IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v227y2018icp49-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system

Author

Listed:
  • Cui, Guodong
  • Ren, Shaoran
  • Rui, Zhenhua
  • Ezekiel, Justin
  • Zhang, Liang
  • Wang, Hongsheng

Abstract

The ubiquitous natural sedimentary reservoirs and their high permeability have made the CO2 plume geothermal system increasingly attractive. However, the complicated fluid-rock interactions during the geothermal exploitation can cause severe reservoir damage, constraining the excellent heat mining performance of the CO2 and decreasing the possible applications of the CO2 plume geothermal system. In order to analyze and solve this energy issue affecting the geothermal exploitation, in this study, a comprehensive numerical simulation model was established, which can consider formation water evaporation, salt precipitation, CO2-water-rock geochemical reactions, and the changes in reservoir porosity and permeability in the CO2 plume geothermal (CPG) system. Using this model, the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation and their effects on the geothermal exploitation were analyzed, and some measures were proposed to reduce the influence of fluid-rock interactions on the heat mining rate. The simulation results show that the gravity and the negative gas-liquid capillary pressure gradient induced by evaporation can cause the formation water to flow toward the injector. The back flow of the formation water results in salt precipitation accumulation in the injection well region, which can cause severe reservoir damage and consequent reductions to the heat mining rate. The CO2-water-rock geochemical reactions could result in the dissolution of certain minerals and precipitation of others, but its minimal influence on the heat mining rate can be ignored. However, salt precipitation can affect the geochemical reactions by influencing the CO2 flow and distribution, which can reduce the heat mining rate up to 2/5 of the original. Sensitivity studies show that the reservoir condition can affect the salt precipitation and heat mining rate, so a sedimentary reservoir with high temperature, high porosity and permeability, and low salinity should be selected for CPG application, with an appropriately high injection-production pressure difference. The injection of low salinity water before CO2 injection and the combined injection of CO2 and water vapor can be applied to reduce the salt precipitation and increase the heat mining rate in the CPG system.

