IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v142y2017icp58-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Team conflict dynamics: Implications of a dyadic view of conflict for team performance

Author

Listed:
  • Humphrey, Stephen E.
  • Aime, Federico
  • Cushenbery, Lily
  • Hill, Aaron D.
  • Fairchild, Joshua

Abstract

This paper endeavored to resolve some of the inconsistencies in the intrateam conflict literature by proposing both that conflict can be conceptualized asan expression of dyadic interactions and that the study of conflict requires a dynamic perspective. We propose that the presence of relationship conflict in even a single dyad within a team can hinder information exchange, whereas the level of information exchange in teams can unlock task conflict. We argue that task and relationship conflict, due to this unfolding process, shift from an initially significant positive relationship to a null relationship over time. We further propose that task conflict and dyadic task conflict asymmetry combine to produce high performance in the teams. Our study of 219 individuals organized in 458 dyads within 51 teams – studied over 8weeks during the development of an entrepreneurial venture – provided support for our theoretical model. Our theory and findings demonstrate that the connection between task and relationship conflict is more complex that previously proposed, with task and relationship conflict differentiating over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Humphrey, Stephen E. & Aime, Federico & Cushenbery, Lily & Hill, Aaron D. & Fairchild, Joshua, 2017. "Team conflict dynamics: Implications of a dyadic view of conflict for team performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 58-70.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:142:y:2017:i:c:p:58-70
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597816300772
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaron D. Hill & Federico Aime & Jason W. Ridge, 2017. "The performance implications of resource and pay dispersion: The case of Major League Baseball," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1935-1947, September.
    2. Beersma, Bianca & Hollenbeck, John R. & Conlon, Donald E. & Humphrey, Stephen E. & Moon, Henry & Ilgen, Daniel R., 2009. "Cutthroat cooperation: The effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 131-142, January.
    3. Morwitz, Vicki G & Johnson, Eric J & Schmittlein, David C, 1993. "Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(1), pages 46-61, June.
    4. Steven Postrel, 2002. "Islands of Shared Knowledge: Specialization and Mutual Understanding in Problem-Solving Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 303-320, June.
    5. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    6. Donald C. Hambrick & Stephen E. Humphrey & Abhinav Gupta, 2015. "Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 449-461, March.
    7. Caroline Haythornthwaite & Barry Wellman, 1998. "Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(12), pages 1101-1114.
    8. Sinha, Ruchi & Janardhanan, Niranjan S. & Greer, Lindred L. & Conlon, Donald E. & Edwards, Jeffery R., 2016. "Skewed task conflicts in teams: what happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88148, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Schulz-Hardt, Stefan & Jochims, Marc & Frey, Dieter, 2002. "Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 563-586, July.
    10. Karen A. Jehn & Lindred Greer & Sheen Levine & Gabriel Szulanski, 2008. "The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 465-495, November.
    11. Lisa Hope Pelled, 1996. "Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(6), pages 615-631, December.
    12. Ann C. Mooney & Patricia J. Holahan & Allen C. Amason, 2007. "Don't Take It Personally: Exploring Cognitive Conflict as a Mediator of Affective Conflict," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 733-758, July.
    13. Mary J. Waller & Naina Gupta & Robert C. Giambatista, 2004. "Effects of Adaptive Behaviors and Shared Mental Models on Control Crew Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1534-1544, November.
    14. Federico Aime & Scott Johnson & Jason W. Ridge & Aaron D. Hill, 2010. "The routine may be stable but the advantage is not: competitive implications of key employee mobility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 75-87, January.
