IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hbsfof/091.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovative Arbeitszeitpolitik im Dienstleistungssektor: Antworten der Dienstleistungsgewerkschaften auf arbeitszeitpolitische Herausforderungen

Author

Listed:
  • Schneider, Roland

Abstract

Im Gegensatz zur öffentlichen Wahrnehmung ist der Dienstleistungssektor in den Ländern der EU durch schnelle Veränderungs- und Anpassungsprozesse, ein hohes Arbeitsvolumen, atypische Arbeitszeiten und eine wachsende Entgrenzung von Arbeit und Freizeit gekennzeichnet. Hier setzt die vorliegende Studie an. Sie dokumentiert und analysiert Antworten der Gewerkschaften des Dienstleistungssektors in ausgewählten europäischen Ländern auf neue arbeitszeitpolitische Herausforderungen. Berücksichtigt wurden dabei vor allem jene Länder, in denen Arbeitszeitstandards hauptsächlich durch Tarifverträge reguliert werden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die programmatische Neuausrichtung gewerkschaftlicher Arbeitszeitpolitik im Dienstleistungssektor ein gutes Stück vorangekommen ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Schneider, Roland, 2018. "Innovative Arbeitszeitpolitik im Dienstleistungssektor: Antworten der Dienstleistungsgewerkschaften auf arbeitszeitpolitische Herausforderungen," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 091, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsfof:091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/216016/1/hbs-fofoe-wp-091-2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ces:ifodic:v:14:y:2016:i:2:p:19235742 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anna S. Burger, 2015. "Extreme working hours in Western Europe and North America: A new aspect of polarization," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 92, European Institute, LSE.
    3. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1597 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gerhard Bosch, 2017. "Paradigmenwechsel in der gewerkschaftlichen Arbeitszeitpolitik [Paradigm Shift in Labour Union Working Hours Policy]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(8), pages 530-531, August.
    5. Katrin Oesingmann, 2016. "Extension of Collective Agreements in Europe," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(02), pages 59-64, July.
    6. Elke Holst & Julia Bringmann, 2016. "Arbeitszeitrealitäten und Arbeitszeitwünsche in Deutschland: methodische Unterschiede ihrer Erfassung im SOEP und Mikrozensus," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1597, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Lehndorff, Steffen & Haipeter, Thomas, 2007. "Gewerkschaften und andere Akteure der Arbeitszeitpolitik - Wer bestimmt über die Zeit?," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 60(4), pages 181-187.
    8. Seifert, Hartmut & Kümmerling, Angelika & Riedmann, Arnold, 2013. "Langzeitkonten - überschätzte Erwartungen einer biografieorientierten Zeitpolitik?," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(2), pages 133-143.
    9. Lott, Yvonne, 2017. "Flexible Arbeitszeiten: Eine Gerechtigkeitsfrage?," Forschungsförderung Reports 1, Hans Böckler Foundation.
    10. Lott, Yvonne, 2014. "Working time flexibility and autonomy: Facilitating time adequacy? A European perspective," WSI Working Papers 190, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    11. Allmendinger, Jutta & Haarbrücker, Julia, 2017. "Arbeitszeiten und die Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Familie: Ergebnisse der Beschäftigtenbefragung der IG Metall 2017," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2017-002, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    12. Klenner, Christina (Ed.) & Lott, Yvonne (Ed.), 2016. "Working time options over the life course: New Regulations and Empirical Findings in five European Countries," WSI Studies 07, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    13. Wanger, Susanne, 2017. "What makes employees satisfied with their working time? : The role of working hours, time-sovereignty and working conditions for working time and job satisfaction," IAB-Discussion Paper 201720, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    14. Anna S. Burger, 2015. "Extreme Working Hours in Western Europe and North America: A New Aspect of Polarization," LIS Working papers 649, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    15. Wotschack, Philip, 2018. "Optionszeiten auf Basis von Langzeitkonten - eine kritische Bilanz," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 57, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneider, Roland, 2018. "Innovative working time policy in the service sector: Responses to working time policy challenges by service sector unions," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 091e, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    2. Zapf, Ines, 2018. "Verbreitung und betriebliche Bestimmungsfaktoren von Arbeitszeitkonten [Distribution of working-time accounts and its establishment-specific determinants]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(1), pages 51-81.
