheme of SWAT by separating wet and dry seasons," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 54-61.
    6. Eren Germeç & Okan Ürker, 2023. "Investigation of a SWAT Model for Environmental Health Management Based on the Water Quality Parameters of a Stream System in Central Anatolia (Türkiye)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Xuekai Chen & Guojian He & Xiaobo Liu & Bogen Li & Wenqi Peng & Fei Dong & Aiping Huang & Weijie Wang & Qiuyue Lian, 2021. "Sub-Watershed Parameter Transplantation Method for Non-Point Source Pollution Estimation in Complex Underlying Surface Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Alam, Md Jahangir & Dutta, Dushmanta, 2012. "A process-based and distributed model for nutrient dynamics in river basin: Development, testing and applications," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 112-124.
    9. Zou, Tingting & Meng, Fanlei & Zhou, Jichen & Ying, Hao & Liu, Xuejun & Hou, Yong & Zhao, Zhengxiong & Zhang, Fusuo & Xu, Wen, 2023. "Quantifying nitrogen and phosphorus losses from crop and livestock production and mitigation potentials in Erhai Lake Basin, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    10. Liu, Ruimin & Zhang, Peipei & Wang, Xiujuan & Chen, Yaxin & Shen, Zhenyao, 2013. "Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 9-18.
    11. Jinjin Gu & Yuan Cao & Min Wu & Min Song & Lin Wang, 2022. "A Novel Method for Watershed Best Management Practices Spatial Optimal Layout under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Guanghui Li & Lei Chang & Haoye Li & Yuefen Li, 2023. "Modeling the Impact of Land Use Optimization on Non-Point Source Pollution: Evidence from Chinese Reservoir Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Guangxing Ji & Zhizhu Lai & Haibin Xia & Hao Liu & Zheng Wang, 2021. "Future Runoff Variation and Flood Disaster Prediction of the Yellow River Basin Based on CA-Markov and SWAT," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Velia Bigi & Alessandro Pezzoli & Elena Comino & Maurizio Rosso, 2020. "A Vulnerability Assessment in Scant Data Context: The Case of North Horr Sub-County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-23, July.
    15. I. Boskidis & G. Gikas & G. Sylaios & V. Tsihrintzis, 2012. "Hydrologic and Water Quality Modeling of Lower Nestos River Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(10), pages 3023-3051, August.
    16. Leh, Mansoor D.K. & Sharpley, Andrew N. & Singh, Gurdeep & Matlock, Marty D., 2018. "Assessing the impact of the MRBI program in a data limited Arkansas watershed using the SWAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 202-219.
    17. Jiayu Peng & Chunling Jin & Yue Wu & Zeying Hou & Sijia Gao & Zhaosheng Chu & Binghui Zheng, 2022. "Modeling Non-Point Source Nutrient Loads with Different Cropping Systems in an Agricultural Lake Watershed in Southwestern China: From Field to Watershed Scale," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.