IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v263y2023ipes0360544222030092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology

Author

Listed:
  • Caferra, Rocco
  • D'Adamo, Idiano
  • Morone, Piergiuseppe

Abstract

Waste-to-energy (WtE) plants are pivotal for the circular economy and sustainable urban development. However, public acceptance is critical to their success, given widespread skepticism (often due to limited knowledge about the potential environmental and health risks). This work examines the public mindset, identifying factors that may explain the transition from opposition to strong support. It also explores how traditional technical analysis may be successfully integrated with social perspectives to improve policy effectiveness. To this end, an online survey was administered to a sample of 240 Italian consumers. Three groups are identified from survey data: (i) opponents, (ii) weak supporters, and (iii) strong supporters. Results show that perceived risk factors are central in explaining the difference between groups, with lower perceived health and environmental concerns associated with general support for the technology, and trust in local government management associated with strong (as compared to weak) support. Health, environmental, and safety/control concerns negatively affected willingness to pay. The main implications suggest that different perceptions exist for WtE given that they are a sustainable technology compared to landfill use but without compromising separate collection and more virtuous waste management practices. This social sustainable approach can be supported by policies that promote energizing waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2023. "Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pe:s0360544222030092
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222030092
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuanwang Sun & Xiaoling Ouyang & Xiaochun Meng, 2019. "Public acceptance towards waste-to-energy power plants: a new quantified assessment based on “willingness to pay”," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(14), pages 2459-2477, December.
    2. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Sara Russo-Garrido & Nicolas Merveille, 2020. "Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    4. Xueliang Yuan & Xiaohan Fan & Jiaxin Liang & Mengyue Liu & Yuqiang Teng & Qiao Ma & Qingsong Wang & Ruimin Mu & Jian Zuo, 2019. "Public Perception towards Waste-to-Energy as a Waste Management Strategy: A Case from Shandong, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Hu, Junfei & Chen, Huanyue & Zhou, Peng & Guo, Peng, 2022. "Optimal subsidy level for waste-to-energy investment considering flexibility and uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Shauhrat S. Chopra, 2022. "Leveraging Blockchain and Smart Contract Technologies to Overcome Circular Economy Implementation Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    7. van der Horst, Dan, 2007. "NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2705-2714, May.
    8. Malinauskaite, J. & Jouhara, H. & Czajczyńska, D. & Stanchev, P. & Katsou, E. & Rostkowski, P. & Thorne, R.J. & Colón, J. & Ponsá, S. & Al-Mansour, F. & Anguilano, L. & Krzyżyńska, R. & López, I.C. & , 2017. "Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2013-2044.
    9. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, 2020. "Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Zhang, Wenlong & Zhang, Juan & Ding, Yanming & Zhou, Ru & Mao, Shaohua, 2022. "The accuracy of multiple methods for estimating the reaction order of representative thermoplastic polymers waste for energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Kothari, Richa & Tyagi, V.V. & Pathak, Ashish, 2010. "Waste-to-energy: A way from renewable energy sources to sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3164-3170, December.
    12. Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda & Silva, Valter Bruno & Cardoso, João Sousa & Brito, Paulo S. & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2021. "A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 802-820.
    13. Dashti, Amir & Noushabadi, Abolfazl Sajadi & Asadi, Javad & Raji, Mojtaba & Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Mohammadi, Amir H., 2021. "Review of higher heating value of municipal solid waste based on analysis and smart modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Lam, Hon Loong & Ng, Wendy P.Q. & Ng, Rex T.L. & Ng, Ern Huay & Aziz, Mustafa K. Abdul & Ng, Denny K.S., 2013. "Green strategy for sustainable waste-to-energy supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 4-16.
    15. Wu, Yunna & Wang, Jing & Hu, Yong & Ke, Yiming & Li, Lingwenying, 2018. "An extended TODIM-PROMETHEE method for waste-to-energy plant site selection based on sustainability perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-16.
    16. Antonopoulos, I.-S. & Perkoulidis, G. & Logothetis, D. & Karkanias, C., 2014. "Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 149-159.