    3. Zimmert, Franziska, 2019. "Early child care and maternal employment: empirical evidence from Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203528, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Wotschack, Philip, 2018. "Optionszeiten auf Basis von Langzeitkonten - eine kritische Bilanz," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 57, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    5. Weber, Enzo & Zimmert, Franziska, 2017. "The creation and resolution of working hour discrepancies over the life course," IAB-Discussion Paper 201729, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    6. Theresa Markefke & Rebekka Rehm, 2020. "Macroeconomic Determinants of Involuntary Part-Time Employment in Germany," Working Paper Series in Economics 103, University of Cologne, Department of Economics.
    7. Weixia Lyu & Yanan Zheng & Camila Fonseca & Jerry Zhirong Zhao, 2020. "Public-Private Partnership Transformation and Worker Satisfaction: A Case Study of Sanitation Workers in H-City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Verena Tobsch & Wenzel Matiaske & Elke Holst & Tanja Schmidt & Hartmut Seifert, 2018. "Mehr oder weniger arbeiten? Es kommt darauf an, wie man fragt: Methodische Aspekte der Präferenzmessung gewünschter Arbeitszeiten," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 960, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    9. Tangian, Andranik S., 2015. "Is the left-right alignment of parties outdated?," WSI Working Papers 198, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    10. Seifert, Hartmut & Thoemmes, Jens, 2020. "Arbeitszeitkonten in Deutschland und Frankreich. Eine vergleichende Analyse von Betriebsvereinbarungen [Working time accounts in Germany and France. A comparative analysis of company-based agreemen," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(1), pages 45-68.
    11. Lott, Yvonne, 2015. "Costs and benefits of flexibility and autonomy in working time: The same for women and men?," WSI Working Papers 196, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    12. Ayhan GÖRMÜŞ, 2020. "Toplu Pazarlık Kapsamını Etkileyen Faktörler: Karşılaştırmalı Endüstri İlişkileri Temelinde Türk Endüstri İlişkileri Sisteminin Modernizasyonu," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(78), pages 63-109, June.
    13. Wanger, Susanne, 2017. "What makes employees satisfied with their working time? : The role of working hours, time-sovereignty and working conditions for working time and job satisfaction," IAB-Discussion Paper 201720, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    14. Keller, Berndt & Seifert, Hartmut, 2015. "Atypical forms of employment in the public sector: Are there any?," WSI Working Papers 199, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    15. Kümmerling, Angelika. & Lehndorff, Steffen., 2013. "The use of working time-related crisis response measures during the Great Recession," ILO Working Papers 994841273402676, International Labour Organization.
    16. Kapo Wong & Alan H. S. Chan & S. C. Ngan, 2019. "The Effect of Long Working Hours and Overtime on Occupational Health: A Meta-Analysis of Evidence from 1998 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Baumann, Helge & Kohlrausch, Bettina, 2021. "Homeoffice: Potenziale und Nutzung. Aktuelle Zahlen aus der HBS-Erwerbspersonenbefragung, Welle 1 bis 4," WSI Policy Briefs 52, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    18. Christian Grund & Katja Rebecca Tilkes, 2021. "Working Time Mismatch and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Employees’ Time Autonomy and Gender," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1149, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    19. Lott, Yvonne, 2014. "Flexibilität und Autonomie in der Arbeitszeit: Gut für die Work-Life Balance? Analysen zum Zusammenhang von Arbeitszeitarrangements und Work-Life Balance in Europa," WSI Reports 18, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    20. repec:ilo:ilowps:484127 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Franziska Zimmert, 2023. "Early child care and the employment potential of mothers: evidence from semi-parametric difference-in-differences estimation," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 57(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsfof:091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.