IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v367y2024ics0306261924007323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doublet huff and puff: A new technology for efficient geological CO2 sequestration and stable geothermal recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Gudala, Manojkumar
  • Yan, Bicheng
  • Tariq, Zeeshan
  • Zhang, Fengshou
  • Sun, Shuyu

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emission into the atmosphere has been increasing due to the increased energy demand worldwide, significantly contributing to global warming. Therefore, capturing and permanently storing CO2 while developing renewable energy is crucial. Geothermal energy is clean and renewable and essential for decarbonizing the energy sector. This study develops a novel doublet huff-and-puff (DHP) technology for geothermal development to store super-critical CO2 (SC-CO2) and extract geothermal energy. Inspired by the huff-and-puff technology of the petroleum industry, DHP adopts a pair of wells with upper and lower perforations implemented in both, and inflow control valves (ICV) control the status of the perforations and the injection and production operating cycles. To investigate the energy recovery and storage capacity of SC-CO2 in geothermal reservoirs, we use a thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) model to study DHP and compare it with the existing CO2 plume geothermal (CPG). The simulation results reveal that, in DHP, the produced fluid temperature after 40 years of production decreases only by 15.67% of the initial reservoir temperature (T0), whereas that in CPG decreases by an average of 26.87% of T0. Regarding the recovered energy, DHP can deliver an average of 78.83% more net heat energy than CPG. Moreover, DHP has no CO2 breakthrough for 40 years, whereas the CPG experiences a CO2 plume establishment with a breakthrough in the first 2.96 years. Further, we conduct a Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) analysis, finding that DHP decreases by an average of 21.23% compared to CPG. Therefore, DHP has at least three advantages compared to CPG: (1) DHP has a higher produced fluid temperature and recovered energy than CPG; (2) DHP has a more stable migration of the cold SC-CO2 plume without CO2 breakthrough in production than that in CPG; (3) DHP is more economical than CPG. The proposed DHP is a promising technology to produce geothermal energy efficiently and store store CO2 effectively in the subsurface.

