IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt7gf7j8n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Potential Payoffs From Ivhs: A Framework For Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rockwell International Science Center

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide a logical framework for the identification and evaluation of alternative Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems (IVHS) functions, to sort by importance, and to specifically relate the various IVHS functions with the public sector goals they might serve. Toward this goal, an analytical sensitivity study was performed to estimate the benefits of those functions associated with modifying the speed-density-flow curves through the application of vehicle automation. Some analysis was also carried out to assess intersection throughput when signalization is coordinated with automated vehicles. A new computer tool called DEMOS was used in these analyses. Second, an extensive literature search was carrried out to gather the results of studies of benefits performed

Suggested Citation

  • Rockwell International Science Center, 1992. "Potential Payoffs From Ivhs: A Framework For Analysis," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7gf7j8n2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt7gf7j8n2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7gf7j8n2.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-deek, Haitham, 1988. "Potential Benefits Of In-vehicle Information Systems In A Real Life Freeway Corridor Under Recurring And Incident-induced Congestion," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3ft304p2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Sheikholeslam, Shahab & Desoer, Charles A., 1990. "Longitudinal Control Of A Platoon Of Vehicles. III, Nonlinear Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0dx8t12z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Al-deek, Haitham M. & Kanafani, Adib K., 1989. "Some Theoretical Aspects Of The Benefits Of En-route Vehicle Guidance (ervg)," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0c83x3gr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Smulders, Stef, 1990. "Control of freeway traffic flow by variable speed signs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 111-132, April.
    5. Commeignes, Hervé, 1991. "User Perceived Benefits with Navigation Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2m18w577, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Goldstein, N. B. & Kumar, K. S. P., 1982. "A decentralized control strategy for freeway regulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 279-290, August.
    7. Gipps, P. G., 1986. "A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 403-414, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minh Sang Pham Do & Ketoma Vix Kemanji & Man Dinh Vinh Nguyen & Tuan Anh Vu & Gerrit Meixner, 2023. "The Action Point Angle of Sight: A Traffic Generation Method for Driving Simulation, as a Small Step to Safe, Sustainable and Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Skabardonis, Alexander, 1991. "Control Strategies And Route Guidance In Signal Controlled Networks," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8q85332b, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Eskafi, Farokh H., 1996. "Modeling And Simulation Of The Automated Highway System," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt11m6t11p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Varaiya, Pravin, 1994. "Models, Simulation, And Performance Of Fully Automated Highways," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1p10g5r4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Taniguchi, Yohei & Nishi, Ryosuke & Ezaki, Takahiro & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2015. "Jam-absorption driving with a car-following model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 304-315.
    6. Oh, Pahngroc & Packard, Andy & Tongue, Benson H., 1999. "A Parmetric Study of Platoon Dynamics and Robust H[infinity] Controller Design," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt99b9w5v1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Li, Linheng & Gan, Jing & Zhou, Kun & Qu, Xu & Ran, Bin, 2020. "A novel lane-changing model of connected and automated vehicles: Using the safety potential field theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    8. Rodrigo C. Carlson & Ioannis Papamichail & Markos Papageorgiou & Albert Messmer, 2010. "Optimal Motorway Traffic Flow Control Involving Variable Speed Limits and Ramp Metering," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 238-253, May.
    9. Bonsall, Peter & Liu, Ronghui & Young, William, 2005. "Modelling safety-related driving behaviour--impact of parameter values," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 425-444, June.
    10. Jin, Wen-Long, 2013. "A multi-commodity Lighthill–Whitham–Richards model of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 361-377.
    11. Khelfa, Basma & Ba, Ibrahima & Tordeux, Antoine, 2023. "Predicting highway lane-changing maneuvers: A benchmark analysis of machine and ensemble learning algorithms," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 612(C).
    12. Xiang Wang & Po Zhao & Yanyun Tao, 2018. "Evaluating Impacts of Overloaded Heavy Vehicles on Freeway Traffic Condition by a Novel Multi-Class Traffic Flow Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Hiroshi Tatsumi & Masaya Kawano & Tetsunobu Yoshitake & Satoshi Toi & Yoshitaka Kajita, 2004. "Evaluation of City Planning Road Development Measures by Microscopic Traffic Simulation," ERSA conference papers ersa04p221, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Mingmin Guo & Zheng Wu & Huibing Zhu, 2018. "Empirical study of lane-changing behavior on three Chinese freeways," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Wang, Bingtong & Li, Zhibin & Wang, Shunchao & Li, Meng & Ji, Ang, 2022. "Modeling bounded rationality in discretionary lane change with the quantal response equilibrium of game theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 145-161.
    16. Tai, Meihua & Tomizuka, Masayoshi, 2003. "Robust Lateral Control of Heavy Duty Vehicles: Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8j2692w0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Storm, Pieter Jacob & Mandjes, Michel & van Arem, Bart, 2022. "Efficient evaluation of stochastic traffic flow models using Gaussian process approximation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 126-144.
    18. Ma, Changxi & Li, Dong, 2023. "A review of vehicle lane change research," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).
    19. Lygeros, John & Godbole, Datta N., 1994. "An Interface Between Continuous And Discrete-event Controllers For Vehicle Automation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt66h9q6qw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    20. Vladislav Krivda & Jan Petru & David Macha & Jakub Novak, 2021. "Use of Microsimulation Traffic Models as Means for Ensuring Public Transport Sustainability and Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-38, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt7gf7j8n2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.