IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/08-532.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept and Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • B. VANDECASTEELE
  • M. GEUENS

Abstract

Existing consumer innovativeness scales ignore the multitude of motivation sources of buying innovations. The objective of this paper is to incorporate recent motivation research into a multi-dimensional innovativeness scale to better account for the consumer-product relation. An exploratory and confirmatory study (with 780 respondents in total) indicates that four types of motivations underlie consumer innovativeness: functional, hedonic, social and cognitive. The proposed 28-item Motivated Consumer Innovativeness scale proves to be reliable, valid and goes beyond existing innovativeness scales.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Vandecasteele & M. Geuens, 2008. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept and Measurement," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/532, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:08/532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_08_532.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robertson, Thomas S & Wind, Yoram, 1980. "Organizational Psychographics and Innovativeness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(1), pages 24-31, June.
    2. Grewal, Rajdeep & Mehta, Raj & Kardes, Frank R., 2000. "The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 233-252, June.
    3. Hardesty, David M. & Bearden, William O., 2004. "The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 98-107, February.
    4. Venkatraman, Meera P. & Price, Linda L., 1990. "Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness : Concepts, measurement, and implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 293-315, June.
    5. Mittelstaedt, Robert A, et al, 1976. "Optimal Stimulation Level and the Adoption Decision Process," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 3(2), pages 84-94, Se.
    6. Tian, Kelly Tepper & Bearden, William O & Hunter, Gary L, 2001. "Consumer's Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 50-66, June.
    7. Fisher, Robert J & Price, Linda L, 1992. "An Investigation into the Social Context of Early Adoption Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 477-486, December.
    8. Roehrich, Gilles, 2004. "Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 671-677, June.
    9. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    10. Hirschman, Elizabeth C., 1984. "Experience seeking: A subjectivist perspective of consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 115-136, March.
    11. Gatignon, Hubert & Robertson, Thomas S, 1985. "A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(4), pages 849-867, March.
    12. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    13. Simonson, Itamar & Nowlis, Stephen M., 2000. "The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons," Research Papers 1610, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    14. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2009. "Revising the myth of gay consumer innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 134-144, January.
    15. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Gielens, Katrijn, 2003. "Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 368-384, December.
    16. B. Vandecasteele & M. Geuens, 2009. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Validation and Moderation," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/550, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    18. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1978. "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(4), pages 229-242, March.
    19. Simonson, Itamar & Nowlis, Stephen M, 2000. "The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 49-68, June.
    20. Park, C Whan & Lessig, V Parker, 1977. "Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(2), pages 102-110, Se.
    21. Pierre Le Louarn, 1997. "La tendance à innover des consommateurs: analyse conceptuelle et proposition d'une échelle de mesure," Post-Print hal-02016830, HAL.
    22. Eric J. Arnould & Craig J. Thompson, 2005. "Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 868-882, March.
    23. Fisher, Robert J, 1993. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 303-315, September.
    24. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Gilles Laurent, 1985. "Measuring consumer involvement profiles," Post-Print hal-00786781, HAL.
    25. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1993. "A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(4), pages 611-625, March.
    26. Ostlund, Lyman E, 1974. "Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(2), pages 23-29, Se.
    27. Dickerson, Mary Dee & Gentry, James W, 1983. "Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 225-235, September.
    28. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Baumgartner, Hans, 1992. "The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 434-448, December.
    29. Wong, Nancy & Rindfleisch, Aric & Burroughs, James E, 2003. "Do Reverse-Worded Items Confound Measures in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research? The Case of the Material Values Scale," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(1), pages 72-91, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eigenraam, Anniek W. & Eelen, Jiska & van Lin, Arjen & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2018. "A Consumer-based Taxonomy of Digital Customer Engagement Practices," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 102-121.
    2. Victoria Zhurylo & Olga Prygara, 2018. "Consumer Behaviour Formation In The Customized Service Markets: A Case Of Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    3. Kiran Karande & Altaf Merchant & K. Sivakumar, 2011. "Erratum to: Relationships among time orientation, consumer innovativeness, and innovative behavior: the moderating role of product characteristics," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(2), pages 99-116, June.
    4. Lokesh Jasrai, 2014. "Measuring Mobile Telecom Service Innovativeness Among Youth," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 103-116, June.
    5. Jing Lu & Cheng Lv & Zhongzhen Yang & Mark Hansen, 2019. "Market Segmentation of New Gateway Airports Incorporating Passengers’ Curiosity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Rujipun Assarut & Somkiat Eiamkanchanalai, 2015. "Consumption Values, Personal Characteristics and Behavioral Intentions in Mobile Shopping Adoption," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 27(1), pages 21-41.