    17. Contreras, Francisco & Hanaki, Keisuke & Aramaki, Toshiya & Connors, Stephen, 2008. "Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 979-991.
    18. Pan, Peiyuan & Peng, Weike & Li, Jiarui & Chen, Heng & Xu, Gang & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Design and evaluation of a conceptual waste-to-energy approach integrating plasma waste gasification with coal-fired power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    19. Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan & Xue Liang & Elizabeth O’Callaghan & Huihwang Goh & Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman & Ram Avtar & Tutuk Djoko Kusworo, 2022. "Transformation of Solid Waste Management in China: Moving towards Sustainability through Digitalization-Based Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui & Chunqin Zhang & Bo Xia & Qing Chen & Martin Skitmore, 2021. "Effects of economic compensation on public acceptance of waste-to-energy incineration projects: an attribution theory perspective," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(9), pages 1515-1535, July.
    21. Foster, William & Azimov, Ulugbek & Gauthier-Maradei, Paola & Molano, Liliana Castro & Combrinck, Madeleine & Munoz, Jose & Esteves, Jaime Jaimes & Patino, Luis, 2021. "Waste-to-energy conversion technologies in the UK: Processes and barriers – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    22. Longsheng, Cheng & Ali Shah, Syed Ahsan & Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Ahmad, Munir & Ali, Sharafat, 2022. "An integrated SWOT-multi-criteria analysis of implementing sustainable waste-to-energy in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1438-1453.
    23. Kala, Kaveri & Bolia, Nomesh B. & Sushil,, 2020. "Waste management communication policy for effective citizen awareness," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 661-678.
    24. Achillas, Ch. & Vlachokostas, Ch. & Moussiopoulos, N. & Banias, G. & Kafetzopoulos, G. & Karagiannidis, A., 2011. "Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 857-863.
    25. Guanghui Hou & Tong Chen & Ke Ma & Zhiming Liao & Hongmei Xia & Tianzeng Yao, 2019. "Improving Social Acceptance of Waste-to-Energy Incinerators in China: Role of Place Attachment, Trust, and Fairness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    26. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, 2022. "Human Health and Ecosystem Quality Benefits with Life Cycle Assessment Due to Fungicides Elimination in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    27. Alao, M.A. & Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Popoola, O.M., 2020. "Multi-criteria decision based waste to energy technology selection using entropy-weighted TOPSIS technique: The case study of Lagos, Nigeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    28. Khan, Imran & Kabir, Zobaidul, 2020. "Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 320-333.
    29. Chen, Heng & Li, Jiarui & Li, Tongyu & Xu, Gang & Jin, Xi & Wang, Min & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    30. Massimiliano Agovino & Antonio Garofalo & Angela Mariani, 2018. "Institutional quality effects on separate waste collection: some evidence from Italian provinces," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(9), pages 1487-1510, July.
    31. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos & Loizidou, Maria, 2019. "Energy efficiency of waste-to-energy plants with a focus on the comparison and the constraints of the 3T method and the R1 formula," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 323-329.
    32. Teresa Domenech & Aiduan Borrion, 2022. "Embedding Circular Economy Principles into Urban Regeneration and Waste Management: Framework and Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    33. Chou, Shuo-Yan & Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Phan, Nguyen Ky Phuc, 2015. "Financial assessment of government subsidy policy on photovoltaic systems for industrial users: A case study in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 505-516.
