IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p1129-d502882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project

Author

Listed:
  • Huijia Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Weiguang Fan

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Guangyu Qin

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Zhenyu Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

With the increasing demand for clean and low-carbon energy, high proportion of renewable energy has been integrated into the receiving-end grid. The grid-side energy storage project can ensure the safe and stable operation of the grid, but it still faces many problems, such as high initial investment, difficult operation and maintenance, unclear profit model, lack of business mode. Therefore, it is of great significance to evaluate the comprehensive benefit of energy storage projects in order to guide the sustainable development of large-scale energy storage projects and power system. By studying the technical and economic characteristics of energy storage, this paper establishes a comprehensive evaluation system from four dimensions of energy efficiency, economic, social, and environmental benefit. Combined with typical business modes and determining the subdivision index system of different modes, the comprehensive benefit evaluation model of grid-side commercial storage project based on Fuzzy-Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach is established. Empirical analysis of a 100-megawatt storage project is carried out to evaluate the project benefits comprehensively, the potential problems of the market development and business mode of the grid-side large-scale storage project are discussed, and the future development orientation and suggestions are put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1129-:d:502882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting & Gao, Rui & Wu, Chenghao, 2021. "Portfolio planning of renewable energy with energy storage technologies for different applications from electricity grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Parwal, Arvind & Fregelius, Martin & Temiz, Irinia & Göteman, Malin & Oliveira, Janaina G. de & Boström, Cecilia & Leijon, Mats, 2018. "Energy management for a grid-connected wave energy park through a hybrid energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 399-411.
    3. Child, Michael & Kemfert, Claudia & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 139, pages 80-101.
    4. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Reino-Rio, Cipriano & Borge-Diez, David & Collado-Fernández, Eduardo, 2016. "Distributed generation: A review of factors that can contribute most to achieve a scenario of DG units embedded in the new distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1130-1148.
    5. Wang, Meng & Niu, Dongxiao, 2019. "Research on project post-evaluation of wind power based on improved ANP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of trapezoid subordinate function improved by interval number," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 255-265.
    6. Conlon, Terence & Waite, Michael & Modi, Vijay, 2019. "Assessing new transmission and energy storage in achieving increasing renewable generation targets in a regional grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1085-1098.
    7. Ding, Jie & Xu, Yujie & Chen, Haisheng & Sun, Wenwen & Hu, Shan & Sun, Shuang, 2019. "Value and economic estimation model for grid-scale energy storage in monopoly power markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 986-1002.
    8. Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Panda, Deepak Kumar & Das, Saptarshi, 2021. "Economic operational analytics for energy storage placement at different grid locations and contingency scenarios with stochastic wind profiles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Liu, Yuanxin & Zheng, Ruijin & Chen, Sisi & Yuan, Jiahai, 2019. "The economy of wind-integrated-energy-storage projects in China's upcoming power market: A real options approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Saboori, Hedayat & Hemmati, Reza & Ghiasi, Seyyed Mohammad Sadegh & Dehghan, Shahab, 2017. "Energy storage planning in electric power distribution networks – A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1108-1121.
    12. Ghadi, M. Jabbari & Ghavidel, Sahand & Rajabi, Amin & Azizivahed, Ali & Li, Li & Zhang, Jiangfeng, 2019. "A review on economic and technical operation of active distribution systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 38-53.
    13. Escalera, Alberto & Hayes, Barry & Prodanović, Milan, 2018. "A survey of reliability assessment techniques for modern distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 344-357.
    14. Wu, Wei & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Application value of energy storage in power grid: A special case of China electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1191-1199.
    15. Sidhu, Arjan S. & Pollitt, Michael G. & Anaya, Karim L., 2018. "A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 881-894.
    16. Sheha, Moataz & Mohammadi, Kasra & Powell, Kody, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of the impact of dynamic electricity prices on solar penetration in a smart grid environment with distributed energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    17. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Zhendong & Li, Lingfei & Ji, Pengli & Zhou, Qing & Zhang, Zhongliang, 2021. "Sustainable development evaluation on wind power compressed air energy storage projects based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1189.