Suggested Citation

  • Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Rui, Zhenhua & Ezekiel, Justin & Zhang, Liang & Wang, Hongsheng, 2018. "The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 49-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:227:y:2018:i:c:p:49-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917315593
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Li, Dexiang & Pei, Jingjing & Ren, Shaoran, 2014. "Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-246.
    2. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2014. "On the importance of the thermosiphon effect in CPG (CO2 plume geothermal) power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 409-418.
    3. Cui, Guodong & Zhang, Liang & Ren, Bo & Enechukwu, Chioma & Liu, Yanmin & Ren, Shaoran, 2016. "Geothermal exploitation from depleted high temperature gas reservoirs via recycling supercritical CO2: Heat mining rate and salt precipitation effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-852.
    4. Meng, Qingliang & Jiang, Xi, 2014. "Numerical analyses of the solubility trapping of CO2 storage in geological formations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 581-591.
    5. Wang, J.L. & Zhao, L. & Wang, X.D., 2012. "An experimental study on the recuperative low temperature solar Rankine cycle using R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 34-40.
    6. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    7. Yin, Hebi & Sabau, Adrian S. & Conklin, James C. & McFarlane, Joanna & Qualls, A. Lou, 2013. "Mixtures of SF6–CO2 as working fluids for geothermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 243-253.
    8. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    9. Luo, Feng & Xu, Rui-Na & Jiang, Pei-Xue, 2013. "Numerical investigation of the influence of vertical permeability heterogeneity in stratified formation and of injection/production well perforation placement on CO2 geological storage with enhanced C," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1314-1323.
    10. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    11. Sayigh, Ali, 1999. "Renewable energy -- the way forward," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-4), pages 15-30, September.
    12. Chen, Huijuan & Yogi Goswami, D. & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2- and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2802-2808, August.
    13. Ghasemi, Hadi & Sheu, Elysia & Tizzanini, Alessio & Paci, Marco & Mitsos, Alexander, 2014. "Hybrid solar–geothermal power generation: Optimal retrofitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 158-170.
    14. Eccles, Jordan K. & Pratson, Lincoln, 2014. "A “carbonshed” assessment of small- vs. large-scale CCS deployment in the continental US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 352-361.
    15. Quattrocchi, Fedora & Boschi, Enzo & Spena, Angelo & Buttinelli, Mauro & Cantucci, Barbara & Procesi, Monia, 2013. "Synergic and conflicting issues in planning underground use to produce energy in densely populated countries, as Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 393-412.
    16. Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Buttinelli, M. & Armezzani, G. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2013. "Strategic use of the underground in an energy mix plan: Synergies among CO2, CH4 geological storage and geothermal energy. Latium Region case study (Central Italy)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 104-131.
    17. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    18. Sauret, Emilie & Gu, Yuantong, 2014. "Three-dimensional off-design numerical analysis of an organic Rankine cycle radial-inflow turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 202-211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asongu, Simplice A & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2019. "Governance,CO2 emissions and inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 25253, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    2. Asongu, Simplice A & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2019. "Enhancing governance for environmental sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 26282, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    3. Xue, Zhenqian & Ma, Haoming & Wei, Yizheng & Wu, Wei & Sun, Zhe & Chai, Maojie & Zhang, Chi & Chen, Zhangxin, 2024. "Integrated technological and economic feasibility comparisons of enhanced geothermal systems associated with carbon storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    4. Shu, Biao & Zhu, Runjun & Zhang, Shaohe & Dick, Jeffrey, 2019. "A qualitative prediction method of new crack-initiation direction during hydraulic fracturing of pre-cracks based on hyperbolic failure envelope," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 185-195.
    5. Li, Jiawei & Yuan, Wanju & Zhang, Yin & Cherubini, Claudia & Scheuermann, Alexander & Galindo Torres, Sergio Andres & Li, Ling, 2020. "Numerical investigations of CO2 and N2 miscible flow as the working fluid in enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Wu, Xiaotian & Yu, Likui & Hassan, N.M.S. & Ma, Weiwu & Liu, Gang, 2021. "Evaluation and optimization of heat extraction in enhanced geothermal system via failure area percentage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 204-220.
    7. Jian, Guoqing & Gizzatov, Ayrat & Kawelah, Mohammed & AlYousef, Zuhair & Abdel-Fattah, Amr I., 2021. "Simply built microfluidics for fast screening of CO2 foam surfactants and foam model parameters estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Xiao, Caiyun & Ni, Hongjian & Shi, Xian, 2022. "Unsteady model for wellbore pressure transmission of carbon dioxide fracturing considering limited-flow outlet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    9. Wang, Yang & Li, Tuo & Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei, 2019. "Numerical analysis of heat mining and geological carbon sequestration in supercritical CO2 circulating enhanced geothermal systems inlayed with complex discrete fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 92-108.
