IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wsirep/18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Flexibilität und Autonomie in der Arbeitszeit: Gut für die Work-Life Balance? Analysen zum Zusammenhang von Arbeitszeitarrangements und Work-Life Balance in Europa

Author

Listed:
  • Lott, Yvonne

Abstract

Flexibilität und Autonomie in der Arbeitszeit haben das Potenzial, Beschäftigte in ihrer Work-Life Balance zu unterstützten. Aber tun sie das auch tatsächlich? Forschungsergebnisse zeigen: Flexibilität und Autonomie in der Arbeitszeit sind generell mit einer guten Work-Life Balance verbunden. Jedoch gilt dies für Männer in der Regel weniger als für Frauen. Zudem spielen Arbeitsmarkt- und Familienpolitik, Sozialpartnerschaft und die betriebliche Arbeitsorganisation für den Zusammenhang zwischen Arbeitszeitautonomie und Work-Life Balance eine entscheidende Rolle. Gewerkschaften und Mitbestimmung haben damit die Möglichkeit und auch die Aufgabe die Flexibilisierung der Arbeitszeit im Interesse der Beschäftigten zu gestalten. So muss für eine Arbeitsorganisation gesorgt werden, die die Vorteile von Arbeitszeitautonomie zur Geltung bringt. Gewerkschaften und Betriebsräte sollten letztlich eine Betriebskultur fördern, in der Männer ermuntert werden, Arbeitszeitautonomie für ihre Aktivitäten außerhalb der Arbeit tatsächlich auch zu nutzen.

Suggested Citation

  • Lott, Yvonne, 2014. "Flexibilität und Autonomie in der Arbeitszeit: Gut für die Work-Life Balance? Analysen zum Zusammenhang von Arbeitszeitarrangements und Work-Life Balance in Europa," WSI Reports 18, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wsirep:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/225377/1/wsi-report-18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klenner, Christina & Brehmer, Wolfram & Plegge, Mareen & Bohulskyy, Yan, 2013. "Förderung der Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf in Tarifverträgen und Betriebsvereinbarungen in Deutschland: Eine empirische Analyse," WSI Working Papers 184, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Deborah M. Figart & Ellen Mutari, 2000. "Work Time Regimes in Europe: Can Flexibility and Gender Equity Coexist?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 847-871, December.
    3. Lott, Yvonne, 2014. "Working time flexibility and autonomy: Facilitating time adequacy? A European perspective," WSI Working Papers 190, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    4. Duncan Gallie & Ying Zhou & Alan Felstead & Francis Green, 2012. "Teamwork, Skill Development and Employee Welfare," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 23-46, March.
    5. Dominique Anxo & Christine Franz & Angelika Kümmerling, 2013. "Working Time Distribution and Preferences Across the Life Course: A European Perspective," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 2, pages 77-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tangian, Andranik S., 2015. "Is the left-right alignment of parties outdated?," WSI Working Papers 198, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Lott, Yvonne, 2015. "Costs and benefits of flexibility and autonomy in working time: The same for women and men?," WSI Working Papers 196, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    3. Keller, Berndt & Seifert, Hartmut, 2015. "Atypical forms of employment in the public sector: Are there any?," WSI Working Papers 199, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    4. Surhan Cam & Serap Palaz, 2023. "Mutual interests management with a purposive approach: Evidence from the Turkish shipyards for an amorphous impact model between (subjective) well‐being and performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 40-70, January.
    5. Marcel Rolf Pfeifer, 2021. "Human Resources during COVID-19: A Monthly Survey on Mental Health and Working Attitudes of Czech Employees and Managers during the Year 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Frodermann, Corinna & Bächmann, Ann-Christin & Hagen, Marina & Grunow, Daniela & Müller, Dana, 2018. "Betriebliche Angebote zur Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf: Mütter kehren schneller zu familienfreundlichen Arbeitgebern zurück (Organizational arrangements for the reconciliation of family and wor," IAB-Kurzbericht 201818, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    7. Zapf, Ines, 2018. "Verbreitung und betriebliche Bestimmungsfaktoren von Arbeitszeitkonten [Distribution of working-time accounts and its establishment-specific determinants]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(1), pages 51-81.
    8. Esther Martínez‐Garcia & Joan Sorribes & Dolors Celma, 2018. "Sustainable Development through CSR in Human Resource Management Practices: The Effects of the Economic Crisis on Job Quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 441-456, July.
    9. Francis Green & Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Golo Henseke, 2022. "Working Still Harder," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(2), pages 458-487, March.
    10. Ludivine Martin & Uyen T. Nguyen-Thi & Caroline Mothe, 2021. "Human resource practices, perceived employability and turnover intention: does age matter?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(28), pages 3306-3320, June.
    11. Schneider, Roland, 2018. "Innovative working time policy in the service sector: Responses to working time policy challenges by service sector unions," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 091e, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    12. Gerold, Stefanie & Nocker, Matthias, 2018. "More Leisure or Higher Pay? A Mixed-methods Study on Reducing Working Time in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 27-36.
    13. W A Jackson, 2015. "Markets and the Meaning of Flexibility," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 20(2), pages 45-65, September.
    14. HAURET Laetitia & MARTIN Ludivine & OMRANI Nessrine & WILLIAMS Donald R., 2016. "Exposure, participation in human resource management practices and employee attitudes," LISER Working Paper Series 2016-16, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    15. Ulrike Huemer & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger & Hedwig Lutz & Christine Mayrhuber, 2017. "Österreich 2025 – Arbeitszeitverteilung in Österreich. Analyse und Optionen aus Sicht der Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmer," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 90(11), pages 865-876, November.
    16. Schneider, Roland, 2018. "Innovative Arbeitszeitpolitik im Dienstleistungssektor: Antworten der Dienstleistungsgewerkschaften auf arbeitszeitpolitische Herausforderungen," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 091, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    17. Lott, Yvonne & Klenner, Christina, 2016. "Ideal workers and ideal parents: Working-time norms and the acceptance of part-time and parental leave at the workplace in Germany," WSI Working Papers 204, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    18. Francis Green & Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Hande Inanc, 2016. "Job-Related Well-Being Through the Great Recession," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 389-411, February.
    19. Nyirabashitsi Sarah Mateke & Ariyo Gracious Kazaara, 2024. "Skills Development and Economic Welfare among the Youth in Kisoro District Uganda," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 1969-1977, May.
    20. Renate Ortlieb & Julian Winterheller, 2020. "Behind Migrant and Non‐Migrant Worktime Inequality in Europe: Institutional and Cultural Factors Explaining Differences," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 785-815, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wsirep:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wsihbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.