    18. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Buyuan & Tao, Yao & Li, Xinying & Chu, Han & Liu, Fangtong, 2019. "Sustainability performance assessment of wind power coupling hydrogen storage projects using a hybrid evaluation technique based on interval type-2 fuzzy set," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1176-1190.
    19. Ramteen Sioshansi & Paul Denholm & Thomas Jenkin, 2012. "Market and Policy Barriers to Deployment of Energy Storage," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tian, Yuanyuan & Bai, Libiao & Wei, Lan & Zheng, Kanyin & Zhou, Xinyu, 2022. "Modeling for project portfolio benefit prediction via a GA-BP neural network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Yudong Tan & Guosheng Xie & Yunhao Xiao & Yi Luo & Xintao Xie & Ming Wen, 2022. "Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Hybrid Pumped-Storage Power Stations Based on Improved Rank Correlation-Entropy Weight Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Bing Wang & Lu Li & Kailei Deng & Haotian Ge & Hanchen Liu, 2022. "Structure Optimization of Academic Disciplines for Universities Featuring Energy under the Roadmap towards Carbon Neutrality: Results from a Hybrid Fuzzy-Based Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Faridul Islam & Aviral Kumar Tiwari & Wing-Keung Wong, 2021. "Editorial and Ideas for Research Using Mathematical and Statistical Models for Energy with Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-4, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Y.J. & Liang, X.Y. & Huang, T. & Lin, Z.W. & Li, Z.X. & Hossain, Mohammad Farhad, 2021. "A hierarchical framework for renewable energy sources consumption promotion among microgrids through two-layer electricity prices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Shen, Boyang & Chen, Yu & Li, Chuanyue & Wang, Sheng & Chen, Xiaoyuan, 2021. "Superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL): Experiment and the simulation from finite-element method (FEM) to power/energy system software," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Biancardi, Andrea & Mendes, Carla & Staffell, Iain, 2024. "Battery electricity storage as both a complement and substitute for cross-border interconnection," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    6. Grochowicz, Aleksander & Benth, Fred Espen & Zeyringer, Marianne, 2024. "Spatio-temporal smoothing and dynamics of different electricity flexibility options for highly renewable energy systems—Case study for Norway," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    7. Javier L'opez Prol & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2020. "The Economics of Variable Renewables and Electricity Storage," Papers 2012.15371, arXiv.org.
    8. Jafari, Mehdi & Botterud, Audun & Sakti, Apurba, 2022. "Decarbonizing power systems: A critical review of the role of energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Liqi Yi & Tao Li & Xiangyi Wang & Gentana Ge & Ting Zhang, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility performance evaluation from the perspective of stakeholder heterogeneity based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated TOPSIS," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 918-935, July.
    10. Ma, Mingtao & Huang, Huijun & Song, Xiaoling & Peña-Mora, Feniosky & Zhang, Zhe & Chen, Jie, 2022. "Optimal sizing and operations of shared energy storage systems in distribution networks: A bi-level programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    11. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Bączkiewicz, Aleksandra & Sałabun, Wojciech, 2022. "New multi-criteria method for evaluation of sustainable RES management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    12. Apostolou, Dimitrios, 2020. "Optimisation of a hydrogen production – storage – re-powering system participating in electricity and transportation markets. A case study for Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    15. Moradi-Sepahvand, Mojtaba & Amraee, Turaj, 2021. "Integrated expansion planning of electric energy generation, transmission, and storage for handling high shares of wind and solar power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    16. Lechón, Y. & de la Rúa, C. & Rodríguez, I. & Caldés, N., 2019. "Socioeconomic implications of biofuels deployment through an Input-Output approach. A case study in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 178-191.
    17. Ernest Igbineweka & Sunetra Chowdhury, 2024. "Application of Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform in Islanding Detection for a Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid with Multiple Distributed Generators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-33, October.
    18. Jiao, P.H. & Chen, J.J. & Cai, X. & Wang, L.L. & Zhao, Y.L. & Zhang, X.H. & Chen, W.G., 2021. "Joint active and reactive for allocation of renewable energy and energy storage under uncertain coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    19. Firouzmakan, Pouya & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Bornapour, Mosayeb & Khodabakhshian, Amin, 2019. "A comprehensive stochastic energy management system of micro-CHP units, renewable energy sources and storage systems in microgrids considering demand response programs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 355-368.
    20. Shuxia Yang & Shengjiang Peng & Xianzhang Ling, 2021. "Discussion on the Feasibility of the Integration of Wind Power and Coal Chemical Industries for Hydrogen Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1129-:d:502882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.