    7. Anastasova-Chopeva, Minka & Nikolov, Dimitre & Yovchevska, Plamena, 2015. "Farmers’ Adaptation: What Factors Affecting Agricultural Innovations?," 147th Seminar, October 7-8, 2015, Sofia, Bulgaria 212249, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Anand Thakur & Lokesh Jasrai, 2018. "A Logit Model to Predict Innovativeness among Mobile Telecom Service Users," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 54-71, June.
    9. Dongnyok Shim & Jin Gyo Kim & Jorn Altmann, 2016. "Identifying Key Drivers and Bottlenecks in the Adoption of E-Book Readers in Korea," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2016129, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Jan 2016.
    10. Joerg Koenigstorfer & Andrea Groeppel-Klein, 2012. "Consumer acceptance of the mobile Internet," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 917-928, December.
    11. B. Vandecasteele & M. Geuens, 2009. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Validation and Moderation," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/550, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    12. Dongnyok Shim & Jungwoo Shin & So‐Yoon Kwak, 2018. "Modelling the consumer decision‐making process to identify key drivers and bottlenecks in the adoption of environmentally friendly products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1409-1421, December.
    13. Arun Kumar Kaushik & Zillur Rahman, 2016. "Self-service innovativeness scale: introduction, development, and validation of scale," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 799-822, December.
    14. Victoria Zhurylo & Olga Prygara, 2017. "Influence Of Marketing Communicative Strategies On Consumer Behaviour: A Case Of The High-Technology Market Of Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 3(3).
    15. Catherine Viot & Caroline Bayart & Agnes Lancini, 2017. "The Consumer Intention to Adopt Smart Connected-Products: Does the Category Matter?," Post-Print hal-01991186, HAL.
    16. Kiran Karande & Altaf Merchant & K. Sivakumar, 2012. "Relationships among time orientation, consumer innovativeness, and innovative behavior: the moderating role of product characteristics," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 2(2), pages 108-125, December.
    17. Caroline Bayart & Agnes Lancini & Catherine Viot, 2017. "L'intention d'adopter des objets connectés chez les jeunes de la génération Y et Z," Post-Print hal-01991205, HAL.
    18. Hélia Gonçalves Pereira & Maria Fátima Salgueiro & Paulo Rita, 2017. "Online determinants of e-customer satisfaction: application to website purchases in tourism," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(2), pages 375-403, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 308-318.
    2. Tellis, Gerard J. & Chandrasekaran, Deepa, 2010. "Extent and impact of response biases in cross-national survey research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 329-341.
    3. Rashid Saeed & Hashim Zameer & Idrees Awan & Imdad Ullah, 2014. "A Study of Consumer Innovativeness and Motivations behind Adoption of Innovation," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(7), pages 340-349, July.
    4. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2009. "Revising the myth of gay consumer innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 134-144, January.
    5. Bartels, Jos & Reinders, Machiel J., 2011. "Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 601-609, June.
    6. Hoffmann, Stefan & Soyez, Katja, 2010. "A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 778-785, July.
    7. Roehrich, Gilles, 2004. "Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 671-677, June.
    8. Hossein Nasiri Zarandi & Fereshteh Lotfizadeh, 2016. "The Influence of Cognitive Innovativeness on the Behavior and Style of Consumer Adoption: Implications for Electronic-Banking Service Adoption," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 90-103, October.
    9. Lokesh Jasrai, 2014. "Measuring Mobile Telecom Service Innovativeness Among Youth," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 103-116, June.
    10. Prins, Remco & Verhoef, Peter C. & Franses, Philip Hans, 2009. "The impact of adoption timing on new service usage and early disadoption," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 304-313.
    11. Heidenreich, Sven & Kraemer, Tobias, 2015. "Passive innovation resistance: The curse of innovation? Investigating consequences for innovative consumer behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 134-151.
    12. Hoffmann, Arvid O.I. & Broekhuizen, Thijs L.J., 2010. "Understanding investors' decisions to purchase innovative products: Drivers of adoption timing and range," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 342-355.
    13. Vandecasteele, B. & Geuens, M., 2006. "Consumer innovativeness and GLB: a comparative study," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2006-04, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    14. Guillard, Valérie, 2009. "La tendance de certains consommateurs à tout garder," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/5480 edited by Pinson, Christian.
    15. John Hauser & Gerard J. Tellis & Abbie Griffin, 2006. "Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 687-717, 11-12.
    16. Haris Krijestorac & Rajiv Garg & Prabhudev Konana, 2021. "Decisions Under the Illusion of Objectivity: Digital Embeddedness and B2B Purchasing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2232-2251, July.
    17. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    18. Chao, Chih-Wei & Reid, Mike & Mavondo, Felix T., 2012. "Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 211-217.
    19. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    20. Frambach, Ruud T. & Schillewaert, Niels, 2002. "Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-176, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer innovativeness; Motivation; Scale development;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:08/532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.