    34. Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Anatoli Rontogianni & Myrto Zeneli & Panagiotis Grammelis & Olgu Birgi & Rainer Janssen & Benedetta Di Costanzo & Martijn Vis & Bas Davidis & Patrick Reumerman & Asier, 2024. "Charting the Course: Navigating Decarbonisation Pathways in Greece, Germany, The Netherlands, and Spain’s Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Rekha Guchhait & Biswajit Sarkar, 2023. "Increasing Growth of Renewable Energy: A State of Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Nuortimo, Kalle & Harkonen, Janne & Breznik, Kristijan, 2024. "Global, regional, and local acceptance of solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Gu, Tao & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2024. "How willing are residents to accept sustainable energy from food waste generated by anaerobic digestion projects?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Min & Liu, Yong & Cui, Caiyun & Xia, Bo & Ke, Yongjian & Skitmore, Martin, 2023. "Social acceptance of NIMBY facilities: A comparative study between public acceptance and the social license to operate analytical frameworks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Wójtowicz-Wróbel, Agnieszka & Kania, Olga & Kocewiak, Katarzyna & Wójtowicz, Ryszard & Dzierwa, Piotr & Trojan, Marcin, 2023. "Thermal-flow calculations for a thermal waste treatment plant and CFD modelling of the spread of gases in the context of urban structures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    4. Ramezani, Mohammad & Khazaei, Moein & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Sandoval-Correa, Alejandro & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Turquoise hydrogen and waste optimization: A Bi-objective closed-loop and sustainable supply chain model for a case in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Mancini, G. & Lombardi, L. & Luciano, A. & Bolzonella, D. & Viotti, P. & Fino, D., 2024. "A reduction in global impacts through a waste-wastewater-energy nexus: A life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    6. Vlasopoulos, Antonis & Malinauskaite, Jurgita & Żabnieńska-Góra, Alina & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Life cycle assessment of plastic waste and energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Manuel Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Selection of Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Slum/Informal Settlements Using the PROMETHEE Technique: A Case Study of the Greater Karu Urban Area in Nigeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Ferdoush, Md. Ruhul & Aziz, Ridwan Al & Karmaker, Chitra Lekha & Debnath, Binoy & Limon, Mohammad Hossain & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul, 2024. "Unraveling the challenges of waste-to-energy transition in emerging economies: Implications for sustainability," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    10. Strazzera, Elisabetta & Meleddu, Daniela & Atzori, Rossella, 2022. "A hybrid choice modelling approach to estimate the trade-off between perceived environmental risks and economic benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Mularski, Jakub & Ostrycharczyk, Michał & Czerep, Michał & Baranowski, Marcin & Mączka, Tadeusz & Sadowski, Krzysztof & Hulisz, Patryk, 2023. "Application of plasma burners for char combustion in a pulverized coal-fired (PC) boiler – Experimental and numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    12. Bolegenova, Saltanat & Askarova, Аliya & Georgiev, Aleksandar & Nugymanova, Aizhan & Maximov, Valeriy & Bolegenova, Symbat & Mamedov, Bolat, 2023. "The use of plasma technologies to optimize fuel combustion processes and reduce emissions of harmful substances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    13. Congbin Cheng & Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Muhammad Irshad & Ghadeer Alsanie & Yasser Khan & Ahmad Y. A. Bani Ahmad (Ayassrah) & Abdu Rahman Aleemi, 2023. "Impact of Green Process Innovation and Productivity on Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Wu, Yunna & Liao, Mingjuan & Hu, Mengyao & Lin, Jiawei & Zhou, Jianli & Zhang, Buyuan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2020. "A decision framework of low-speed wind farm projects in hilly areas based on DEMATEL-entropy-TODIM method from the sustainability perspective: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    15. Xu, Jiuping & Huang, Yidan & Shi, Yi & Li, Ruolan, 2022. "Reverse supply chain management approach for municipal solid waste with waste sorting subsidy policy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Munir, M.T. & Mohaddespour, Ahmad & Nasr, A.T. & Carter, Susan, 2021. "Municipal solid waste-to-energy processing for a circular economy in New Zealand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Shadbahr, Jalil & Ebadian, Mahmood & Gonzales-Calienes, Giovanna & Kannangara, Miyuru & Ahmadi, Leila & Bensebaa, Farid, 2022. "Impact of waste management and conversion technologies on cost and carbon footprint - Case studies in rural and urban cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    20. Atour Taghipour & Parvaneh Zeraati Foukolaei & Maryam Ghaedi & Moein Khazaei, 2023. "Sustainable Multi-Objective Models for Waste-to-Energy and Waste Separation Site Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pe:s0360544222030092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.