IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v211y2020ics0360544220316728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Chao
  • Ju, Yanbing
  • Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R.
  • Dong, Peiwu
  • Wang, Aihua

Abstract

The waste-to-energy (WTE) project can handle the expanding volume of municipal solid waste (MSW) and promote the development of the circular economy, effectively. To achieve sustainable MSW management, it is pivotal to select a promising WTE incineration plant site. Thus, this paper aims to propose a novel methodology for selecting the optimal WTE incineration plant site. A sustainable evaluation index system is constructed from the environment, economy, society, risk, and energy aspects. Evaluation criteria are articulated by mathematical models and hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set, respectively. Given interactional relations among criteria and computation efficiency, HFL-BWM-ANP (hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method-Analytic Network Process) is proposed to obtain criteria weights. The double parameters TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) approach is employed to rank alternative sites. The feasibility of the proposed methodology is illustrated by a numerical case. Triple sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are performed to demonstrate the robustness, effectiveness, and superiority of the proposed methodology. Some managerial insights are provided from multiple dimensions for investors and the government to implement the WTE incineration plant project.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:211:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220316728
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220316728
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salahi, Niloofar & Jafari, Mohsen A., 2016. "Energy-Performance as a driver for optimal production planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 88-100.
    2. Sui, Lili & Ju, Yang & Yang, Yongming & Yang, Yong & Li, Aishan, 2016. "A quantification method for shale fracability based on analytic hierarchy process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 637-645.
    3. Dastjerdi, B. & Strezov, V. & Kumar, R. & Behnia, M., 2019. "An evaluation of the potential of waste to energy technologies for residual solid waste in New South Wales, Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Alao, M.A. & Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Popoola, O.M., 2020. "Multi-criteria decision based waste to energy technology selection using entropy-weighted TOPSIS technique: The case study of Lagos, Nigeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Chauhan, Ranchan & Singh, Tej & Tiwari, Avinash & Patnaik, Amar & Thakur, N.S., 2017. "Hybrid entropy – TOPSIS approach for energy performance prioritization in a rectangular channel employing impinging air jets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 360-368.
    6. Yagmur, Levent, 2016. "Multi-criteria evaluation and priority analysis for localization equipment in a thermal power plant using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 476-482.
    7. Zhou, Hui & Meng, AiHong & Long, YanQiu & Li, QingHai & Zhang, YanGuo, 2014. "An overview of characteristics of municipal solid waste fuel in China: Physical, chemical composition and heating value," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 107-122.
    8. Tang, Yuanjun & Dong, Jun & Li, Guoneng & Zheng, Youqu & Chi, Yong & Nzihou, Ange & Weiss-Hortala, Elsa & Ye, Chao, 2020. "Environmental and exergetic life cycle assessment of incineration- and gasification-based waste to energy systems in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Hrabec, Dušan & Šomplák, Radovan & Nevrlý, Vlastimír & Viktorin, Adam & Pluháček, Michal & Popela, Pavel, 2020. "Sustainable waste-to-energy facility location: Influence of demand on energy sales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Wu, Yunna & Wang, Jing & Hu, Yong & Ke, Yiming & Li, Lingwenying, 2018. "An extended TODIM-PROMETHEE method for waste-to-energy plant site selection based on sustainability perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Wang, Zhenfeng & Xu, Guangyin & Lin, Ruojue & Wang, Heng & Ren, Jingzheng, 2019. "Energy performance contracting, risk factors, and policy implications: Identification and analysis of risks based on the best-worst network method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-13.
    12. Šomplák, Radovan & Nevrlý, Vlastimír & Smejkalová, Veronika & Šmídová, Zlata & Pavlas, Martin, 2019. "Bulky waste for energy recovery: Analysis of spatial distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 827-839.
    13. Song, Jinbo & Song, Danrong & Zhang, Xueqing & Sun, Yan, 2013. "Risk identification for PPP waste-to-energy incineration projects in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 953-962.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    15. Khan, Imran & Kabir, Zobaidul, 2020. "Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 320-333.