Suggested Citation

  • Gudala, Manojkumar & Yan, Bicheng & Tariq, Zeeshan & Zhang, Fengshou & Sun, Shuyu, 2024. "Doublet huff and puff: A new technology for efficient geological CO2 sequestration and stable geothermal recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:367:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924007323
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924007323
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esteves, Ana Filipa & Santos, Francisca Maria & Magalhães Pires, José Carlos, 2019. "Carbon dioxide as geothermal working fluid: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    3. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Saeid, Sanaz & Doonechaly, Nima Gholizadeh, 2021. "The fault plane as the main fluid pathway: Geothermal field development options under subsurface and operational uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 927-946.
    4. Aliyu, Musa D. & Finkbeiner, Thomas & Chen, Hua-Peng & Archer, Rosalind A., 2023. "A three-dimensional investigation of the thermoelastic effect in an enhanced geothermal system reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    5. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Rui, Zhenhua & Ezekiel, Justin & Zhang, Liang & Wang, Hongsheng, 2018. "The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 49-63.
    6. Md Jamilur Rahman & Manzar Fawad & Nazmul Haque Mondol, 2022. "Influence of Rock Properties on Structural Failure Probability—Caprock Shale Examples from the Horda Platform, Offshore Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Liu, Guihong & Pu, Hai & Zhao, Zhihong & Liu, Yanguang, 2019. "Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling on well pairs in heterogeneous porous geothermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 631-653.
    8. Norouzi, Amir Mohammad & Pouranian, Fatemeh & Rabbani, Arash & Fowler, Neil & Gluyas, Jon & Niasar, Vahid & Ezekiel, Justin & Babaei, Masoud, 2023. "CO2-plume geothermal: Power net generation from 3D fluvial aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    9. Aliyu, Musa D. & Archer, Rosalind A., 2021. "Numerical simulation of multifracture HDR geothermal reservoirs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 541-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsieh, Jui-Ching & Li, Bo-Han & Lee, Bo-Heng & Royandi, Muhamad Aditya & Salsabilla, Nadya Sefira, 2024. "Performance and economic analyses of a geothermal reservoir model coupled with a flash–binary cycle model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Norouzi, Amir Mohammad & Pouranian, Fatemeh & Rabbani, Arash & Fowler, Neil & Gluyas, Jon & Niasar, Vahid & Ezekiel, Justin & Babaei, Masoud, 2023. "CO2-plume geothermal: Power net generation from 3D fluvial aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    3. Schifflechner, Christopher & de Reus, Jasper & Schuster, Sebastian & Corpancho Villasana, Andreas & Brillert, Dieter & Saar, Martin O. & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2024. "Paving the way for CO2-Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems: A perspective on the CO2 surface equipment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    4. Li, Jiawei & Yuan, Wanju & Zhang, Yin & Cherubini, Claudia & Scheuermann, Alexander & Galindo Torres, Sergio Andres & Li, Ling, 2020. "Numerical investigations of CO2 and N2 miscible flow as the working fluid in enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Wang, Yang & Li, Tuo & Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei, 2019. "Numerical analysis of heat mining and geological carbon sequestration in supercritical CO2 circulating enhanced geothermal systems inlayed with complex discrete fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 92-108.
    6. Xiao, Caiyun & Ni, Hongjian & Shi, Xian, 2022. "Unsteady model for wellbore pressure transmission of carbon dioxide fracturing considering limited-flow outlet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    7. Asongu, Simplice A & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2019. "Governance,CO2 emissions and inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 25253, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    8. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Tiankui & Qu, Zhanqing & Wang, Jiwei & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Numerical simulation of fracture propagation and production performance in a fractured geothermal reservoir using a 2D FEM-based THMD coupling model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    9. Al Saedi, A.Q. & Sharma, P. & Kabir, C.S., 2021. "A novel cyclical wellbore-fluid circulation strategy for extracting geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Yu, Ruyang & Zhang, Kai & Ramasubramanian, Brindha & Jiang, Shu & Ramakrishna, Seeram & Tang, Yuhang, 2024. "Ensemble learning for predicting average thermal extraction load of a hydrothermal geothermal field: A case study in Guanzhong Basin, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    11. Liu, Jun & Zhao, Peng & Peng, Jiao & Xian, Hongyu, 2024. "Insight into the investigation of heat extraction performance affected by natural fractures in enhanced geothermal system (EGS) with THM multiphysical field model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Saeed Mahmoodpour & Mrityunjay Singh & Ramin Mahyapour & Sri Kalyan Tangirala & Kristian Bär & Ingo Sass, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Processes at Soultz-sous-Forêts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Cao, Meng & Sharma, Mukul M., 2023. "Effect of fracture geometry, topology and connectivity on energy recovery from enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Scholten, Tjardo & Hooghiem, Joram & De Persis, Claudio & Herber, Rien, 2017. "Geochemical implications of production and storage control by coupling a direct-use geothermal system with heat networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 254-270.
    15. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Rui, Zhenhua & Ezekiel, Justin & Zhang, Liang & Wang, Hongsheng, 2018. "The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 49-63.
    16. Guo, Tiankui & Zhang, Yuelong & He, Jiayuan & Gong, Facheng & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2021. "Research on geothermal development model of abandoned high temperature oil reservoir in North China oilfield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-12.
    17. Schifflechner, Christopher & Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1292-1302.
    18. Asongu, Simplice A & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2019. "Enhancing governance for environmental sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 26282, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    19. Shu, Biao & Zhu, Runjun & Elsworth, Derek & Dick, Jeffrey & Liu, Shun & Tan, Jingqiang & Zhang, Shaohe, 2020. "Effect of temperature and confining pressure on the evolution of hydraulic and heat transfer properties of geothermal fracture in granite," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    20. Xiao Liu & Feng Zhang & Shuailiang Song & Xianfeng Tan & Guanhong Feng, 2024. "The Feasibility of Heat Extraction Using CO 2 in the Carbonate Reservoir in Shandong Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:367:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924007323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.