    15. Aime, Federico & Meyer, Christopher J. & Humphrey, Stephen E., 2010. "Legitimacy of team rewards: Analyzing legitimacy as a condition for the effectiveness of team incentive designs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 60-66, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiunyan Wu & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2020. "A multilevel and dynamic model of intragroup conflict and decision making: application of agent-based modeling," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Brykman, Kyle M. & O'Neill, Thomas A., 2023. "How conflict expressions affect recipients’ conflict management behaviors," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elfi Baillien & Jeroen Camps & Anja Van den Broeck & Jeroen Stouten & Lode Godderis & Maarten Sercu & Hans De Witte, 2016. "An Eye for an Eye Will Make the Whole World Blind: Conflict Escalation into Workplace Bullying and the Role of Distributive Conflict Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 415-429, August.
    2. Tobias Schoenherr & Elliot Bendoly & Daniel G. Bachrach & Anthony C. Hood, 2017. "Task Interdependence Impacts on Reciprocity in IT Implementation Teams: Bringing Out the Worst in Us, or Driving Responsibility?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 667-685, April.
    3. Christian, Jessica Siegel & Christian, Michael S. & Pearsall, Matthew J. & Long, Erin C., 2017. "Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 62-89.
    4. Karin Jonnergård & Anna Stafsudd, 2011. "The making of active boards in Swedish public companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(1), pages 123-155, February.
    5. Massari, Giovanni F. & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Carbone, Giuseppe, 2019. "Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 343-355.
    6. Juan Pablo Diánez-González & Carmen Camelo-Ordaz, 2016. "How management team composition affects academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation: the mediating role of conflict," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 530-557, June.
    7. John‐Patrick Paraskevas & Stephanie Eckerd & Curtis M. Grimm, 2022. "Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(3), pages 3-22, July.
    8. Jongsoo Kim & Richard Makadok, 2023. "Unpacking the “O” in VRIO: The role of workflow interdependence in the loss and replacement of strategic human capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1453-1487, June.
    9. Amélie Thery & Michel Verstraeten, 2018. "Satisfaction and Perception of Conflict in Teams: Understanding their Relationship and the Importance of Interaction Types," Working Papers CEB 18-014, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Franke, Henrik & Foerstl, Kai, 2018. "Fostering integrated research on organizational politics and conflict in teams: A cross-phenomenal review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 593-607.
    11. Adi Katz & Dov Te’eni, 2007. "The Contingent Impact of Contextualization on Computer-Mediated Collaboration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 261-279, April.
    12. He, Vivianna Fang & von Krogh, Georg & Sirén, Charlotta & Gersdorf, Thomas, 2021. "Asymmetries between partners and the success of university-industry research collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    13. Vahtera, Pekka & Buckley, Peter & Aliyev, Murod, 2017. "Affective conflict and identification of knowledge sources in MNE teams," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 881-895.
    14. José L. Ballesteros-Rodríguez & Nieves L. Díaz-Díaz & Inmaculada Aguiar-Díaz & Petra De Saá-Pérez, 2020. "The Role of Leadership in the Management of Conflict and Knowledge Sharing in the Research Groups of a Spanish Public University," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-436, June.
    15. Kuriakose, Vijay & S, Sreejesh & Jose, Heerah, 2020. "Examining the Mechanisms Linking Work-Related Conflicts and Employee Well-Being: A Mediation Model," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 23(2), pages 260-282, November.
    16. Jekelle, Helen Elena, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Key Antecedents of Workforce Diversity on Job Performance in Nigeria," OSF Preprints ybja2, Center for Open Science.
    17. Carmen Camelo-Ordaz & Joaquín García-Cruz & Elena Sousa-Ginel, 2015. "The Influence of Top Management Team Conflict on Firm Innovativeness," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 957-980, November.
    18. Kerwin, Shannon & Walker, Matthew B. & Bopp, Trevor, 2017. "When faultlines are created: Exploring the conflict triggering process in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 252-260.
    19. De Clercq, Dirk & Belausteguigoitia, Imanol, 2017. "Overcoming the dark side of task conflict: Buffering roles of transformational leadership, tenacity, and passion for work," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 78-90.
    20. Schneegans, Tim, 2019. "Escaping the comfort zone: A three-level perspective on filtering effects and counter-measures," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-05, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Team; Group; Conflict; Dyad;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:142:y:2017:i:c:p:58-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.