IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v272y2023ics0360544223005121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Shi-guan
  • Zhou, Jia-le
  • Hu, Zhuang
  • Zhou, Xin-yue
  • Cai, Qi
  • Xie, Jin-heng
  • Wu, Yang-wen
  • Lu, Qiang

Abstract

Due to the shortage of fossil energy, pyrolysis has become a promising way for the thermal utilization of biomass resources, so as to partly replace fossil energy as well as achieve efficient resource usage. The site selection of the biomass pyrolysis (BP) project is an important task in the preliminary planning stage of the project. Moreover, since low-carbon development has become a common global goal at present, this paper proposes a decision-making framework from the low-carbon point of view for BP project site selection. Firstly, a complete site selection decision-making criteria system embracing the novel concept of low-carbon development is established for the first time, and the subjective and objective weighting method is integrated into the comprehensive integrated weighting method based on game theory. More importantly, a brand-new distance formula for the probabilistic linguistic term set is defined to measure the deviation between information, which uses expectation, variance and scale function to make the measurement more reasonable. Based on this, an improved TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multi-criteria decision making) method is proposed to more accurately determine the best option. Finally, taking Guangdong Province as an example, the best choice for site selection is obtained. This work can provide insightful theoretical basis for the site selection of BP projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223005121
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223005121
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Ke, Yiming & Chu, Han & Xu, Ruhang, 2019. "Location selection of seawater pumped hydro storage station in China based on multi-attribute decision making," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 410-425.
    2. Tan, Caixia & Yu, Min & Wang, Jing & Geng, Shiping & Niu, Dongxiao & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "Feasibility study on the construction of multi-energy complementary systems in rural areas—Eastern, central, and western parts of China are taken as examples," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran & Xindong Peng & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Abbas Mardani, 2020. "A Group Decision Framework for Renewable Energy Source Selection under Interval-Valued Probabilistic linguistic Term Set," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Liu, Zihan & Li, Pan & Chang, Chun & Wang, Xianhua & Song, Jiande & Fang, Shuqi & Pang, Shusheng, 2022. "Influence of metal chloride modified biochar on products characteristics from biomass catalytic pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Yunna Wu & Lei Qin & Chuanbo Xu & Shaoyu Ji, 2018. "Site Selection of Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Plant considering Public Satisfaction by an Extended VIKOR Method," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, November.
    7. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    8. Zhang, Lidong & Li, Jiao & Xu, Xiandong & Liu, Fengrui & Guo, Yuanjun & Yang, Zhile & Hu, Tianyu, 2023. "High spatial granularity residential heating load forecast based on Dendrite net model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Buyuan & Tao, Yao & Li, Xinying & Chu, Han & Liu, Fangtong, 2019. "Sustainability performance assessment of wind power coupling hydrogen storage projects using a hybrid evaluation technique based on interval type-2 fuzzy set," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1176-1190.
    10. Khan, Imran & Kabir, Zobaidul, 2020. "Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 320-333.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Wu, Yunna & Liao, Mingjuan & Hu, Mengyao & Lin, Jiawei & Zhou, Jianli & Zhang, Buyuan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2020. "A decision framework of low-speed wind farm projects in hilly areas based on DEMATEL-entropy-TODIM method from the sustainability perspective: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Liqi Yi & Tao Li & Xiangyi Wang & Gentana Ge & Ting Zhang, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility performance evaluation from the perspective of stakeholder heterogeneity based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated TOPSIS," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 918-935, July.
    6. Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2023. "Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    7. Jiang, Tieliu & Zhao, Yuze & Wang, Shengwen & Zhang, Lidong & Li, Guohao, 2024. "Aerodynamic characterization of a H-Darrieus wind turbine with a Drag-Disturbed Flow device installation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    9. Lin, Boqiang & Bega, François, 2021. "China's Belt & Road Initiative coal power cooperation: Transitioning toward low-carbon development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Shuxia Yang & Shengjiang Peng & Xianzhang Ling, 2021. "Discussion on the Feasibility of the Integration of Wind Power and Coal Chemical Industries for Hydrogen Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Wei Wang & Yanbin Li & Jinzhong Li & Yun Li, 2024. "Can pumped-storage power stations stimulate rural revitalization? Evidence from the four-party evolutionary game," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 595-645, July.
    12. Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda & Silva, Valter Bruno & Cardoso, João Sousa & Brito, Paulo S. & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2021. "A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 802-820.
    13. Roman Vavrek, 2024. "Spatial Interpretation of Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Case Study with a Decreasing Number of Criteria and Subjective Approach to Determining Their Importance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    14. T. Sivageerthi & Bathrinath Sankaranarayanan & Syed Mithun Ali & Ali AlArjani & Koppiahraj Karuppiah, 2022. "Modeling Challenges for Improving the Heat Rate Performance in a Thermal Power Plant: Implications for SDGs in Energy Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Victor Arruda Ferraz de Campos & Luís Carmo-Calado & Roberta Mota-Panizio & Vitor Matos & Valter Bruno Silva & Paulo S. Brito & Daniela F. L. Eusébio & Celso Eduardo Tuna & José Luz Silveira, 2023. "A Waste-to-Energy Technical Approach: Syngas–Biodiesel Blend for Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Jun Dong & Dongxue Wang & Dongran Liu & Palidan Ainiwaer & Linpeng Nie, 2019. "Operation Health Assessment of Power Market Based on Improved Matter-Element Extension Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Xixi Luo & Quanlong Liu & Xuefeng Song, 2023. "China's strategies for promoting differentiated urban resilience measurement from the social ecosystem perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 235-249, January.
    18. Vlasopoulos, Antonis & Malinauskaite, Jurgita & Żabnieńska-Góra, Alina & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Life cycle assessment of plastic waste and energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    19. Minpeng Xiong & Xiaowen Yang & Sisi Chen & Fulian Shi & Jiahai Yuan, 2019. "Environmental Stress Testing for China’s Overseas Coal Power Investment Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Gao, Jianwei & Wang, Yaping & Guo, Fengjia & Chen, Jiayi, 2024. "A two-stage decision framework for GIS-based site selection of wind-photovoltaic-hybrid energy storage project using LSGDM method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223005121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.