    10. Shu, Biao & Zhu, Runjun & Elsworth, Derek & Dick, Jeffrey & Liu, Shun & Tan, Jingqiang & Zhang, Shaohe, 2020. "Effect of temperature and confining pressure on the evolution of hydraulic and heat transfer properties of geothermal fracture in granite," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Esteves, Ana Filipa & Santos, Francisca Maria & Magalhães Pires, José Carlos, 2019. "Carbon dioxide as geothermal working fluid: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Yanqing Wang & Liang Zhang & Shaoran Ren & Bo Ren & Bailian Chen & Jun Lu, 2020. "Identification of potential CO2 leakage pathways and mechanisms in oil reservoirs using fault tree analysis," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 331-346, April.
    13. Xiao Liu & Feng Zhang & Shuailiang Song & Xianfeng Tan & Guanhong Feng, 2024. "The Feasibility of Heat Extraction Using CO 2 in the Carbonate Reservoir in Shandong Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Paweł Gładysz & Anna Sowiżdżał & Maciej Miecznik & Maciej Hacaga & Leszek Pająk, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of a Combined Heat and Power Plant Integrated with Carbon Dioxide Removal Technology: A Case Study for Central Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    15. Youwei He & Shiqing Cheng & Zhenhua Rui & Jiazheng Qin & Liang Fu & Jianguo Shi & Yang Wang & Dingyi Li & Shirish Patil & Haiyang Yu & Jun Lu, 2018. "An Improved Rate-Transient Analysis Model of Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells with Non-Uniform Hydraulic Fracture Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Anna Sowiżdżał & Magdalena Starczewska & Bartosz Papiernik, 2022. "Future Technology Mix—Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS)—An Overview of Selected Projects as an Example for Future Investments in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Guo, Wei & Zhang, Xu & Sun, Youhong & Li, Qiang & Liu, Zhao, 2023. "Migration mechanism of pyrolysis oil during oil shale in situ pyrolysis exploitation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    18. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Norouzi, Amir Mohammad & Pouranian, Fatemeh & Rabbani, Arash & Fowler, Neil & Gluyas, Jon & Niasar, Vahid & Ezekiel, Justin & Babaei, Masoud, 2023. "CO2-plume geothermal: Power net generation from 3D fluvial aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    20. Guo, Tiankui & Tang, Songjun & Sun, Jiang & Gong, Facheng & Liu, Xiaoqiang & Qu, Zhanqing & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "A coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical modeling and evaluation of geothermal extraction in the enhanced geothermal system based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    2. Cui, Guodong & Zhang, Liang & Ren, Bo & Enechukwu, Chioma & Liu, Yanmin & Ren, Shaoran, 2016. "Geothermal exploitation from depleted high temperature gas reservoirs via recycling supercritical CO2: Heat mining rate and salt precipitation effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-852.
    3. Cheng, Wen-Long & Li, Tong-Tong & Nian, Yong-Le & Xie, Kun, 2014. "Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 238-245.
    4. Hofmann, Hannes & Babadagli, Tayfun & Zimmermann, Günter, 2014. "Hot water generation for oil sands processing from enhanced geothermal systems: Process simulation for different hydraulic fracturing scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 524-547.
    5. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Ezekiel, Justin & Ebigbo, Anozie & Adams, Benjamin M. & Saar, Martin O., 2020. "Combining natural gas recovery and CO2-based geothermal energy extraction for electric power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    7. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    8. Song, Weiqiang & Wang, Chunguang & Du, Yukun & Shen, Baotang & Chen, Shaojie & Jiang, Yujing, 2020. "Comparative analysis on the heat transfer efficiency of supercritical CO2 and H2O in the production well of enhanced geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Enechukwu, Chioma & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Rui, 2017. "Geothermal exploitation from hot dry rocks via recycling heat transmission fluid in a horizontal well," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 366-377.
    10. Schifflechner, Christopher & Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1292-1302.
    11. Vivian, Jacopo & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2015. "A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 727-746.
    12. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    13. Norouzi, Amir Mohammad & Pouranian, Fatemeh & Rabbani, Arash & Fowler, Neil & Gluyas, Jon & Niasar, Vahid & Ezekiel, Justin & Babaei, Masoud, 2023. "CO2-plume geothermal: Power net generation from 3D fluvial aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    14. Liu, Qiang & Shen, Aijing & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 410-420.
    15. Löffler, Michael, 2017. "Batch Processes in Heat Engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 788-794.
    16. Zhao, Li & Bao, Junjiang, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 748-756.
    17. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    18. Ghasemi, Hadi & Sheu, Elysia & Tizzanini, Alessio & Paci, Marco & Mitsos, Alexander, 2014. "Hybrid solar–geothermal power generation: Optimal retrofitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 158-170.
    19. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    20. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:227:y:2018:i:c:p:49-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.