    16. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    17. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 200-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zi-Xin Zhang & Liang Wang & Ying-Ming Wang, 2022. "A Novel Early Warning Method for Handling Non-Homogeneous Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Bartosz Radomski & Tomasz Mróz, 2023. "Application of the Hybrid MCDM Method for Energy Modernisation of an Existing Public Building—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2023. "Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    4. Vilardi, Giorgio & Verdone, Nicola, 2022. "Exergy analysis of municipal solid waste incineration processes: The use of O2-enriched air and the oxy-combustion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    5. Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    7. Franco, David Gabriel de Barros & Steiner, Maria Teresinha Arns & Fernandes, Rafaela Pereira & Nascimento, Victor Fernandez, 2022. "Modeling municipal solid waste disposal consortia on a regional scale for present and future scenarios," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    8. Wójtowicz-Wróbel, Agnieszka & Kania, Olga & Kocewiak, Katarzyna & Wójtowicz, Ryszard & Dzierwa, Piotr & Trojan, Marcin, 2023. "Thermal-flow calculations for a thermal waste treatment plant and CFD modelling of the spread of gases in the context of urban structures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    9. Chen, Heng & Li, Jiarui & Li, Tongyu & Xu, Gang & Jin, Xi & Wang, Min & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    10. Vlasopoulos, Antonis & Malinauskaite, Jurgita & Żabnieńska-Góra, Alina & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Life cycle assessment of plastic waste and energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Liqi Yi & Tao Li & Xiangyi Wang & Gentana Ge & Ting Zhang, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility performance evaluation from the perspective of stakeholder heterogeneity based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated TOPSIS," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 918-935, July.
    12. Gao, Jing & Wang, Chao & Wang, Zhanwu & Lin, Jin & Zhang, Runkai & Wu, Xin & Xu, Guangyin & Wang, Zhenfeng, 2024. "Site selection decision for biomass cogeneration projects from a sustainable perspective: A case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Wu, Yunna & Liao, Mingjuan & Hu, Mengyao & Lin, Jiawei & Zhou, Jianli & Zhang, Buyuan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2020. "A decision framework of low-speed wind farm projects in hilly areas based on DEMATEL-entropy-TODIM method from the sustainability perspective: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Manuel Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Selection of Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Slum/Informal Settlements Using the PROMETHEE Technique: A Case Study of the Greater Karu Urban Area in Nigeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2023. "Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    5. Alao, Moshood Akanni & Popoola, Olawale M. & Ayodele, Temitope Rapheal, 2021. "Selection of waste-to-energy technology for distributed generation using IDOCRIW-Weighted TOPSIS method: A case study of the City of Johannesburg, South Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 162-183.
    6. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Gupta, Himanshu & Kunc, Martin, 2021. "Risks associated with the implementation of big data analytics in sustainable supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Gao, Jianwei & Guo, Fengjia & Ma, Zeyang & Huang, Xin & Li, Xiangzhen, 2020. "Multi-criteria group decision-making framework for offshore wind farm site selection based on the intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2022. "Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 136-148.
    10. Dan Cudjoe, 2023. "Energy-economics and environmental prospects of integrated waste-to-energy projects in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12597-12628, November.
    11. Agaton, Casper Boongaling & Guno, Charmaine Samala & Villanueva, Resy Ordona & Villanueva, Riza Ordona, 2020. "Economic analysis of waste-to-energy investment in the Philippines: A real options approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Du, Puliang & Chen, Zhong & Gong, Xiaomin, 2020. "Load response potential evaluation for distribution networks: A hybrid decision-making model with intuitionistic normal cloud and unknown weight information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Ramezani, Mohammad & Khazaei, Moein & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Sandoval-Correa, Alejandro & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Turquoise hydrogen and waste optimization: A Bi-objective closed-loop and sustainable supply chain model for a case in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Xu, Jiuping & Huang, Yidan & Shi, Yi & Li, Ruolan, 2022. "Reverse supply chain management approach for municipal solid waste with waste sorting subsidy policy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Kaytez, Fazıl, 2022. "Evaluation of priority strategies for the expansion of installed wind power capacity in Turkey using a fuzzy analytic network process analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1281-1293.
    17. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    18. Shahjadi Hisan Farjana & Olubukola Tokede & Mahmud Ashraf, 2023. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Waste Wood-to-Energy Recovery in Australia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Kobayashi, Yasunori & Ismail, Tamer M. & Kobori, Takahiro & Ding, Lu & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Araki, Kuniomi & Kanazawa, Kiryu & Takahashi, Fumitake, 2021. "Experimental investigation on the effect of electron injection into air for thermal decomposition of solid waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    20. Madjid Tavana & Akram Shaabani & Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga & Iman Raeesi Vanani, 2020. "A Review of Uncertain Decision-Making Methods in Energy Management Using Text Mining and Data Analytics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:211:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220316728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.